Header Logo

Connection

DOUGLAS KOCH to Refractive Surgical Procedures

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DOUGLAS KOCH has written about Refractive Surgical Procedures.
DOUGLAS KOCH
Connection Strength
4.790
Refractive Surgical Procedures
  1. Early outcomes of second-generation light-adjustable lenses in eyes with and without corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 11 01; 49(11):1180-1182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.825
  2. December consultation #2. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec; 44(12):1528-1529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.587
  3. Another year of progress. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb; 37(2):219-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  4. New options for IOL calculations after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar; 32(3):371-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  5. Repeatability of a Combined Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Hartman-Shack Aberrometer in Pseudophakic Eyes With and Without Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Refract Surg. 2024 Sep; 40(9):e645-e653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  6. Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Nov; 29(11):2039-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  7. Ocular higher-order aberrations in individuals screened for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct; 29(10):1896-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  8. The cornea or the lens? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Mar; 28(3):379-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  9. Repeatability and comparability of the Galilei-G4 and Cassini in measuring corneal power and astigmatism in normal and post-refractive surgery eyes. Sci Rep. 2021 08 09; 11(1):16141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  10. Measuring patient outcomes after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 May; 27(5):645-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  11. Outcomes of initial PRK and LASIK procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Apr; 26(4):469-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  12. Incorporating new refractive surgical procedures into clinical practice. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Aug; 25(8):1029-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  13. The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery: 2018 in Review. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 12; 44(12):1411-1412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  14. Format for reporting refractive surgical data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Mar; 24(3):285-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  15. Refractive surgery--the cutting edge. Nat Med. 1996 Jul; 2(7):740-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  16. An aphoristic guide to building a refractive surgical practice. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Jun; 22(5):513-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  17. JCRS 2015: Gratitude and progress. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec; 41(12):2597.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  18. Practicing refractive surgery with Food and Drug Administration restraints. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995 Nov; 21(6):595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  19. Reeling in the years. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan; 41(1):1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  20. Updating Keratospeak IV. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Sep; 111(9):1166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  21. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. Cornea. 2011 Aug; 30(8):945-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  22. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  23. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Refract Surg. 2011 Jan; 27(1):7-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  24. The thick and thin of LASIK flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 May; 30(5):937-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  25. Pseudoaccommodation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011; 51(2):109-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.