DAVID BATES to Delivery of Health Care
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Delivery of Health Care.
Connection Strength
7.378
-
A Multiyear Survey Evaluating Clinician Electronic Health Record Satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 08; 14(4):632-643.
Score: 0.546
-
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2023 01 12; 388(2):142-153.
Score: 0.524
-
Transformational improvement in quality care and health systems: the next decade. BMC Med. 2020 10 29; 18(1):340.
Score: 0.450
-
Reporting and Implementing Interventions Involving Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S137-S144.
Score: 0.437
-
Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S130-S136.
Score: 0.437
-
Potential of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient Portal for Improving Care Plan Concordance during Acute Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 05; 10(3):358-366.
Score: 0.408
-
Medical Innovation: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 08 01; 36(8):1519.
Score: 0.359
-
The role of social media around patient experience and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 10; 26(10):845-848.
Score: 0.352
-
Innovative Environments In Health Care: Where And How New Approaches To Care Are Succeeding. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 03 01; 36(3):400-407.
Score: 0.349
-
Patient Relationship Management: What the U.S. Healthcare System Can Learn from Other Industries. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 01; 32(1):101-104.
Score: 0.336
-
Integrating Predictive Analytics Into High-Value Care: The Dawn of Precision Delivery. JAMA. 2016 Feb 16; 315(7):651-2.
Score: 0.325
-
Re: A systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr; 28(2):264.
Score: 0.324
-
Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1123-31.
Score: 0.290
-
Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 01; 31(9):2147-2150.
Score: 0.147
-
The Internet as a vehicle to communicate health information during a public health emergency: a survey analysis involving the anthrax scare of 2001. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Mar 03; 6(1):e8.
Score: 0.142
-
Safety of Health Care in the Inpatient Setting. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2023 04 20; 388(16):1536.
Score: 0.133
-
The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23; 2:7.
Score: 0.129
-
What counts as a voiceable concern in decisions about speaking out in hospitals: A qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 04; 27(2):88-95.
Score: 0.122
-
Direct-to-consumer digital health. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 04; 2(4):e163-e165.
Score: 0.108
-
The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part I. Information systems for medical transactions. MedGenMed. 2000 Feb 07; 2(1):E14.
Score: 0.107
-
Using information systems to improve practice. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Dec 11; 129(49):1913-9.
Score: 0.106
-
The number needed to benefit: estimating the value of predictive analytics in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 12 01; 26(12):1655-1659.
Score: 0.106
-
Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 01; 38(1):115-123.
Score: 0.099
-
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 01; 7(1):103-111.
Score: 0.096
-
The Obesity Epidemic and the Potential of Augmented Reality Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Feb 01; 8(2):612-616.
Score: 0.087
-
How to do better health reform: a snapshot of change and improvement initiatives in the health systems of 30 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 01; 28(6):843-846.
Score: 0.086
-
Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
Score: 0.083
-
Preparing British Military nurses to deliver nursing care on deployment. An Afghanistan study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan; 35(1):104-12.
Score: 0.073
-
Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(2):416-29.
Score: 0.072
-
National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
Score: 0.065
-
The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18.
Score: 0.038
-
A qualitative study of leaders' experiences of handling challenges and changes induced by the COVID-19 pandemic in rural nursing homes and homecare services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 09; 24(1):442.
Score: 0.036
-
Patient Safety and Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Care. JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 02; 5(2):e235514.
Score: 0.035
-
Assessing the potential of GPT-4 to perpetuate racial and gender biases in health care: a model evaluation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2024 01; 6(1):e12-e22.
Score: 0.035
-
Disparity dashboards: an evaluation of the literature and framework for health equity improvement. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 11; 5(11):e831-e839.
Score: 0.035
-
A resilience perspective on healthcare personnels' experiences of managing the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Norwegian nursing homes and come care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 28; 23(1):1177.
Score: 0.035
-
Digital healthcare equity in primary care: implementing an integrated digital health navigator. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 04 19; 30(5):965-970.
Score: 0.033
-
Using Twitter data to understand public perceptions of approved versus off-label use for COVID-19-related medications. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 09 12; 29(10):1668-1678.
Score: 0.032
-
Heterogeneity of Drug Allergies and Reaction Lists in Two U.S. Health Care Systems' Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 05; 13(3):741-751.
Score: 0.031
-
Allergy Safety Events in Health Care: Development and Application of a Classification Schema Based on Retrospective Review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 07; 10(7):1844-1855.e3.
Score: 0.031
-
Health Care Equity in the Use of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 10; 36(10):3188-3193.
Score: 0.029
-
The role of the informal and formal organisation in voice about concerns in healthcare: A qualitative interview study. Soc Sci Med. 2021 07; 280:114050.
Score: 0.029
-
Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 10; 29(10):1-2.
Score: 0.027
-
A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
Score: 0.019
-
A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22; 183(5):E281-8.
Score: 0.014
-
Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Defining the priorities and challenges for the adoption of Information Technology in HealthCare: opinions from an expert panel. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 881.
Score: 0.008