Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by WEIMIN BI and JAMES LUPSKI.
Connection Strength

4.807
  1. Rai1 deficiency in mice causes learning impairment and motor dysfunction, whereas Rai1 heterozygous mice display minimal behavioral phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Aug 01; 16(15):1802-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.310
  2. RAI1 point mutations, CAG repeat variation, and SNP analysis in non-deletion Smith-Magenis syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 15; 140(22):2454-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  3. Inactivation of Rai1 in mice recapitulates phenotypes observed in chromosome engineered mouse models for Smith-Magenis syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Apr 15; 14(8):983-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  4. Mutations of RAI1, a PHD-containing protein, in nondeletion patients with Smith-Magenis syndrome. Hum Genet. 2004 Nov; 115(6):515-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.258
  5. Genomic Balancing Act: Deciphering DNA rearrangements in the Complex Chromosomal Aberration involving 5p15.2, 2q31.1 and 18q21.32. Res Sq. 2024 Feb 19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  6. Reciprocal crossovers and a positional preference for strand exchange in recombination events resulting in deletion or duplication of chromosome 17p11.2. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec; 73(6):1302-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  7. TCEAL1 loss-of-function results in an X-linked dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome and drives the neurological disease trait in Xq22.2 deletions. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 12 01; 109(12):2270-2282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  8. Recurring germline mosaicism in a family due to reversion of an inherited derivative chromosome 8 from an 8;21 translocation with interstitial telomeric sequences. J Med Genet. 2023 06; 60(6):547-556.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  9. Genes in a refined Smith-Magenis syndrome critical deletion interval on chromosome 17p11.2 and the syntenic region of the mouse. Genome Res. 2002 May; 12(5):713-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  10. CNVs cause autosomal recessive genetic diseases with or without involvement of SNV/indels. Genet Med. 2020 10; 22(10):1633-1641.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  11. Resolution of Disease Phenotypes Resulting from Multilocus Genomic Variation. N Engl J Med. 2017 01 05; 376(1):21-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  12. Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles. Genome Res. 2013 Sep; 23(9):1383-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  13. Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today's genomic array era? Genet Med. 2013 Jun; 15(6):450-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  14. Co-occurrence of recurrent duplications of the DiGeorge syndrome region on both chromosome 22 homologues due to inherited and de novo events. J Med Genet. 2012 Nov; 49(11):681-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  15. Detection of =1Mb microdeletions and microduplications in a single cell using custom oligonucleotide arrays. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Jan; 32(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  16. Copy number gain at Xp22.31 includes complex duplication rearrangements and recurrent triplications. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 May 15; 20(10):1975-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  17. Increased LIS1 expression affects human and mouse brain development. Nat Genet. 2009 Feb; 41(2):168-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  18. Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr; 80(4):633-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  19. Penetrance of craniofacial anomalies in mouse models of Smith-Magenis syndrome is modified by genomic sequence surrounding Rai1: not all null alleles are alike. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Mar; 80(3):518-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  20. Rai1 duplication causes physical and behavioral phenotypes in a mouse model of dup(17)(p11.2p11.2). J Clin Invest. 2006 Nov; 116(11):3035-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  21. Phenotypic characterization of Bbs4 null mice reveals age-dependent penetrance and variable expressivity. Hum Genet. 2006 Sep; 120(2):211-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  22. Reduced penetrance of craniofacial anomalies as a function of deletion size and genetic background in a chromosome engineered partial mouse model for Smith-Magenis syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Nov 01; 13(21):2613-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  23. NODAL variants are associated with a continuum of laterality defects from simple D-transposition of the great arteries to heterotaxy. Genome Med. 2024 Apr 03; 16(1):53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  24. Modeling del(17)(p11.2p11.2) and dup(17)(p11.2p11.2) contiguous gene syndromes by chromosome engineering in mice: phenotypic consequences of gene dosage imbalance. Mol Cell Biol. 2003 May; 23(10):3646-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  25. The multiple de novo copy number variant (MdnCNV) phenomenon presents with peri-zygotic DNA mutational signatures and multilocus pathogenic variation. Genome Med. 2022 10 27; 14(1):122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  26. Sequencing individual genomes with recurrent genomic disorder deletions: an approach to characterize genes for autosomal recessive rare disease traits. Genome Med. 2022 09 30; 14(1):113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  27. Structure and evolution of the Smith-Magenis syndrome repeat gene clusters, SMS-REPs. Genome Res. 2002 May; 12(5):729-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  28. Retrospective analysis of a clinical exome sequencing cohort reveals the mutational spectrum and identifies candidate disease-associated loci for BAFopathies. Genet Med. 2022 02; 24(2):364-373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  29. Integrated sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization in familial Parkinson disease. Neurol Genet. 2020 Oct; 6(5):e498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  30. Quantitative Assessment of Parental Somatic Mosaicism for Copy-Number Variant (CNV) Deletions. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2020 06; 106(1):e99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  31. Parental somatic mosaicism for CNV deletions - A need for more sensitive and precise detection methods in clinical diagnostics settings. Genomics. 2020 09; 112(5):2937-2941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  32. Reanalysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing Data. N Engl J Med. 2019 06 20; 380(25):2478-2480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  33. Phenotypic expansion in DDX3X - a common cause of intellectual disability in females. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Oct; 5(10):1277-1285.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  34. Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):663-675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  35. Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 12 04; 171(12):e173438.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  36. Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants. Genome Med. 2017 09 21; 9(1):83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  37. Erratum to: Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features. Hum Genet. 2017 08; 136(8):1009-1011.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  38. Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases. Genome Med. 2017 03 21; 9(1):26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  39. Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features. Hum Genet. 2017 04; 136(4):377-386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  40. Mechanisms for Complex Chromosomal Insertions. PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov; 12(11):e1006446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  41. Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug 07; 95(2):173-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  42. Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug; 22(8):969-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  43. Fusion of large-scale genomic knowledge and frequency data computationally prioritizes variants in epilepsy. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(9):e1003797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  44. Combined array CGH plus SNP genome analyses in a single assay for optimized clinical testing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan; 22(1):79-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  45. NAHR-mediated copy-number variants in a clinical population: mechanistic insights into both genomic disorders and Mendelizing traits. Genome Res. 2013 Sep; 23(9):1395-409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  46. A duplication CNV that conveys traits reciprocal to metabolic syndrome and protects against diet-induced obesity in mice and men. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8(5):e1002713.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  47. Small rare recurrent deletions and reciprocal duplications in 2q21.1, including brain-specific ARHGEF4 and GPR148. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 01; 21(15):3345-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  48. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  49. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell. 2011 Sep 16; 146(6):889-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  50. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by array CGH. Hum Mutat. 2010 Dec; 31(12):1326-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  51. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA. J Mol Diagn. 2009 May; 11(3):226-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  52. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.