Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by SAU WAI CHEUNG and WEIMIN BI.
Connection Strength

3.687
  1. Recurring germline mosaicism in a family due to reversion of an inherited derivative chromosome 8 from an 8;21 translocation with interstitial telomeric sequences. J Med Genet. 2023 06; 60(6):547-556.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.860
  2. Novel applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 06; 18(6):531-542.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.638
  3. Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today's genomic array era? Genet Med. 2013 Jun; 15(6):450-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.437
  4. Co-occurrence of recurrent duplications of the DiGeorge syndrome region on both chromosome 22 homologues due to inherited and de novo events. J Med Genet. 2012 Nov; 49(11):681-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  5. CNVs cause autosomal recessive genetic diseases with or without involvement of SNV/indels. Genet Med. 2020 10; 22(10):1633-1641.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  6. 4p16.3 microdeletions and microduplications detected by chromosomal microarray analysis: New insights into mechanisms and critical regions. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 10; 170(10):2540-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  7. Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug; 22(8):969-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  8. Detection of =1Mb microdeletions and microduplications in a single cell using custom oligonucleotide arrays. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Jan; 32(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  9. Increased LIS1 expression affects human and mouse brain development. Nat Genet. 2009 Feb; 41(2):168-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  10. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn. 2008 Oct; 28(10):943-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  11. Parental somatic mosaicism for CNV deletions - A need for more sensitive and precise detection methods in clinical diagnostics settings. Genomics. 2020 09; 112(5):2937-2941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):663-675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 12; 217(6):691.e1-691.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  14. Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants. Genome Med. 2017 09 21; 9(1):83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  15. Erratum to: Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features. Hum Genet. 2017 08; 136(8):1009-1011.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  16. Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features. Hum Genet. 2017 04; 136(4):377-386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  17. Mechanisms for Complex Chromosomal Insertions. PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov; 12(11):e1006446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  18. Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug 07; 95(2):173-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  19. Delineation of candidate genes responsible for structural brain abnormalities in patients with terminal deletions of chromosome 6q27. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan; 23(1):54-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  20. Fusion of large-scale genomic knowledge and frequency data computationally prioritizes variants in epilepsy. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(9):e1003797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  21. Combined array CGH plus SNP genome analyses in a single assay for optimized clinical testing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan; 22(1):79-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  22. Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles. Genome Res. 2013 Sep; 23(9):1383-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  23. NAHR-mediated copy-number variants in a clinical population: mechanistic insights into both genomic disorders and Mendelizing traits. Genome Res. 2013 Sep; 23(9):1395-409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  24. Small rare recurrent deletions and reciprocal duplications in 2q21.1, including brain-specific ARHGEF4 and GPR148. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 01; 21(15):3345-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  25. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  26. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell. 2011 Sep 16; 146(6):889-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  27. Copy number gain at Xp22.31 includes complex duplication rearrangements and recurrent triplications. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 May 15; 20(10):1975-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by array CGH. Hum Mutat. 2010 Dec; 31(12):1326-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  29. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA. J Mol Diagn. 2009 May; 11(3):226-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  30. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.