MARY MAJUMDER to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications MARY MAJUMDER has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.621
-
A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar; 59(2):337-348.
Score: 0.024
-
The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities. Elife. 2024 Nov 27; 13.
Score: 0.024
-
The Role of Ethics Committees in Charity Care Allocation. J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Sep; 22(3):633-638.
Score: 0.024
-
Large-scale genotype prediction from RNA sequence data necessitates a new ethical and policy framework. Nat Genet. 2024 Aug; 56(8):1537-1540.
Score: 0.024
-
An Ethical Framework for Disclosing the Training Status and Roles of Resident-Level Surgeons to Patients. J Surg Educ. 2024 10; 81(10):1446-1451.
Score: 0.024
-
Translational Research and Health Equity: Gene Therapies for Sickle Cell Disease as a Case Study. Ethics Hum Res. 2024 May-Jun; 46(3):34-39.
Score: 0.023
-
Building Effective Mentoring Relationships During Clinical Ethics Fellowships: Pedagogy, Programs, and People. HEC Forum. 2024 Mar; 36(1):1-29.
Score: 0.020
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk. Annu Rev Med. 2021 01 27; 72:151-166.
Score: 0.018
-
Disability and Contingency Care. Am J Bioeth. 2020 07; 20(7):190-192.
Score: 0.018
-
Hashtag who's missing? Lessons for genomic databases. Disabil Health J. 2021 01; 14(1):100945.
Score: 0.018
-
Data Sharing in the Context of Health-Related Citizen Science. J Law Med Ethics. 2020 03; 48(1_suppl):167-177.
Score: 0.017
-
Laws About Transparent School Vaccination Reporting: Public Health Context and Ethics. Am J Public Health. 2019 12; 109(12):1687-1690.
Score: 0.017
-
Genomic Data-Sharing Practices. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):31-40.
Score: 0.016
-
Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):21-30.
Score: 0.016
-
The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):51-61.
Score: 0.016
-
Off-Target Effects of a Defense of Denial. Am J Bioeth. 2018 09; 18(9):22-24.
Score: 0.016
-
United States: law and policy concerning transfer of genomic data to third countries. Hum Genet. 2018 Aug; 137(8):647-655.
Score: 0.016
-
Serum Homocysteine and its Association with Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Mymensingh Med J. 2017 Oct; 26(4):921-926.
Score: 0.015
-
Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act. Genet Med. 2017 12; 19(12):1289-1294.
Score: 0.014
-
Myriad take two: Can genomic databases remain secret? Science. 2017 05 12; 356(6338):586-587.
Score: 0.014
-
Beyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing. PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov; 14(11):e2000206.
Score: 0.014
-
Federal Privacy Protections: Ethical Foundations, Sources of Confusion in Clinical Medicine, and Controversies in Biomedical Research. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 01; 18(3):288-98.
Score: 0.013
-
Legal Barriers to Adolescent Participation in Research About HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections. Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan; 106(1):40-4.
Score: 0.013
-
Case study. Bad words. Commentary. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Mar-Apr; 44(2):14.
Score: 0.012
-
The "Permanent" Patient Problem. J Law Med Ethics. 2014; 42(1):88-92.
Score: 0.011
-
Ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of ventricular assist devices in supporting patients with end-stage organ dysfunction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013 Jan-Mar; 9(1):11-4.
Score: 0.011
-
More mud, less crystal? Ambivalence, disability, and PGD. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(4):26-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Science. 2009 Jun 26; 324(5935):1648-9.
Score: 0.008
-
Future directions for oversight of stem cell research in the United States: an update. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009 Jun; 19(2):195-200.
Score: 0.008
-
Future directions for oversight of stem cell research in the United States. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009 Mar; 19(1):79-100.
Score: 0.008
-
Cyberbanks and other virtual research repositories. J Law Med Ethics. 2005; 33(1):31-9.
Score: 0.006
-
The roles of ethicists in managed care litigation. J Law Med Ethics. 2005; 33(2):264-73.
Score: 0.006
-
The politics of embryo transfer. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2005; 12(3):10-1.
Score: 0.006
-
Uncharitable care? Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jul-Aug; 34(4):7.
Score: 0.006
-
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
Score: 0.006
-
Data stewardship in FTLD research: Investigator and research participant views. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 04; 20(4):2886-2893.
Score: 0.006
-
Families' experiences accessing care after genomic sequencing in the pediatric cancer context: "It's just been a big juggle". J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec; 33(6):1337-1350.
Score: 0.006
-
Supplementing the fairness framework: system-level and implementation concerns. Am J Bioeth. 2004; 4(3):112-4; discussion W40-2.
Score: 0.006
-
Benefits of sharing neurophysiology data from the BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Humans Consortium. Neuron. 2023 12 06; 111(23):3710-3715.
Score: 0.006
-
Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
Score: 0.005
-
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism among CKD Patients and Correlation with Different Laboratory Parameters. Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Oct; 31(4):1084-1092.
Score: 0.005
-
Development of an Open Database of Genes Included in Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing Panels Available From Major Sources in the US. JAMA Oncol. 2022 04 01; 8(4):1-3.
Score: 0.005
-
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 03 03; 109(3):486-497.
Score: 0.005
-
Airmen and health-care providers' attitudes toward the use of genomic sequencing in the US Air Force: findings from the MilSeq Project. Genet Med. 2020 12; 22(12):2003-2010.
Score: 0.005
-
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs? BMC Med Ethics. 2019 11 21; 20(1):84.
Score: 0.004
-
Learning Health System - Moving from Ethical Frameworks to Practical Implementation. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 09; 47(3):454-458.
Score: 0.004
-
Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):7-11.
Score: 0.004
-
What is a Medical Information Commons? J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):41-50.
Score: 0.004
-
Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):12-20.
Score: 0.004
-
Hopeful and Concerned: Public Input on Building a Trustworthy Medical Information Commons. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):70-87.
Score: 0.004
-
Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 04; 102(4):680-686.
Score: 0.004
-
Creating a data resource: what will it take to build a medical information commons? Genome Med. 2017 09 22; 9(1):84.
Score: 0.004
-
Do privacy and security regulations need a status update? Perspectives from an intergenerational survey. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184525.
Score: 0.004
-
The ethics of conducting molecular autopsies in cases of sudden death in the young. Genome Res. 2016 09; 26(9):1165-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Ethical and Legal Challenges Associated with Public Molecular Autopsies. J Law Med Ethics. 2016 06; 44(2):309-18.
Score: 0.003
-
Persistent confusion and controversy surrounding gene patents. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):145-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Cultivating Administrative Support for a Clinical Ethics Consultation Service. J Clin Ethics. 2016; 27(4):341-351.
Score: 0.003
-
"Systematizing" ethics consultation services. HEC Forum. 2015 Mar; 27(1):35-45.
Score: 0.003
-
Same goal, different path. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(1):23-4.
Score: 0.003
-
Patient-to-patient encounters: benefits and challenges. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jun; 32(6):658-9.
Score: 0.003
-
The ethics of lawyer-ethicists. J Law Med Ethics. 2005; 33(3):603-7.
Score: 0.002