DONALD PARSONS to Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DONALD PARSONS has written about Neoplasms.
Connection Strength
2.470
-
Recent Advancements and Innovations in Pediatric Precision Oncology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2024 07 01; 46(5):262-271.
Score: 0.332
-
Phase II Study of Ulixertinib in Children and Young Adults With Tumors Harboring Activating Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Alterations: APEC1621J of the National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric MATCH Trial. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Jun; 8:e2400103.
Score: 0.331
-
Actionable Tumor Alterations and Treatment Protocol Enrollment of Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Refractory Cancers in the National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric MATCH Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 07 10; 40(20):2224-2234.
Score: 0.285
-
Clinical tumor sequencing: an incidental casualty of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations for reporting of incidental findings. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20; 32(21):2203-5.
Score: 0.166
-
Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Germline Exome Versus Panel Sequencing in the Diverse Population of the Texas KidsCanSeq Pediatric Cancer Study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep; 8:e2400187.
Score: 0.084
-
Phase II Study of Samotolisib in Children and Young Adults With Tumors Harboring Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway Alterations: Pediatric MATCH APEC1621D. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep; 8:e2400258.
Score: 0.084
-
Phase II study of vemurafenib in children and young adults with tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations: NCI-COG pediatric MATCH trial (APEC1621) Arm G. Oncologist. 2024 Aug 05; 29(8):723-e1093.
Score: 0.084
-
Olaparib for childhood tumors harboring defects in DNA damage repair genes: arm H of the NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial. Oncologist. 2024 Jul 05; 29(7):638-e952.
Score: 0.083
-
Paediatric strategy forum for medicinal product development of PI3-K, mTOR, AKT and GSK3? inhibitors in children and adolescents with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2024 Aug; 207:114145.
Score: 0.083
-
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
Score: 0.083
-
Families' experiences accessing care after genomic sequencing in the pediatric cancer context: "It's just been a big juggle". J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec; 33(6):1337-1350.
Score: 0.081
-
Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Developmental therapeutics. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 09; 70 Suppl 6:e30563.
Score: 0.078
-
Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
Score: 0.075
-
A Validation Framework for Somatic Copy Number Detection in Targeted Sequencing Panels. J Mol Diagn. 2022 07; 24(7):760-774.
Score: 0.072
-
Inferring clonal composition from multiple tumor biopsies. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2020 08 25; 6(1):27.
Score: 0.064
-
Precision Medicine in Pediatric Oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2020 01; 29(1):63-72.
Score: 0.060
-
Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 04; 102(4):680-686.
Score: 0.056
-
Target and Agent Prioritization for the Children's Oncology Group-National Cancer Institute Pediatric MATCH Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 05 01; 109(5).
Score: 0.051
-
Pediatric oncology enters an era of precision medicine. Curr Probl Cancer. 2017 May - Jun; 41(3):194-200.
Score: 0.050
-
Somatic cancer variant curation and harmonization through consensus minimum variant level data. Genome Med. 2016 11 04; 8(1):117.
Score: 0.049
-
Precision medicine in pediatric oncology: Lessons learned and next steps. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 03; 64(3).
Score: 0.049
-
Germline Findings in Tumor-Only Sequencing: Points to Consider for Clinicians and Laboratories. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr; 108(4).
Score: 0.046
-
Is Whole-Exome Sequencing an Ethically Disruptive Technology? Perspectives of Pediatric Oncologists and Parents of Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Mar; 63(3):511-5.
Score: 0.046
-
Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject. J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43(3):529-37.
Score: 0.043
-
Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
Score: 0.015
-
Portero versus portador: Spanish interpretation of genomic terminology during whole exome sequencing results disclosure. Per Med. 2017 11; 14(6):503-514.
Score: 0.013
-
IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19; 360(8):765-73.
Score: 0.007