Header Logo

Connection

SAMIR AWAD to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications SAMIR AWAD has written about Treatment Outcome.
SAMIR AWAD
Connection Strength
0.311
Treatment Outcome
  1. Active Mental Illnesses Adversely Affect Surgical Outcomes. Am Surg. 2016 Dec 01; 82(12):1238-1243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  2. A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 01; 59(1):51-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  3. Patient Satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Surg. 2013 Mar; 37(3):530-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  4. Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2013 Feb; 205(2):182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  5. Laparoscopic transcutaneous closure of central defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Apr; 22(2):e66-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  6. Outcomes of damage-control celiotomy in elderly nontrauma patients with intra-abdominal catastrophes. Am J Surg. 2010 Dec; 200(6):783-8; discussion 788-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  7. Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and heart rate control during noncardiac surgery. Am J Surg. 2007 Aug; 194(2):189-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  8. Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermis. Am J Surg. 2007 Aug; 194(2):192-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  9. Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun; 193(6):697-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  10. Transperitoneal view of the PROLENE hernia system open mesh repair. Int Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug; 90(3 Suppl):S63-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Use of a predictive equation for diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):463-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  12. Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):580-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  13. Hospital Minimally Invasive Surgery Utilization for Gastrointestinal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):303-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  14. A Multi-Component Strategy to Decrease Wound Complications after Open Infra-Inguinal Re-Vascularization. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan; 19(1):87-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  15. What Factors are Associated With 90-day Episode-of-care Payments for Younger Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov; 475(11):2808-2818.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  16. Trans-cutaneous Closure of Central Defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg. 2013 Jan; 37(1):42-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Local variations in the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a multicenter study. Am J Surg. 2011 Aug; 202(2):139-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Early predictors of anastomotic leaks after colectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Mar; 13(1):41-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center. Am J Surg. 2008 Nov; 196(5):647-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  20. Outcomes of Veterans Affairs patients older than age 80 after surgical procedures for colon malignancies. Am J Surg. 2007 Nov; 194(5):646-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. The impact of anesthetic modality on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg. 2004 Dec; 188(6):741-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Management of complicated umbilical hernias in patients with end-stage liver disease and refractory ascites. Surgery. 2004 Jun; 135(6):679-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.