JACK HOLLADAY to Astigmatism
This is a "connection" page, showing publications JACK HOLLADAY has written about Astigmatism.
Connection Strength
5.877
-
Astigmatism analysis and reporting of surgically induced astigmatism and prediction error. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 07 01; 48(7):799-812.
Score: 0.672
-
Residual astigmatism with toric intraocular lens misalignment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 08; 46(8):1208-1209.
Score: 0.588
-
Calculation of total surgically induced astigmatism with a toric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 05; 46(5):793-794.
Score: 0.578
-
Reply. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 08; 45(8):1210-1211.
Score: 0.549
-
Improving toric intraocular lens calculations using total surgically induced astigmatism for a 2.5?mm temporal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 03; 45(3):272-283.
Score: 0.524
-
Improved Accuracy With a Vergence-Based Online Toric Intraocular Lens Back-calculator. J Refract Surg. 2018 09 01; 34(9):639.
Score: 0.515
-
Interpretation of doubled-angle plots. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct; 39(10):1627-8.
Score: 0.366
-
Exact toric intraocular lens calculations using currently available lens constants. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul; 130(7):946-7; author reply 948-9.
Score: 0.336
-
Standards for analyzing astigmatic outcomes: Part II: Recommended statistical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 51(6):447-455.
Score: 0.206
-
Standards for analyzing astigmatic outcomes: Part I: astigmatism basics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 51(6):440-446.
Score: 0.206
-
Wrap-up R functions for statistical analysis of spherical equivalent and astigmatic prediction errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 08 01; 49(8):890-891.
Score: 0.181
-
Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jan; 27(1):61-79.
Score: 0.151
-
Rethinking the optimal methods for vector analysis of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 01 01; 47(1):100-105.
Score: 0.151
-
Reply to comment on: Rethinking the optimal methods for vector analysis of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 01 01; 47(1):139.
Score: 0.151
-
Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: IV. Rethinking astigmatism analysis for intraocular lens-based surgery: Suggested terminology, analysis, and standards for outcome reports. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 10; 44(10):1169-1174.
Score: 0.129
-
Evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jan; 24(1):57-65.
Score: 0.123
-
Intraocular lens calculations using the Holladay toric calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 11; 42(11):1694-1695.
Score: 0.113
-
Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Sep; 18(5):429-43.
Score: 0.085
-
Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb; 22(1):81-95.
Score: 0.054
-
Pterygia as cause of post-cataract with-the-rule astigmatism. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1985 Mar; 11(2):176-9.
Score: 0.050
-
Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jul; 96(1):90-3.
Score: 0.045
-
Application of Purkinje images for pinhole pupilloplasty and relevance to chord length mu. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 06; 45(6):745-751.
Score: 0.034
-
Photorefractive keratectomy with an ablatable mask and rail system for simultaneous correction of myopia and astigmatism: preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999 Feb; 34(1):9-16.
Score: 0.033
-
Intraocular lens power calculations for multifocal intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct 15; 114(4):405-8.
Score: 0.021
-
Night vision complaints after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004 Aug; 111(8):1620-1; author reply 1621-2.
Score: 0.012
-
Relationship between refractive error and visual acuity in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Jan; 105(1):86-92.
Score: 0.004