DAVID BATES to Attitude to Computers
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Attitude to Computers.
Connection Strength
4.642
-
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
Score: 0.481
-
Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(3):789-801.
Score: 0.460
-
Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug; 18(4):479-84.
Score: 0.366
-
Patients' attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Aug 06; 11(3):e30.
Score: 0.324
-
Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16(2):129-37.
Score: 0.290
-
Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
Score: 0.271
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec; 13(6):619-26.
Score: 0.264
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld PDA clinical reference applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1099.
Score: 0.236
-
Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88.
Score: 0.235
-
Who adopts a patient portal?: An application of the diffusion of innovation model. J Innov Health Inform. 2018 Oct 25; 25(3):149-157.
Score: 0.153
-
Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 10; 8(4):1044-1053.
Score: 0.145
-
Awareness and Use of the After-Visit Summary Through a Patient Portal: Evaluation of Patient Characteristics and an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 13; 18(4):e77.
Score: 0.129
-
Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Jan-Feb; 3(1):42-55.
Score: 0.126
-
Lessons learned from implementation of computerized provider order entry in 5 community hospitals: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jun 24; 13:67.
Score: 0.106
-
Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):541-4.
Score: 0.096
-
Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):610-4.
Score: 0.096
-
Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb; 15(1):158-63.
Score: 0.076
-
Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7.
Score: 0.073
-
Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12; 167(5):507-12.
Score: 0.069
-
Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb; 14(1):110-7.
Score: 0.067
-
Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):5-11.
Score: 0.062
-
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(4):431-7.
Score: 0.060
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 961.
Score: 0.059
-
Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1147.
Score: 0.059
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.057
-
A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1166-70.
Score: 0.055
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.053
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 848.
Score: 0.051
-
Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun; 9(3):223-9.
Score: 0.049
-
Top ten challenges when interfacing a laboratory information system to an electronic health record: Experience at a large academic medical center. Int J Med Inform. 2017 10; 106:9-16.
Score: 0.035
-
Do minority-serving physicians have comparable rates of use of electronic health records? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 993.
Score: 0.018
-
Improving override rates for computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1110.
Score: 0.015
-
Detecting alerts, notifying the physician, and offering action items: a comprehensive alerting system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996; 704-8.
Score: 0.008