Header Logo

Connection

HASHEM EL-SERAG to Antiviral Agents

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HASHEM EL-SERAG has written about Antiviral Agents.
HASHEM EL-SERAG
Connection Strength
5.105
Antiviral Agents
  1. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in U.S. Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis Treated With Direct-Acting Antivirals Versus Interferon. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 04; 61(7):1226-1237.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.589
  2. Magnitude of and prediction for risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B taking entecavir or tenofovir therapy: A systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct; 35(10):1684-1693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  3. Long-Term Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Patients Treated With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents. Hepatology. 2020 01; 71(1):44-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  4. The effects of sustained virological response to direct-acting anti-viral therapy on the risk of extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 06; 49(11):1442-1447.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  5. Temporal trend and risk determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients on entecavir or tenofovir. J Viral Hepat. 2018 05; 25(5):543-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.366
  6. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in HCV Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Gastroenterology. 2017 10; 153(4):996-1005.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  7. Hepatitis C virus treatment: the unyielding chasm between efficacy and effectiveness. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1381-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.276
  8. Importance of patient, provider, and facility predictors of hepatitis C virus treatment in veterans: a national study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar; 106(3):483-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  9. Utility of a depression score to predict candidacy for hepatitis C virus therapy in veterans: a prospective longitudinal study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Feb 01; 21(3):235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  10. Psychosocial factors are the most common contraindications for antiviral therapy at initial evaluation in veterans with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Jul; 38(6):530-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  11. The Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Entecavir Versus Tenofovir Treated US Cohort With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 04; 21(4):1111-1113.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  12. Interferon: benefit beyond hepatitis therapy? Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Dec; 96(12):3435-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  13. Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and chronic kidney disease in the United States veterans population. Antiviral Res. 2020 02; 174:104698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  14. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer Recurrence in Hepatitis C Virus+ Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 11; 64(11):3328-3336.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  15. Real-world effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir In HCV-infected patients in the US veterans affairs healthcare system. J Viral Hepat. 2018 11; 25(11):1270-1279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  16. A research agenda for curing chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2018 03; 67(3):1127-1131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  17. Research priorities for the discovery of a cure for chronic hepatitis B: Report of a workshop. Antiviral Res. 2018 02; 150:93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  18. Barriers to hepatitis C treatment in the era of direct-acting anti-viral agents. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 11; 46(10):992-1000.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  19. ?Ongoing alcohol consumptions counteracts the benefits of sustained virological response in patients with well compensated hepatitis C cirrhosis: an observational study. Ann Hepatol. 2017 Jan-Feb 2017; 16(1):16-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  20. Race and Gender Differences in the Use of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 08 01; 63(3):291-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  21. Racial differences in the progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-infected veterans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep; 109(9):1427-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  22. Many patients with interleukin 28B genotypes associated with response to therapy are ineligible for treatment because of comorbidities. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb; 12(2):327-333.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  23. Association between facility characteristics and the process of care delivered to patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Feb; 59(2):273-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  24. Hepatocellular carcinoma screening practices in the Department of Veterans Affairs: findings from a national facility survey. Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Nov; 58(11):3117-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  25. CDC and USPSTF 2012 recommendations for screening for hepatitis C virus infection: overview and take-home messages. Gastroenterology. 2013 Mar; 144(3):478-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  26. Process of care for hepatitis C infection is linked to treatment outcome and virologic response. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov; 10(11):1270-1277.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  27. Gaps in the achievement of effectiveness of HCV treatment in national VA practice. J Hepatol. 2012 Feb; 56(2):320-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  28. Insurance status and treatment candidacy of hepatitis C patients: analysis of population-based data from the United States. Hepatology. 2011 Mar; 53(3):737-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  29. Views of hepatitis C virus patients delayed from treatment for psychiatric reasons. J Viral Hepat. 2007 Dec; 14(12):883-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  30. Physical and psychosocial contributors to quality of life in veterans with hepatitis C not on antiviral therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep; 39(8):731-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  31. Survival in hepatitis C and HIV co-infection: a cohort study of hospitalized veterans. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Feb; 3(2):175-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  32. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology. 2002 Nov; 36(5 Suppl 1):S74-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  33. Longitudinal Associations of Risk Factors and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cured Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 11 01; 117(11):1834-1844.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  34. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in people with opioid use disorder: a real-world study of elbasvir/grazoprevir in a US Department of Veterans Affairs population. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022 07 04; 48(4):445-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  35. AGA Institute Rapid Review of the Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations of COVID-19, Meta-Analysis of International Data, and Recommendations for the Consultative Management of Patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul; 159(1):320-334.e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  36. Development of a scoring system to predict hepatocellular carcinoma in Asians on antivirals for chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2018 08; 69(2):278-285.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  37. Global epidemiology and burden of HCV infection and HCV-related disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 02; 14(2):122-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  38. The performance of process measures in hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct; 107(10):1512-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  39. Overview of the viral hepatitis problem. J Fam Pract. 2010 Apr; 59(4 Suppl):S11-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. Aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology. 2010 Feb; 138(2):513-21, 521.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.