Connection

SUSAN HILSENBECK to Predictive Value of Tests

This is a "connection" page, showing publications SUSAN HILSENBECK has written about Predictive Value of Tests.
Connection Strength

0.169
  1. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9(6-7):3-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  2. Biomarkers in benign breast disease: risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 02; 90(17):1247-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  3. Predictors of post-mastectomy reconstruction in an underserved population. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jun; 66(6):763-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  4. The prognostic significance of surgical staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 1992 May; 45(2):142-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  5. Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Sep; 12(7):472-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  6. Gene expression patterns in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded core biopsies predict docetaxel chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Mar; 108(2):233-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  7. Genomic approaches in the management and treatment of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005 Feb 28; 92(4):618-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  8. Role of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 05; 95(5):353-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  9. Prognostic value of p53 for local failure in mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000 May; 18(9):1906-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  10. Correlation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 messenger RNA with protein expression in primary breast cancer tissues: detection of higher levels in tumors with poor prognostic features. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 May 01; 88(9):601-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.