Header Logo

Connection

ANDREW CIVITELLO to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications ANDREW CIVITELLO has written about Aged.
ANDREW CIVITELLO
Connection Strength
0.309
Aged
  1. Incidental diagnosis of interrupted aortic arch in a 72-year-old man. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009; 36(5):494-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  2. Use of a percutaneous ventricular assist device for treatment of cardiogenic shock due to critical aortic stenosis. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006; 33(4):487-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  3. Mortality in Recipients of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep; 10(9):2049-2058.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  4. Sex Disparities in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Delayed Presentation and Worse Right Heart Failure. ASAIO J. 2024 06 01; 70(6):469-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  5. Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients with Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. Tex Heart Inst J. 2021 Sep 01; 48(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  6. Empagliflozin Effects on Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the EMBRACE-HF Trial. Circulation. 2021 04 27; 143(17):1673-1686.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  7. Accuracy of Postoperative Risk Scores for Survival Prediction in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile 1 Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients. ASAIO J. 2020 05; 66(5):539-546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  8. Gastrointestinal Bleeding After HeartMate II or HVAD Implantation: Incidence, Location, Etiology, and Effect on Survival. ASAIO J. 2020 03; 66(3):283-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  9. Outcomes of Repeat Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange. ASAIO J. 2020 01; 66(1):64-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. Effect of cardiac arrest with aortic cross-clamping during left ventricular assist device implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 01 01; 30(1):47-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. Fatal Neurologic Dysfunction During Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 04; 107(4):1132-1138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  12. A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of a Patient-Centered Ventricular Assist Device Decision Aid (VADDA Trial). J Card Fail. 2018 Oct; 24(10):661-671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  13. Predictive value of preoperative serum albumin levels on outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. J Card Surg. 2018 Aug; 33(8):469-478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Model of End-Stage Liver Disease-eXcluding International Normalized Ratio (MELD-XI) Scoring System to Predict Outcomes in Patients Who Undergo Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 08; 106(2):513-519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. Bridging to a Long-Term Ventricular Assist Device With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support. Artif Organs. 2018 Jun; 42(6):589-596.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. Effect of obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Artif Organs. 2018 Jun; 21(2):180-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With a Small Left Ventricle. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 03; 105(3):799-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  18. Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of?Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With?Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A 15-Year Institutional Experience. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 02; 4(2):257-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. Left ventricular outflow tract closure during LVAD implantation: 2 cases of patients supported for over 6?years. J Artif Organs. 2017 Dec; 20(4):350-353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  20. Outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan; 48(1):27-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Continuous-flow ventricular assist device exchange is safe and effective in prolonging support time in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan; 149(1):267-75, 278.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  22. Trauma in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 01; 112(9):1520-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  23. Percutaneous ventricular assist device in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with cardiogenic shock: bridge to myectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar; 93(3):978-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  24. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb; 2(2):91-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan; 27(1):106-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. Use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Mar; 18(3):93-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006; 33(2):111-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  28. Hemodynamic support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device during stenting of an unprotected left main coronary artery. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004; 31(1):84-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.