Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DAVID BATES and DEAN SITTIG.
Connection Strength
1.153
-
Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020 03; 26(1):181-189.
Score: 0.165
-
Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):496-506.
Score: 0.159
-
Methods for Detecting Malfunctions in Clinical Decision Support Systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:1385.
Score: 0.145
-
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 11; 23(6):1068-1076.
Score: 0.137
-
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
Score: 0.131
-
Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec; 19(6):980-7.
Score: 0.106
-
Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr; 42(2):334-46.
Score: 0.082
-
Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep; 15(9):626-31.
Score: 0.047
-
A computer-based outpatient clinical referral system. Int J Med Inform. 1999 Aug; 55(2):149-58.
Score: 0.043
-
Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):575-584.
Score: 0.040
-
Design and development of a computer-based clinical referral system for use within a physician hospital organization. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998; 52 Pt 1:98-102.
Score: 0.039
-
A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):432-440.
Score: 0.037
-
Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr; 18(2):187-94.
Score: 0.024