Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DOUGLAS KOCH and JACK HOLLADAY.
DOUGLAS KOCH
Connection Strength
4.195
JACK HOLLADAY
  1. Total keratometric power vs total corneal power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 07 01; 48(7):858.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.847
  2. Residual astigmatism with toric intraocular lens misalignment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 08; 46(8):1208-1209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.742
  3. Impact of spherical aberration on visual quality and depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Jun 01; 50(6):651-652.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  4. Wrap-up R functions for statistical analysis of spherical equivalent and astigmatic prediction errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 08 01; 49(8):890-891.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  5. Statistics of prediction error for non-Gaussian dependent and independent datasets. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 04 01; 49(4):440-442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  6. Contemporary statistical analysis of refractive error in adults, pseudophakia, and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 11 01; 48(11):1346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  7. Astigmatism analysis and reporting of surgically induced astigmatism and prediction error. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 07 01; 48(7):799-812.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  8. Rethinking the optimal methods for vector analysis of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 01 01; 47(1):100-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  9. Reply to comment on: Rethinking the optimal methods for vector analysis of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 01 01; 47(1):139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  10. Review and recommendations for univariate statistical analysis of spherical equivalent prediction error for IOL power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 01; 47(1):65-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  11. Re: Hoffer et?al.: Update on intraocular lens power calculation study protocols: the better way to design and report clinical trials (Ophthalmology. 2020; Jul 9 [Epub ahead of print]). Ophthalmology. 2021 04; 128(4):e20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  12. Reply. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 02; 45(2):255-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  13. Wang-Koch axial length adjustment for the Holladay 2 formula in long eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 10; 44(10):1291-1292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  14. Evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jan; 24(1):57-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  15. Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Sep; 18(5):429-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  16. Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan; 129(1):68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  17. Evaluation of relationships among refractive and topographic parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jun; 25(6):814-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  18. Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: IV. Rethinking astigmatism analysis for intraocular lens-based surgery: Suggested terminology, analysis, and standards for outcome reports. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 10; 44(10):1169-1174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.