Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by LAURA PETERSEN and LECHAUNCY WOODARD.
Connection Strength
5.450
-
Impact of a Pay-for-Performance Program on Care for Black Patients with Hypertension: Important Answers in the Era of the Affordable Care Act. Health Serv Res. 2017 06; 52(3):1138-1155.
Score: 0.555
-
Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Sep 11; 310(10):1042-50.
Score: 0.458
-
Impact of clinical complexity on the quality of diabetes care. Am J Manag Care. 2012 09; 18(9):508-14.
Score: 0.426
-
Treating chronically ill people with diabetes mellitus with limited life expectancy: implications for performance measurement. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Feb; 60(2):193-201.
Score: 0.408
-
Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 03; 6:114.
Score: 0.400
-
Impact of comorbidity type on measures of quality for diabetes care. Med Care. 2011 Jun; 49(6):605-10.
Score: 0.391
-
Improving the performance of performance measurement. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb; 25(2):100-1.
Score: 0.356
-
Racial differences in attitudes regarding cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 May; 57(2):225-31.
Score: 0.256
-
Is lipid-lowering therapy underused by African Americans at high risk of coronary heart disease within the VA health care system? Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec; 94(12):2112-7.
Score: 0.249
-
Impact of Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation on Diabetes Control in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 08; 33(8):1276-1282.
Score: 0.157
-
Calculations of Financial Incentives for Providers in a Pay-for-Performance Program: Manual Review Versus Data From Structured Fields in Electronic Health Records. Med Care. 2015 Oct; 53(10):901-7.
Score: 0.132
-
Publishing protocols for partnered research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec; 29 Suppl 4:820-4.
Score: 0.124
-
Is high-intensity statin therapy associated with lower statin adherence compared with low- to moderate-intensity statin therapy? Implications of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guidelines. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Nov; 37(11):653-9.
Score: 0.123
-
Gender disparities in evidence-based statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 01; 115(1):21-6.
Score: 0.123
-
Financial incentives to control hypertension in patients--reply. JAMA. 2014 Jan 15; 311(3):303-4.
Score: 0.117
-
Correlates of repeat lipid testing in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Aug 12; 173(15):1439-44.
Score: 0.114
-
Variations in definitions of mortality have little influence on neonatal intensive care unit performance ratings. J Pediatr. 2013 Jan; 162(1):50-5.e2.
Score: 0.106
-
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reporting and goal attainment in primary care. J Clin Lipidol. 2012 Nov-Dec; 6(6):545-52.
Score: 0.104
-
Frequency and correlates of treatment intensification for elevated cholesterol levels in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2011 Oct; 162(4):725-732.e1.
Score: 0.099
-
Institutional, provider, and patient correlates of low-density lipoprotein and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment according to the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Am Heart J. 2011 Jun; 161(6):1140-6.
Score: 0.097
-
Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care. Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 09; 5:13.
Score: 0.089
-
Will hypertension performance measures used for pay-for-performance programs penalize those who care for medically complex patients? Circulation. 2009 Jun 16; 119(23):2978-85.
Score: 0.085
-
Health care funding levels and patient outcomes: a national study. Health Econ. 2007 Apr; 16(4):385-93.
Score: 0.073
-
Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15; 145(4):265-72.
Score: 0.070
-
Comparison of the predictive validity of diagnosis-based risk adjusters for clinical outcomes. Med Care. 2005 Jan; 43(1):61-7.
Score: 0.063
-
Churning the tides of care: when nurse turnover makes waves in patient access to primary care. BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 10; 23(1):739.
Score: 0.062
-
Use of smoking cessation interventions and aspirin for secondary prevention: are there racial disparities? Am J Med Qual. 2004 Jul-Aug; 19(4):166-71.
Score: 0.060
-
An evidence-based, structured, expert approach to selecting essential indicators of primary care quality. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0261263.
Score: 0.051
-
Impact of team configuration and team stability on primary care quality. Implement Sci. 2019 03 06; 14(1):22.
Score: 0.042
-
Statin Use and Its Facility-Level Variation in Patients With Diabetes: Insight From the Veterans Affairs National Database. Clin Cardiol. 2016 Apr; 39(4):185-91.
Score: 0.034
-
Barriers to non-HDL cholesterol goal attainment by providers. Am J Med. 2011 Sep; 124(9):876-80.e2.
Score: 0.025