Header Logo

Connection

LI WANG to Adult

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LI WANG has written about Adult.
LI WANG
Connection Strength
0.354
Adult
  1. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec; 38(12):2080-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  2. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov; 37(11):2018-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  3. Total corneal power estimation: ray tracing method versus gaussian optics formula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 25; 52(3):1716-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  4. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep; 36(9):1466-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  5. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar; 36(3):425-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. Custom selection of aspheric intraocular lenses after wavefront-guided myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jan; 36(1):73-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  7. Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with prior radial keratotomy: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009 Sep; 116(9):1688-1696.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  8. Residual higher-order aberrations caused by clinically measured cyclotorsional misalignment or decentration during wavefront-guided excimer laser corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec; 34(12):2057-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  9. Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Oct; 33(10):1713-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Fitting behaviors of Fourier transform and Zernike polynomials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jun; 33(6):999-1004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 105:36-41; discussion 41-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. Effect of decentration of wavefront-corrected intraocular lenses on the higher-order aberrations of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep; 123(9):1226-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Higher-order aberrations from the internal optics of the eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Aug; 31(8):1512-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov; 138(5):897; author reply 897.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  15. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct; 111(10):1825-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  16. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 102:189-96; discussion 196-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Ocular higher-order aberrations in individuals screened for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct; 29(10):1896-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug; 29(8):1514-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May; 29(5):970-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  20. Methods of estimating corneal refractive power after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jun; 28(6):954-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  21. Effect of the equivalent refractive index on intraocular lens power prediction with ray tracing after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 May; 41(5):1030-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. Prediction of refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 May; 41(5):936-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Cornea. 2013 Dec; 32(12):1544-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul; 251(7):1855-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  26. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  27. Accuracy of modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas in refractive lens exchange for high myopia and high hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jul; 35(7):1181-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  28. Size of corneal topographic effective optical zone: comparison of standard and customized myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug; 142(2):227-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  29. Anterior lenticonus detected by wavefront aberrometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov; 140(5):921-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr; 109(4):651-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. Keratoconus evaluation using the Orbscan Topography System. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Feb; 26(2):222-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.