MICHAEL JOHNSON to Comparative Effectiveness Research
This is a "connection" page, showing publications MICHAEL JOHNSON has written about Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Connection Strength
1.380
-
Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Feb; 11(1):51-7.
Score: 0.345
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec; 12(8):1062-73.
Score: 0.314
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec; 12(8):1044-52.
Score: 0.314
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec; 12(8):1053-61.
Score: 0.313
-
Comparative effectiveness of different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of hospitalization in patients with heart failure. J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Mar; 1(2):195-206.
Score: 0.093