Connection

DAVID BATES to Patient Safety

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Patient Safety.
Connection Strength

10.309
  1. Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Nov 13; 387:e080480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.688
  2. Understanding the Concept of Patient Safety Culture: Constitutive and Operational Definitions for Health Care Organizations. J Nurs Care Qual. 2025 Jan-Mar 01; 40(1):E8-E14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  3. Improving medication safety in both adults and children: what will it take? BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19; 33(10):619-621.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.681
  4. The Safety of Outpatient Health Care : Review of Electronic Health Records. Ann Intern Med. 2024 06; 177(6):738-748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.664
  5. The Safety of Inpatient Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2023 01 12; 388(2):142-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.606
  6. Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Real-Time Safety Reporting by Hospitalized Patients and Their Care Partners: The MySafeCare Application. J Patient Saf. 2020 06; 16(2):e75-e81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  7. National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  8. Patient Safety As A Priority: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 04; 38(4):693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.466
  9. Priorities In Patient Safety: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 02; 38(2):330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.461
  10. Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  11. Finding patients before they crash: the next major opportunity to improve patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan; 24(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  12. Evaluation of use of electronic patient controlled analgesia pumps to improve patient safety in an academic medical center. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 201:153-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  13. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct; 22(10):809-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.318
  14. Safety of Health Care in the Inpatient Setting. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 20; 388(16):1536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  15. Impact of Teamwork and Communication Training Interventions on Safety Culture and Patient Safety in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review. J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 01; 18(1):e351-e361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  16. Use of a perceived efficacy tool to evaluate the FallTIPS program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 12; 69(12):3595-3601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  17. Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2025889.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  18. The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 08 01; 27(8):1252-1258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  19. Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 10; 29(10):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  20. Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 02 01; 27(2):301-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  21. Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 01; 11(1):34-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  22. Systems engineering and human factors support of a system of novel EHR-integrated tools to prevent harm in the hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 06 01; 26(6):553-560.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  23. Patient Harms: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 03; 38(3):511.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  24. Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020 03; 26(1):181-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  25. Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  26. Errors and discrepancies in the administration of intravenous infusions: a mixed methods multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 11; 27(11):892-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  27. Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):710-717.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  28. Prospective Evaluation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Intensive Care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug; 45(8):e806-e813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  29. Many Mobile Health Apps Target High-Need, High-Cost Populations, But Gaps Remain. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 12 01; 35(12):2310-2318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  30. Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int J Med Inform. 2017 01; 97:1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  31. Digital Health and Patient Safety. JAMA. 2016 Apr 26; 315(16):1697-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  32. How safe is primary care? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 07; 25(7):544-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  33. Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May; 25(5):315-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  34. A safe practice standard for barcode technology. J Patient Saf. 2015 Jun; 11(2):89-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  35. A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  36. Evaluating ambulatory practice safety: the PROMISES project administrators and practice staff surveys. Med Care. 2015 Feb; 53(2):141-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  37. Conflict of interest, Dr Charles Denham and the Journal of Patient Safety. J Patient Saf. 2014 Dec; 10(4):181-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  38. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  39. Case studies of patient safety research classics to build research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 39(12):553-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  40. Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi exercise. PLoS Med. 2013 Nov; 10(11):e1001554.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  41. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 2):365-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  42. National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  43. Overrides of clinical decision support alerts in primary care clinics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:923.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  44. An exploration of safety climate in nursing homes. J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep; 8(3):104-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  45. Core competencies for patient safety research: a cornerstone for global capacity strengthening. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jan; 20(1):96-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  46. Patient safety research: an overview of the global evidence. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb; 19(1):42-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  47. Measures of patient safety in developing and emerging countries: a review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb; 19(1):48-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  48. Comparison of a Voluntary Safety Reporting System to a Global Trigger Tool for Identifying Adverse Events in an Oncology Population. J Patient Saf. 2022 09 01; 18(6):611-616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  49. Assessing the cognitive and work load of an inpatient safety dashboard in the context of opioid management. Appl Ergon. 2020 May; 85:103047.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  50. Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 05 14; 321(18):1780-1787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  51. Incorporating medication indications into the prescribing process. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 06 01; 75(11):774-783.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  52. Randomized Trial of Reducing Ambulatory Malpractice and Safety Risk: Results of the Massachusetts PROMISES Project. Med Care. 2017 08; 55(8):797-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  53. Computerized prescriber order entry-related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):316-322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  54. A Single-Center Multidisciplinary Initiative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates: Quality and Financial Implications. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Jul-Sep; 34(3):218-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  55. Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):473-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.