DAVID BATES to Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions.
Connection Strength
13.629
-
Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenomic Data Collected by a Health-System Biobank to Predict and Prevent Adverse Drug Events. Drug Saf. 2021 05; 44(5):601-607.
Score: 0.606
-
Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Drug Saf. 2019 04; 42(4):573-579.
Score: 0.531
-
The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 09 01; 25(9):1183-1188.
Score: 0.510
-
Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):718-724.
Score: 0.491
-
Evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2017 06; 39:156-161.
Score: 0.459
-
Evaluation of Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan; 124(1):25-34.
Score: 0.424
-
To err is human: lessons from patient safety research for transplant care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 May; 9(5):845-7.
Score: 0.377
-
Impact of vendor computerized physician order entry on patients with renal impairment in community hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2013 Oct; 8(10):545-52.
Score: 0.363
-
Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul; 39(7):312-8.
Score: 0.356
-
Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e85-90.
Score: 0.352
-
Overrides of clinical decision support alerts in primary care clinics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:923.
Score: 0.344
-
Understanding responses to a renal dosing decision support system in primary care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:931.
Score: 0.344
-
Active pharmacovigilance and healthcare utilization. Am J Manag Care. 2012 11 01; 18(11):e423-8.
Score: 0.340
-
The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Mar; 38(3):120-6.
Score: 0.325
-
Impact of vendor computerized physician order entry in community hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul; 27(7):801-7.
Score: 0.323
-
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):91-6.
Score: 0.288
-
Adverse drug event rates in six community hospitals and the potential impact of computerized physician order entry for prevention. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan; 25(1):31-8.
Score: 0.277
-
Measuring patient safety: the need for prospective detection of adverse events. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 148:3.
Score: 0.261
-
Adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Sep-Oct; 7(5):383-9.
Score: 0.238
-
Drug withdrawals in the United States: a systematic review of the evidence and analysis of trends. Curr Drug Saf. 2007 Sep; 2(3):177-85.
Score: 0.238
-
Medication safety in a psychiatric hospital. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr; 29(2):156-62.
Score: 0.230
-
Pediatric medication safety and the media: what does the public see? Pediatrics. 2006 Jun; 117(6):1907-14.
Score: 0.218
-
Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13; 166(5):565-71.
Score: 0.215
-
Adherence to black box warnings for prescription medications in outpatients. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13; 166(3):338-44.
Score: 0.214
-
Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24; 165(2):234-40.
Score: 0.199
-
Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. Drug Saf. 2025 Apr; 48(4):363-374.
Score: 0.197
-
Strategies for detecting adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):492-8.
Score: 0.192
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug; 13(4):306-14.
Score: 0.192
-
Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17; 348(16):1556-64.
Score: 0.176
-
Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jul-Aug; 10(4):339-50.
Score: 0.175
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003 Mar 05; 289(9):1107-16.
Score: 0.174
-
The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 04; 138(3):161-7.
Score: 0.173
-
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2023 01 12; 388(2):142-153.
Score: 0.173
-
Heterogeneity of Drug Allergies and Reaction Lists in Two U.S. Health Care Systems' Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 05; 13(3):741-751.
Score: 0.165
-
Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective. Drug Saf. 2022 05; 45(5):449-458.
Score: 0.165
-
Key use cases for artificial intelligence to reduce the frequency of adverse drug events: a scoping review. Lancet Digit Health. 2022 02; 4(2):e137-e148.
Score: 0.159
-
Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 06 12; 28(6):1081-1087.
Score: 0.155
-
Costs of drug-related morbidity and mortality: enormous and growing rapidly. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 Mar-Apr; 41(2):156-7.
Score: 0.152
-
Preventable medication errors: identifying and eliminating serious drug interactions. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 Mar-Apr; 41(2):159-60.
Score: 0.152
-
Identifying hospital admissions due to adverse drug events using a computer-based monitor. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Mar-Apr; 10(2):113-9.
Score: 0.152
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 01; 109(2):87-94.
Score: 0.146
-
Identifying drug safety issues: from research to practice. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Feb; 12(1):69-76.
Score: 0.141
-
Medication errors and adverse drug events in a UK hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions: a prospective observational study. Lancet Digit Health. 2019 12; 1(8):e403-e412.
Score: 0.138
-
Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999 Jul 21; 282(3):267-70.
Score: 0.136
-
Frequency, consequences and prevention of adverse drug events. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Mar; 19(1):13-7.
Score: 0.132
-
Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 02; 34(2):285-292.
Score: 0.128
-
A value set for documenting adverse reactions in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 06 01; 25(6):661-669.
Score: 0.125
-
Reduced Effectiveness of Interruptive Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts after Conversion to a Commercial Electronic Health Record. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 11; 33(11):1868-1876.
Score: 0.125
-
The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1997 Jan 22-29; 277(4):307-11.
Score: 0.114
-
Ambulatory Computerized Prescribing and Preventable Adverse Drug Events. J Patient Saf. 2016 06; 12(2):69-74.
Score: 0.109
-
Pharmacosurveillance without borders: electronic health records in different countries can be used to address important methodological issues in estimating the risk of adverse events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 09; 77:101-111.
Score: 0.109
-
Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):29-34.
Score: 0.102
-
Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr; 10(4):199-205.
Score: 0.101
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors in Japanese paediatric inpatients: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct; 23(10):830-7.
Score: 0.094
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun; 8(6):289-94.
Score: 0.089
-
Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Nov; 21(11):1221-6.
Score: 0.084
-
Preventable adverse drug events and their causes and contributing factors: the analysis of register data. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr; 23(2):187-97.
Score: 0.075
-
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
Score: 0.075
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors in psychiatry: methodological issues regarding identification and classification. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 9(1):24-33.
Score: 0.061
-
Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19; 145(6):426-34.
Score: 0.056
-
The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug; 33(8):1694-700.
Score: 0.051
-
Multifaceted approach to reducing preventable adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Mar 15; 60(6):582-6.
Score: 0.044
-
Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr; 10(2):115-28.
Score: 0.044
-
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(4):313-21.
Score: 0.034
-
Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21; 280(15):1311-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug; 25(8):1289-97.
Score: 0.030
-
Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):35-43.
Score: 0.026
-
A safe practice standard for barcode technology. J Patient Saf. 2015 Jun; 11(2):89-99.
Score: 0.025
-
Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 01; 20(10):e445-52.
Score: 0.024
-
Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Sep-Oct; 1(5):404-11.
Score: 0.024
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 06; 362(18):1698-707.
Score: 0.018
-
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug; 15(4):424-9.
Score: 0.016
-
Computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support in the long-term care setting: insights from the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct; 53(10):1780-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the incidence of medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events in a hospital pharmacy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1085.
Score: 0.012
-
Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):482-91.
Score: 0.012
-
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct; 21(10):541-8.
Score: 0.007
-
A new knowledge structure for drug-drug interactions. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 836-40.
Score: 0.006