ARMIN WEINBERG to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications ARMIN WEINBERG has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.112
-
Developing NaviCanPlan: A Mobile Web Resource Locator for Cancer Providers and Survivors. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec; 30(4):670-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Progress in addressing disparities through comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Dec; 21(12):2015-21.
Score: 0.009
-
Disparate inclusion of older adults in clinical trials: priorities and opportunities for policy and practice change. Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 01; 100 Suppl 1:S105-12.
Score: 0.009
-
A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May; 20(2 Suppl):24-39.
Score: 0.008
-
Policies to address disparities in clinical trials: the EDICT Project. J Cancer Educ. 2009; 24(2 Suppl):S39-49.
Score: 0.008
-
Implementing recommendations to eliminate disparities in clinical trial research. J Cancer Educ. 2009; 24(2 Suppl):S50-1.
Score: 0.008
-
Cancer clinical trials accrual: missed opportunities to address disparities and missed opportunities to improve outcomes for all. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul; 15(7):1818-9.
Score: 0.008
-
Prostate cancer screening in a low-literacy population: does informed decision making occur? Cancer Control. 2005 Nov; 12 Suppl 2:116-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Environmental health: a survey of Texas primary care physicians. Tex Med. 2005 Oct; 101(10):62-70.
Score: 0.007
-
Increasing mammography screening through inpatient education. J Cancer Educ. 2005; 20(4):247-50.
Score: 0.006
-
Attitudes of primary care physicians and specialists about cancer clinical trials: a survey of Texas physicians. Tex Med. 2004 Apr; 100(4):66-72.
Score: 0.006
-
Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec; 26(13):4213-4221.
Score: 0.004
-
Are older adults adequately represented in surgical oncology trials? Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013 May; 98(5):52-3.
Score: 0.003
-
Features associated with successful recruitment of diverse patients onto cancer clinical trials: report from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec; 18(13):3544-50.
Score: 0.002
-
Genetic testing and cancer risk management recommendations by physicians for at-risk relatives. Genet Med. 2011 Feb; 13(2):148-54.
Score: 0.002
-
A survey of environmental safety issues at 20 medical clinics. J Environ Health. 2011 Jan-Feb; 73(6):86-94.
Score: 0.002
-
Human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations and agreement with mandated human papillomavirus vaccination for 11-to-12-year-old girls: a statewide survey of Texas physicians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Aug; 18(8):2325-32.
Score: 0.002
-
Low-literacy interventions to promote discussion of prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug; 33(2):83-90.
Score: 0.002
-
The effect of statins on serum prostate specific antigen levels in a cohort of airline pilots: a preliminary report. J Urol. 2005 Jun; 173(6):1923-5.
Score: 0.002
-
Variation in prostate specific antigen results from 2 different assay platforms: clinical impact on 2304 patients undergoing prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2004 Jun; 171(6 Pt 1):2234-8.
Score: 0.001
-
Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: a comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results. J Cancer Educ. 2003; 18(2):91-4.
Score: 0.001