Connection

PETER HOTEZ to Health Policy

This is a "connection" page, showing publications PETER HOTEZ has written about Health Policy.
Connection Strength

4.958
  1. Wednesday, January 20, 2021. Microbes Infect. 2021 Jan-Feb; 23(1):104775.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.570
  2. Central Latin America: Two decades of challenges in neglected tropical disease control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 03; 14(3):e0007962.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.545
  3. Globalists versus nationalists: Bridging the divide through blue marble health. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 07; 13(7):e0007156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  4. Minutes to midnight: Turning back the Doomsday Clock through neglected disease vaccine diplomacy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 09; 12(9):e0006676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.490
  5. Blue Marble Health and the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Oct; 10(10):e0004744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.430
  6. "Vaccine diplomacy": historical perspectives and future directions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun; 8(6):e2808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.366
  7. NTDs V.2.0: "blue marble health"--neglected tropical disease control and elimination in a shifting health policy landscape. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Nov; 7(11):e2570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  8. The global health crisis and our nation's research universities. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Feb 23; 4(2):e635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.271
  9. Neglected diseases amid wealth in the United States and Europe. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec; 28(6):1720-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  10. New vaccines for developing countries: will it be feast or famine? Am J Law Med. 2009; 35(2-3):311-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  11. The 2016 California policy to eliminate nonmedical vaccine exemptions and changes in vaccine coverage: An empirical policy analysis. PLoS Med. 2019 12; 16(12):e1002994.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  12. The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties. PLoS Med. 2018 06; 15(6):e1002578.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  13. Zika in the United States of America and a Fateful 1969 Decision. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 05; 10(5):e0004765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  14. Noncommunicable Diseases: A Globalization of Disparity? PLoS Med. 2015 Jul; 12(7):e1001859.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  15. Blue marble health: a call for papers. PLoS Med. 2014 Jul; 11(7):e1001682.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  16. Texas and Mexico: sharing a legacy of poverty and neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6(3):e1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  17. Unleashing "civilian power": a new American diplomacy through neglected tropical disease control, elimination, research, and development. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun; 5(6):e1134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  18. Incorporating a rapid-impact package for neglected tropical diseases with programs for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. PLoS Med. 2006 Jan; 3(5):e102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  19. "Rapid-impact interventions": how a policy of integrated control for Africa's neglected tropical diseases could benefit the poor. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov; 2(11):e336.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. The public health crisis of underimmunisation: a global plan of action. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 01; 20(1):e11-e16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  21. What Is the Value of Different Zika Vaccination Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate Zika Outbreaks? J Infect Dis. 2019 08 09; 220(6):920-931.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  22. United States military tropical medicine: extraordinary legacy, uncertain future. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(12):e2448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  23. Health innovation networks to help developing countries address neglected diseases. Science. 2005 Jul 15; 309(5733):401-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.