Header Logo

Connection

DOUGLAS KOCH to Refraction, Ocular

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DOUGLAS KOCH has written about Refraction, Ocular.
DOUGLAS KOCH
Connection Strength
13.494
Refraction, Ocular
  1. Standards for analyzing astigmatic outcomes: Part I: astigmatism basics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 51(6):440-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.836
  2. Repeatability of a Combined Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Hartman-Shack Aberrometer in Pseudophakic Eyes With and Without Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Refract Surg. 2024 Sep; 40(9):e645-e653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.794
  3. Wrap-up R functions for statistical analysis of spherical equivalent and astigmatic prediction errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 08 01; 49(8):890-891.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  4. Total keratometric power vs total corneal power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 07 01; 48(7):858.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  5. Intraocular Lens Power Calculations in Eyes with Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery: Review and Expert Opinion. Ophthalmology. 2021 11; 128(11):e121-e131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.594
  6. Calculation of Axial Length Using a Single Group Refractive Index versus Using Different Refractive Indices for Each Ocular Segment: Theoretical Study and Refractive Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2019 05; 126(5):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  7. Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis or Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Jul-Aug; 6(4):332-338.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.483
  8. The Enigmatic Cornea and Intraocular Lens Calculations: The LXXIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov; 171:xv-xxx.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  9. Comparison of Newer IOL Power Calculation Methods for Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 07 01; 57(9):OCT162-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.451
  10. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec; 38(12):2080-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  11. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep; 36(9):1466-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  12. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar; 36(3):425-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  13. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  14. Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Oct; 33(10):1713-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  15. Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 105:36-41; discussion 41-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  16. Size of corneal topographic effective optical zone: comparison of standard and customized myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug; 142(2):227-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  17. Impact of Biometric Parameters on the Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Included in the ESCRS IOL Power Calculator. J Refract Surg. 2025 Nov; 41(11):e1240-e1248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  18. Standards for analyzing astigmatic outcomes: Part II: Recommended statistical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 51(6):447-455.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  19. Performance of formulas included in the ESCRS intraocular lens power calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Dec 01; 50(12):1224-1229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  20. Evaluating the small aperture intraocular lens: depth of focus and the role of refraction and preoperative corneal astigmatism in visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Nov 01; 50(11):1165-1172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  21. Reply : Outcomes of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions for residual astigmatism in patients after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 01 01; 50(1):104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  22. Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Nov; 29(11):2039-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  23. Early outcomes of second-generation light-adjustable lenses in eyes with and without corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 11 01; 49(11):1180-1182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  24. Outcomes of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions for residual astigmatism in patients after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 08 01; 49(8):812-817.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  25. Efficacy of segmented axial length and artificial intelligence approaches to intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 07 01; 49(7):697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  26. Comparison of accuracy of a toric calculator with predicted vs measured posterior corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 01 01; 49(1):29-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  27. Methods of estimating corneal refractive power after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jun; 28(6):954-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  28. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr; 109(4):651-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  29. Refractive and keratometric outcomes of supervised novice surgeon-performed limbal relaxing incisions: 1-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Oct 01; 47(10):1319-1326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  30. Rethinking the optimal methods for vector analysis of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 01 01; 47(1):100-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  31. Outcome of toric intraocular lenses implanted in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 04; 46(4):534-539.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  32. Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan; 129(1):68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  33. Evaluation of total keratometry and its accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 10; 45(10):1416-1421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  34. Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jul; 25(7):898-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  35. Axial, instantaneous, and refractive formulas in computerized videokeratography of normal corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Sep; 24(9):1184-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  36. Wang-Koch axial length adjustment for the Holladay 2 formula in long eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 10; 44(10):1291-1292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  37. [Assessment of refractive difference after photorefractive keratectomy. A comparison between keratometry and computer-assisted video keratography]. Ophthalmologe. 1997 Oct; 94(10):699-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  38. Intraocular lens power calculations in?short?eyes using 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 07; 43(7):892-897.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  39. Corneal asphericity and intraocular lens power in eyes with previous laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 11; 42(11):1696-1697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  40. Accuracy of toric intraocular lens axis alignment using a 3-dimensional computer-guided visualization system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 04; 42(4):550-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  41. Treatment of Presbyopia in Emmetropes Using a Shape-Changing Corneal Inlay: One-Year Clinical Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar; 123(3):466-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  42. IOL Calculations in Short, Long, and Postrefractive Eyes. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2016; 56(3):49-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  43. Repeatability and comparability of corneal power and corneal astigmatism obtained from a point-source color light-emitting diode topographer, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a low-coherence reflectometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct; 41(10):2242-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  44. Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Sep; 18(5):429-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  45. Total corneal power estimation: ray tracing method versus gaussian optics formula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 25; 52(3):1716-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  46. Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined Placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer. Cornea. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1136-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  47. Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with prior radial keratotomy: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009 Sep; 116(9):1688-1696.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  48. Wavefront reconstruction methods. J Refract Surg. 2009 01; 25(1):9-10; author reply 10-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  49. New options for IOL calculations after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar; 32(3):371-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  50. Anterior lenticonus detected by wavefront aberrometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov; 140(5):921-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  51. Reply : Efficacy of segmented axial length and artificial intelligence approaches to intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 03 01; 50(3):313-314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  52. Reply : Efficacy of segmented axial length and artificial intelligence approaches to intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 02 01; 50(2):195-196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  53. Performance of IOL calculation formulas that use measured posterior corneal power in eyes following myopic laser vision correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 01 01; 50(1):7-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  54. Surgeons need to know more about intraocular lens design for accurate power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 06 01; 49(6):556-557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  55. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May; 29(5):970-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  56. Contemporary statistical analysis of refractive error in adults, pseudophakia, and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 11 01; 48(11):1346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  57. Outcome of astigmatism correction using femtosecond laser combined with cataract surgery: penetrating vs intrastromal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 09 01; 48(9):1063-1072.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  58. Astigmatism analysis and reporting of surgically induced astigmatism and prediction error. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 07 01; 48(7):799-812.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  59. Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 11 01; 48(11):1297-1304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  60. Accuracy of astigmatism correction with toric intraocular lens implantation in eyes with previous radial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Apr 01; 48(4):417-420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  61. Comparison of a ray-tracing refractometer, autorefractor, and computerized videokeratography in measuring pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb; 28(2):276-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  62. Evaluating the prediction accuracy of the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula using a heteroscedastic statistical method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 48(1):37-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  63. Repeatability and comparability of the Galilei-G4 and Cassini in measuring corneal power and astigmatism in normal and post-refractive surgery eyes. Sci Rep. 2021 08 09; 11(1):16141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  64. Review and recommendations for univariate statistical analysis of spherical equivalent prediction error for IOL power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 01; 47(1):65-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  65. Outcomes of initial PRK and LASIK procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Apr; 26(4):469-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  66. Corneal topography classification in myopic eyes based on axial, instantaneous, refractive, and profile difference maps. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Aug; 25(8):1069-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  67. Preoperative screening of contact lens wearers before refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Aug; 25(8):1080-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  68. Evaluation of relationships among refractive and topographic parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jun; 25(6):814-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  69. Corneal topographic changes induced by excision of perilimbal lesions. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999 Jun; 30(6):458-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  70. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 06; 45(6):725-731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  71. Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Mar; 44(3):362-368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  72. Radial and staggered treatment patterns to correct hyperopia using noncontact holmium:YAG laser thermal keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jan; 24(1):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  73. Hyperopia correction by noncontact holmium:YAG laser thermal keratoplasty: U.S. phase IIA clinical study with 2-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov; 104(11):1938-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  74. Refractive outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 06; 43(6):761-766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  75. Hyperopia correction by noncontact holmium:YAG laser thermal keratoplasty. United States phase IIA clinical study with a 1-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1996 Oct; 103(10):1525-35; discussion 1536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  76. Through-focus performance with a corneal shape-changing inlay: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 07; 42(7):965-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  77. New regression formula for toric intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 05; 42(5):663-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  78. Computerized videokeratography and keratometry in determining intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr; 22(3):362-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  79. Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Mar; 42(3):363-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  80. Repeatability of posterior and total corneal curvature measurements with a dual Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec; 41(12):2731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  81. Comparison of corneal power, astigmatism, and wavefront aberration measurements obtained by a point-source color light-emitting diode-based topographer, a Placido-disk topographer, and a combined Placido and dual Scheimpflug device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug; 41(8):1658-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  82. Prediction of refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 May; 41(5):936-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  83. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  84. Expanding the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal thickness and posterior surface information for the detection of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec; 156(6):1102-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  85. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. Cornea. 2011 Aug; 30(8):945-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  86. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Refract Surg. 2011 Jan; 27(1):7-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  87. Detection of static cyclotorsion and compensation for dynamic cyclotorsion in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Oct; 36(10):1718-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  88. Correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens compared to peripheral corneal relaxing incisions. J Refract Surg. 2011 Mar; 27(3):165-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  89. Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy in myopes. Nidek US Investigators Group. J Refract Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr; 16(2):122-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  90. Comparative corneal topography and refractive variables in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Feb; 127(2):158-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.