Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JOHN COVERDALE and LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH.
Connection Strength

4.869
  1. Professional Integrity and the Role of Medical Students in Professional Self-Regulation. Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Jun; 40(3):525-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.549
  2. Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 01; 18(3):209-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.546
  3. Responsibly managing students' learning experiences in student-run clinics: a virtues-based ethical framework. Teach Learn Med. 2014; 26(3):312-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  4. An ethical framework for conducting research on pregnant, opioid-dependent women. Addiction. 2013 Feb; 108(2):248-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  5. Professional virtue of civility: responding to commentaries. J Med Ethics. 2023 10; 49(10):692-693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  6. Professional virtue of civility and the responsibilities of medical educators and academic leaders. J Med Ethics. 2023 10; 49(10):674-678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  7. Undue burdens created by the Texas Abortion Law for vulnerable pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 04; 226(4):529-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  8. John Gregory's medical ethics elucidates the concepts of compassion and empathy. Med Teach. 2022 Jan; 44(1):45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  9. Professional integrity in maternal?- fetal innovation and research: an essential component of perinatal medicine. J Perinat Med. 2021 Nov 25; 49(9):1027-1032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  10. Teaching Professional Formation in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Med. 2020 10; 95(10):1488-1491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  11. Trustworthiness and Professionalism in Academic Medicine. Acad Med. 2020 06; 95(6):828-832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  12. Teaching Medical Ethics in Graduate and Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness. Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Aug; 41(4):520-525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  13. Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible? J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):439-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  14. Methods of influencing the decisions of psychiatric patients: an ethical analysis. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Sep-Oct; 21(5):275-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  15. Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan; 210(1):27-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  16. Focus on patient management: responsibly managing psychiatric inpatient refusal of medical or surgical diagnostic work-up. Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Sep; 61(9):868-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  17. The ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with pregnant women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec; 112(6):1361-1368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  18. Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications. J Med Philos. 2007 Jan-Feb; 32(1):65-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  19. Preventive ethics for including women of childbearing potential in clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May; 194(5):1221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  20. Ethically justified clinical strategies for promoting geriatric assent. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Feb; 21(2):151-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  21. A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):901-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  22. Argument-based medical ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct; 191(4):1097-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  23. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30(3):659-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  24. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep; 187(3):696-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Enhancing decision-making by depressed pregnant patients. J Perinat Med. 2002; 30(4):349-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  26. Sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies in chronically ill psychiatric patients. Med J Aust. 1997 Mar 03; 166(5):231-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  27. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb; 48(2):209-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  28. Clinical implications and management strategies when depression occurs during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov; 36(4):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  29. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):169-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  30. Sexually transmitted disease prevention services for female chronically mentally ill patients. Community Ment Health J. 1995 Aug; 31(4):303-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  31. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  32. Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul; 167(1):19-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  33. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern. Acad Med. 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  34. Principles and practice of geriatric assent. Aging Ment Health. 2006 Jan; 10(1):48-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.