Connection

DOUGLAS KOCH to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DOUGLAS KOCH has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

1.674
  1. Repeatability of a Combined Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Hartman-Shack Aberrometer in Pseudophakic Eyes With and Without Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Refract Surg. 2024 Sep; 40(9):e645-e653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  2. Validating and disproving what we "know". J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Sep; 30(9):1815-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  3. A Mouse Model for Corneal Neovascularization by Alkali Burn. J Vis Exp. 2023 06 30; (196).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  4. Evaluation of total keratometry and its accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 10; 45(10):1416-1421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  5. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Reproducibility of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping for a 9-mm Zone Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Cornea. 2019 Jan; 38(1):67-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  6. Calculation of Axial Length Using a Single Group Refractive Index versus Using Different Refractive Indices for Each Ocular Segment: Theoretical Study and Refractive Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2019 05; 126(5):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  7. Evaluation of crystalline lens and intraocular lens tilt using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 01; 45(1):35-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  8. Comparison of Newer IOL Power Calculation Methods for Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 07 01; 57(9):OCT162-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  9. Repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Cornea. 2013 Dec; 32(12):1544-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  10. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov; 37(11):2018-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  11. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep; 36(9):1466-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  12. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar; 36(3):425-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  13. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  14. Thickness Speed Progression Index: Machine Learning Approach for Keratoconus Detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar; 271:188-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  15. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct; 111(10):1825-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  16. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May; 29(5):970-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  17. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr; 109(4):651-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  18. Comparison of a ray-tracing refractometer, autorefractor, and computerized videokeratography in measuring pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb; 28(2):276-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Repeatability and comparability of the Galilei-G4 and Cassini in measuring corneal power and astigmatism in normal and post-refractive surgery eyes. Sci Rep. 2021 08 09; 11(1):16141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jul; 25(7):898-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  21. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 06; 45(6):725-731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  22. Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Mar; 44(3):362-368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  23. Hyperopia correction by noncontact holmium: YAG laser thermal keratoplasty: five-pulse treatments with 1-year follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov; 235(11):702-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  24. Changes in computerized videokeratography induced by artificial tears. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Sep; 23(7):1023-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  25. Computerized videokeratography and keratometry in determining intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr; 22(3):362-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  26. Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Mar; 42(3):363-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  27. Iris autofluorescence in Fuchs' heterochromic uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 10; 100(10):1397-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  28. Repeatability of posterior and total corneal curvature measurements with a dual Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec; 41(12):2731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  29. Repeatability and comparability of corneal power and corneal astigmatism obtained from a point-source color light-emitting diode topographer, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a low-coherence reflectometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct; 41(10):2242-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  30. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  31. Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19 Suppl:178-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  32. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  33. Intraocular lens power calculation after previous myopic laser vision correction based on corneal power measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Apr; 38(4):589-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  34. Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined Placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer. Cornea. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1136-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  35. The Corneal EyeSys System: accuracy analysis and reproducibility of first-generation prototype. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989 Nov-Dec; 5(6):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.