Connection

DAVID BATES to Delivery of Health Care

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Delivery of Health Care.
Connection Strength

5.467
  1. The Safety of Inpatient Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2023 01 12; 388(2):142-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.563
  2. Reporting and Implementing Interventions Involving Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S137-S144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  3. Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S130-S136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  4. Potential of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient Portal for Improving Care Plan Concordance during Acute Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 05; 10(3):358-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  5. Medical Innovation: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 08 01; 36(8):1519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  6. The role of social media around patient experience and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 10; 26(10):845-848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.378
  7. Innovative Environments In Health Care: Where And How New Approaches To Care Are Succeeding. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 03 01; 36(3):400-407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  8. Integrating Predictive Analytics Into High-Value Care: The Dawn of Precision Delivery. JAMA. 2016 Feb 16; 315(7):651-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  9. Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1123-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  10. Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 01; 31(9):2147-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  11. The Internet as a vehicle to communicate health information during a public health emergency: a survey analysis involving the anthrax scare of 2001. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Mar 03; 6(1):e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  12. Safety of Health Care in the Inpatient Setting. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 20; 388(16):1536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  13. The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23; 2:7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  14. What counts as a voiceable concern in decisions about speaking out in hospitals: A qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 04; 27(2):88-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  15. The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part I. Information systems for medical transactions. MedGenMed. 2000 Feb 07; 2(1):E14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  16. Using information systems to improve practice. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Dec 11; 129(49):1913-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  17. Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 01; 38(1):115-123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  18. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 01; 7(1):103-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  19. Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  20. Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(2):416-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  21. National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  22. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  23. Assessing the potential of GPT-4 to perpetuate racial and gender biases in health care: a model evaluation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2024 01; 6(1):e12-e22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Digital healthcare equity in primary care: implementing an integrated digital health navigator. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 04 19; 30(5):965-970.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  25. Using Twitter data to understand public perceptions of approved versus off-label use for COVID-19-related medications. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 09 12; 29(10):1668-1678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  26. Heterogeneity of Drug Allergies and Reaction Lists in Two U.S. Health Care Systems' Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 05; 13(3):741-751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Allergy Safety Events in Health Care: Development and Application of a Classification Schema Based on Retrospective Review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 07; 10(7):1844-1855.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  28. Health Care Equity in the Use of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 10; 36(10):3188-3193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  29. Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 10; 29(10):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  30. A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  31. A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22; 183(5):E281-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  32. Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. Defining the priorities and challenges for the adoption of Information Technology in HealthCare: opinions from an expert panel. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 881.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.