DAVID BATES to Academic Medical Centers
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Academic Medical Centers.
Connection Strength
2.331
-
Why do we still page each other? Examining the frequency, types and senders of pages in academic medical services. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 01; 26(1):24-29.
Score: 0.426
-
Resource utilization among patients with sepsis syndrome. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Jan; 24(1):62-70.
Score: 0.173
-
Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 06 12; 28(6):1081-1087.
Score: 0.155
-
High-priority drug-drug interaction clinical decision support overrides in a newly implemented commercial computerized provider order-entry system: Override appropriateness and adverse drug events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 06 01; 27(6):893-900.
Score: 0.145
-
Wide variation and patterns of physicians' responses to drug-drug interaction alerts. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Mar 01; 31(2):89-95.
Score: 0.133
-
Top ten challenges when interfacing a laboratory information system to an electronic health record: Experience at a large academic medical center. Int J Med Inform. 2017 10; 106:9-16.
Score: 0.118
-
Relationship between documentation method and quality of chronic disease visit notes. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(2):480-90.
Score: 0.095
-
Evaluation of use of electronic patient controlled analgesia pumps to improve patient safety in an academic medical center. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 201:153-9.
Score: 0.093
-
Evaluation of intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps in an academic medical center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1089-98.
Score: 0.092
-
The patient satisfaction chasm: the gap between hospital management and frontline clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar; 22(3):242-50.
Score: 0.086
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.074
-
Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr; 23(4):429-41.
Score: 0.062
-
Inpatient Imaging Utilization and Radiology Workload: Trends of the Past Decade and Through the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Sep; 22(9):979-989.
Score: 0.051
-
Severe sepsis: variation in resource and therapeutic modality use among academic centers. Crit Care. 2003 Jun; 7(3):R24-34.
Score: 0.044
-
Examination of Stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health Record. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144967.
Score: 0.040
-
Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct; 16(10):663-7.
Score: 0.040
-
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 02 01; 27(2):301-307.
Score: 0.035
-
Outcomes of care and resource utilization among patients with knee or shoulder disorders treated by general internists, rheumatologists, or orthopedic surgeons. Am J Med. 2000 Jan; 108(1):28-35.
Score: 0.035
-
Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Nov-Dec; 6(6):512-22.
Score: 0.035
-
Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 05 14; 321(18):1780-1787.
Score: 0.034
-
How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Jan-Feb; 5(1):112-9.
Score: 0.031
-
Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):394-397.
Score: 0.029
-
The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 01; 125(1):8-18.
Score: 0.028
-
Ambulatory Computerized Prescribing and Preventable Adverse Drug Events. J Patient Saf. 2016 06; 12(2):69-74.
Score: 0.027
-
The frequency of inappropriate nonformulary medication alert overrides in the inpatient setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 09; 23(5):924-33.
Score: 0.027
-
A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
Score: 0.025
-
Clinical Workflow Observations to Identify Opportunities for Nurse, Physicians and Patients to Share a Patient-centered Plan of Care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2014:414-23.
Score: 0.025
-
Causes and patterns of readmissions in patients with common comorbidities: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2013 Dec 16; 347:f7171.
Score: 0.023
-
Incidence, outcomes, and comparisons across definitions of AKI in hospitalized individuals. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jan; 9(1):12-20.
Score: 0.023
-
Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349.
Score: 0.021
-
Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jun; 133(6):870-7.
Score: 0.018
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 06; 362(18):1698-707.
Score: 0.018
-
Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
Score: 0.018
-
Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb; 16(1):40-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):261-6.
Score: 0.013
-
How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Feb; 32(2):73-80.
Score: 0.013
-
Relationship of pulmonary artery catheter use to mortality and resource utilization in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec; 31(12):2734-41.
Score: 0.012