Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DEAN SITTIG and DANIEL MURPHY.
Connection Strength
3.209
-
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 08 18; 30(9):1526-1531.
Score: 0.230
-
Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul; 29(1).
Score: 0.212
-
Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct; 28(1).
Score: 0.202
-
Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 10; 11(5):692-698.
Score: 0.189
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.176
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
Score: 0.173
-
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
Score: 0.170
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
Score: 0.164
-
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
Score: 0.154
-
Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98.
Score: 0.151
-
Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
Score: 0.147
-
Electronic Health Records Quantify Previously Existing Phenomenon-Physicians Spend Hours Coordinating Care-Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 08 01; 176(8):1235-6.
Score: 0.141
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
Score: 0.140
-
Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
Score: 0.139
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.138
-
Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4.
Score: 0.128
-
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
Score: 0.110
-
Improving the effectiveness of electronic health record-based referral processes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 13; 12:107.
Score: 0.108
-
Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
Score: 0.103
-
Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
Score: 0.103
-
Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
Score: 0.037
-
Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
Score: 0.036
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.035
-
Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
Score: 0.023