Connection

WILLIAM PEACOCK to Myocardial Infarction

This is a "connection" page, showing publications WILLIAM PEACOCK has written about Myocardial Infarction.
Connection Strength

6.933
  1. Methods of the PivotaL triAl of the Atellica VTLi point of care emergencY dePartment high sensitivity troponin evalUationS. Clin Biochem. 2023 Nov; 121-122:110679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.483
  2. The Impact of American College of Cardiology Chest Pain Center Accreditation on Guideline Recommended Acute Myocardial Infarction Management. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2021 12 01; 20(4):173-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  3. Using Sex-specific Cutoffs for High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T to Diagnose Acute Myocardial Infarction. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 04; 28(4):463-466.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  4. Analytical and clinical characterization of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay in a United States population. Clin Biochem. 2020 Sep; 83:28-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  5. Myocardial Infarction Can Be Safely Excluded by High-sensitivity Troponin I Testing 3 Hours After Emergency Department Presentation. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 08; 27(8):671-680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  6. Missed myocardial infarctions in ED patients prospectively categorized as low risk by established risk scores. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5):704-709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  7. Undetectable hs-cTnT in the emergency department and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 12; 64(6):632-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  8. Troponin testing: end of an era? Clin Biochem. 2013 Nov; 46(16-17):1627-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  9. Impact of Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care accreditation on quality: an ACTION Registry?-Get With The Guidelines? analysis. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep; 12(3):116-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  10. Copeptin helps in the early detection of patients with acute myocardial infarction: primary results of the CHOPIN trial (Copeptin Helps in the early detection Of Patients with acute myocardial INfarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 09; 62(2):150-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  11. Central versus local adjudication of myocardial infarction in a cardiac biomarker trial. Am Heart J. 2013 Mar; 165(3):273-279.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  12. Improving emergency department door-to-electrocardiogram time in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009 Sep; 8(3):119-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  13. Cardiologists' and emergency physicians' perspectives on and knowledge of reperfusion guidelines pertaining to ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008; 35(2):152-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  14. Reperfusion strategies in the emergency treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar; 25(3):353-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  15. The Role of Artificial Intelligence for Providing Scientific Content for Laboratory Medicine. J Appl Lab Med. 2024 03 01; 9(2):386-393.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  16. Retrospective review: the incidence of non-ST segment elevation MI in emergency department patients presenting with decompensated heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2003 Nov-Dec; 9(6):303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  17. Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis Confirms the Diagnostic Value of Nourin-Dependent miR-137 and miR-106b in Unstable Angina Patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 30; 24(19).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  18. Performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-Hour, 0/2-Hour, and 0/3-Hour Algorithms for Rapid Triage of Acute Myocardial Infarction : An International Collaborative Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 01; 175(1):101-113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  19. In reply. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 11; 76(5):692-693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  20. Outpatient versus observation/inpatient management of emergency department patients rapidly ruled-out for acute myocardial infarction: Findings from the HIGH-US study. Am Heart J. 2021 01; 231:6-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  21. Biomarkers Enhance Discrimination and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2020 10 20; 142(16):1532-1544.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  22. Performance of Novel High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assays for 0/1-Hour and 0/2- to 3-Hour Evaluations for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the HIGH-US Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 07; 76(1):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  23. Prehospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) do not improve the process of emergency department care in hospitals with higher usage of ECGs in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Clin Cardiol. 2009 Dec; 32(12):668-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  24. Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification With a Single Measurement of High-Sensitivity Troponin I. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 07 23; 74(3):271-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  25. Copeptin to rule out myocardial infarction in Blacks versus Caucasians. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Aug; 8(5):395-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  26. Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22; 6(9).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  27. Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 05 16; 166(10):715-724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  28. Renal Function and Scaled Troponin in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Symptoms of Myocardial Infarction. Am J Nephrol. 2017; 45(4):304-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  29. Necessity of hospitalization and stress testing in low risk chest pain patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb; 35(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  30. Can a Point-of-Care Troponin I Assay be as Good as a Central Laboratory Assay? A MIDAS Investigation. Ann Lab Med. 2016 Sep; 36(5):405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  31. Comparison of the HEART and TIMI Risk Scores for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Mar; 15(1):1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  32. Serial sampling of copeptin levels improves diagnosis and risk stratification in patients presenting with chest pain: results from the CHOPIN trial. Emerg Med J. 2016 Jan; 33(1):23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  33. Sensitive troponin assays in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: Results from the multicenter rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography II trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Apr; 169(4):572-8.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  34. Response to Relationship of race/ethnicity with door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Diseases. Authors' reply. Clin Cardiol. 2014 May; 37(5):323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  35. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics of patients without known cardiovascular disease with a first episode of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2014 Apr; 167(4):480-488.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  36. Relationship of race/ethnicity with door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease. Clin Cardiol. 2013 Dec; 36(12):749-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  37. Temporal trends and predictors in the use of aldosterone antagonists post-acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 08; 61(1):35-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  38. Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 01; 5(5):654-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  39. Predictors of adherence to performance measures in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2013 Jan; 126(1):74.e1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  40. Pre-hospital treatment of STEMI patients. A scientific statement of the Working Group Acute Cardiac Care of the European Society of Cardiology. Acute Card Care. 2011 Jun; 13(2):56-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  41. Incremental benefit of 80-lead electrocardiogram body surface mapping over the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the detection of acute coronary syndromes in patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the Optimal Cardiovascular Diagnostic Evaluation Enabling Faster Treatment of Myocardial Infarction (OCCULT MI) trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Sep; 17(9):932-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  42. Outcomes associated with small changes in normal-range cardiac markers. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Feb; 29(2):162-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  43. Association of hospital primary angioplasty volume in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with quality and outcomes. JAMA. 2009 Nov 25; 302(20):2207-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  44. Acute detection of ST-elevation myocardial infarction missed on standard 12-Lead ECG with a novel 80-lead real-time digital body surface map: primary results from the multicenter OCCULT MI trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Dec; 54(6):779-788.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  45. Initial risk stratification and presenting characteristics of patients with evolving myocardial infarctions. Emerg Med J. 2008 Aug; 25(8):492-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  46. Chest pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for Medicare and Medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15; 102(2):120-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  47. Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin levels to predict in-hospital mortality from ADHERE. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15; 101(2):231-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  48. Prolonged emergency department stays of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients are associated with worse adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management and increased adverse events. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov; 50(5):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  49. The elder patient with suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug; 14(8):732-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  50. Impact of congestive heart failure in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 15; 97(12):1707-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  51. Frequency and consequences of recording an electrocardiogram >10 minutes after arrival in an emergency room in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Initiative). Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 15; 97(4):437-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  52. Association of intravenous morphine use and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. Am Heart J. 2005 Jun; 149(6):1043-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  53. Protocol for Improving Care by FAster risk-STratification through use of high sensitivity point-of-care troponin in patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndrome in the EmeRgency department (ICare-FASTER): a stepped-wedge cluster randomised quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open. 2024 06 13; 14(6):e083752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  54. Insurance status and the treatment of myocardial infarction at academic centers. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Apr; 11(4):343-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  55. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of early eptifibatide for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2003 Dec; 146(6):993-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  56. Normal CK, elevated MB predicts complications in acute coronary syndromes. J Emerg Med. 2001 May; 20(4):385-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  57. Lot-to-Lot Variation for Commercial High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Can We Realistically Report Down to the Assay's Limit of Detection? Clin Chem. 2020 09 01; 66(9):1146-1149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  58. Comparison of troponin T versus creatine kinase-MB in suspected acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 15; 85(4):421-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  59. Improved Assessment of Chest pain Trial (IMPACT): assessing patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 04; 207(5):195-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Causes of Elevated Cardiac Troponins in the Emergency Department and Their Associated Mortality. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 11; 23(11):1267-1273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Effectiveness of EDACS Versus ADAPT Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Practice. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 07; 68(1):93-102.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  62. Effect of a patient's sex on the timing of thrombolytic therapy. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jan; 27(1):8-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  63. A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet. 2011 Mar 26; 377(9771):1077-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  64. Japanese-Western consensus meeting on biomarkers. Int Heart J. 2011; 52(5):253-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  65. The Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS): a multicenter registry of patients with suspicion of acute coronary syndromes reported using the standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department chest pain studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec; 48(6):666-77, 677.e1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  66. Influence of timing of troponin elevation on clinical outcomes and use of evidence-based therapies for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Apr; 45(4):355-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.