Header Logo

Connection

FASIHA KANWAL to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications FASIHA KANWAL has written about Treatment Outcome.
FASIHA KANWAL
Connection Strength
0.815
Treatment Outcome
  1. Clinical Care Pathway for the Risk Stratification and Management of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2021 11; 161(5):1657-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  2. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer Recurrence in Hepatitis C Virus+ Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 11; 64(11):3328-3336.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  3. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Interaction Between Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2019 06; 156(8):2149-2157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  4. Barriers to hepatitis C treatment in the era of direct-acting anti-viral agents. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 11; 46(10):992-1000.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  5. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in HCV Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Gastroenterology. 2017 10; 153(4):996-1005.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  6. Hepatitis C Virus Infection Care Pathway-A Report From the American Gastroenterological Association Institute HCV Care Pathway Work Group. Gastroenterology. 2017 05; 152(6):1588-1598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  7. Global epidemiology and burden of HCV infection and HCV-related disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 02; 14(2):122-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  8. Epidemiology and outcomes of hepatitis C infection in elderly US Veterans. J Viral Hepat. 2016 09; 23(9):687-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  9. Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Inducing and Maintaining Alcohol Abstinence in Patients With Chronic Liver?Disease: A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb; 14(2):191-202.e1-4; quiz e20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  10. Pay for Performance in Chronic Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov; 13(12):2042-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  11. Association between facility characteristics and the process of care delivered to patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Feb; 59(2):273-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  12. Patient-reported outcomes of cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep; 11(9):1043-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  13. Process of care for hepatitis C infection is linked to treatment outcome and virologic response. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov; 10(11):1270-1277.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  14. Potentially curative treatment in patients with hepatocellular cancer--results from the liver cancer research network. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug; 36(3):257-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  15. Boceprevir and telaprevir in the management of hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 01; 54(1):96-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  16. An explicit quality indicator set for measurement of quality of care in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug; 8(8):709-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  17. Treatment alternatives for hepatitis B cirrhosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep; 101(9):2076-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. A comparison of liver transplantation outcomes in the pre- vs. post-MELD eras. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jan 15; 21(2):169-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  19. Major stigmata of recent hemorrhage on rectal ulcers in patients with severe hematochezia: Endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Apr; 57(4):462-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  20. The Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Entecavir Versus Tenofovir Treated US Cohort With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 04; 21(4):1111-1113.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  21. Retrospective analysis of long-term outcome 10 years after liver transplantation for Wilson disease: experience over three decades. Transpl Int. 2020 08; 33(8):925-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  22. A learning curve in using orphan liver allografts for transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2020 04; 34(4):e13821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  23. Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2020 09; 65(9):2562-2570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  24. Cost Effectiveness of Transplanting HCV-Infected Livers Into Uninfected Recipients With Preemptive Antiviral Therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 03; 17(4):739-747.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  25. Determinants and Outcomes of Hospice Utilization Among Patients with Advance-Staged Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Veteran Affairs Population. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 05; 63(5):1173-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  26. Hepatitis C virus re-treatment in the era of direct-acting antivirals: projections in the USA. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr; 47(7):1023-1031.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Optimal timing of hepatitis C treatment for patients on the liver transplant waiting list. Hepatology. 2017 03; 65(3):777-788.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  28. Referral and receipt of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in United States veterans: effect of patient and nonpatient factors. Hepatology. 2013 May; 57(5):1858-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Gaps in the achievement of effectiveness of HCV treatment in national VA practice. J Hepatol. 2012 Feb; 56(2):320-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus and HCV seropositive status after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of clinical studies. Am J Transplant. 2005 Oct; 5(10):2433-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.