DAVID BATES to Patient Satisfaction
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Patient Satisfaction.
Connection Strength
3.066
-
The role of social media around patient experience and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 10; 26(10):845-848.
Score: 0.415
-
The patient satisfaction chasm: the gap between hospital management and frontline clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar; 22(3):242-50.
Score: 0.306
-
Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov; 20(11):959-65.
Score: 0.282
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.262
-
Patient-reported service quality on a medicine unit. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Apr; 18(2):95-101.
Score: 0.188
-
Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1147.
Score: 0.177
-
Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct; 16(10):663-7.
Score: 0.141
-
Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 11 03; 324(17):1737-1746.
Score: 0.133
-
Drug complications in outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Mar; 15(3):149-54.
Score: 0.126
-
Prospective Evaluation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Intensive Care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug; 45(8):e806-e813.
Score: 0.106
-
Increased Patient Satisfaction and a Reduction in Pre-Analytical Errors Following Implementation of an Electronic Specimen Collection Module in Outpatient Phlebotomy. Lab Med. 2017 Aug 01; 48(3):282-289.
Score: 0.106
-
Patient Relationship Management: What the U.S. Healthcare System Can Learn from Other Industries. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 01; 32(1):101-104.
Score: 0.099
-
Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun; 13(3):185-96.
Score: 0.095
-
Increasing patient engagement: patients' responses to viewing problem lists online. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(4):930-42.
Score: 0.088
-
Clinicians' perspectives on patient satisfaction in adult congenital heart disease clinics--a dimension of health care quality whose time has come. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr; 10(2):128-36.
Score: 0.085
-
Patient-centered medical home transformation with payment reform: patient experience outcomes. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(1):26-33.
Score: 0.082
-
The impact of medical informatics on patient satisfaction: a USA-based literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar; 82(3):141-58.
Score: 0.077
-
Do medical inpatients who report poor service quality experience more adverse events and medical errors? Med Care. 2008 Feb; 46(2):224-8.
Score: 0.055
-
Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16(2):129-37.
Score: 0.054
-
Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12; 167(20):2233-9.
Score: 0.054
-
What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):830-6.
Score: 0.046
-
Can history and physical examination be used as markers of quality? An analysis of the initial visit note in musculoskeletal care. Med Care. 2000 Apr; 38(4):383-91.
Score: 0.032
-
Outcomes of care and resource utilization among patients with knee or shoulder disorders treated by general internists, rheumatologists, or orthopedic surgeons. Am J Med. 2000 Jan; 108(1):28-35.
Score: 0.031
-
Costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction by provider type for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a critical review of the literature and proposed methodologic standards. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 01; 127(1):52-60.
Score: 0.026