DAVID BATES to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about United States.
Connection Strength
3.133
-
Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Nov 13; 387:e080480.
Score: 0.082
-
Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 01; 31(9):2147-2150.
Score: 0.081
-
Cost of Inpatient Falls and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementation of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Program. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 01 06; 4(1):e225125.
Score: 0.072
-
The Association of the First Surge of the COVID-19 Pandemic with the High- and Low-Value Outpatient Care Delivered to Adults in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(15):3979-3988.
Score: 0.070
-
Digital Inclusion as Health Care - Supporting Health Care Equity with Digital-Infrastructure Initiatives. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24; 386(12):1101-1103.
Score: 0.068
-
Development of four electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) for use in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:408-417.
Score: 0.068
-
The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 01; 12(1):153-163.
Score: 0.063
-
Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 11 03; 324(17):1737-1746.
Score: 0.062
-
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 08 01; 27(8):1252-1258.
Score: 0.061
-
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
Score: 0.060
-
Technology-facilitated care coordination in rural areas: What is needed? Int J Med Inform. 2020 05; 137:104102.
Score: 0.059
-
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 01; 29(1):52-59.
Score: 0.057
-
Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed? JAMA. 2018 11 20; 320(19):1975-1976.
Score: 0.054
-
The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 09 01; 25(9):1183-1188.
Score: 0.053
-
Interoperability: What Is It, How Can We Make It Work for Clinicians, and How Should We Measure It in the Future? Health Serv Res. 2018 10; 53(5):3270-3277.
Score: 0.051
-
The role of social media around patient experience and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 10; 26(10):845-848.
Score: 0.048
-
The Big Phish: Cyberattacks Against U.S. Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1115-8.
Score: 0.047
-
Care coordination gaps due to lack of interoperability in the United States: a qualitative study and literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 22; 16:143.
Score: 0.045
-
Evaluation of Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan; 124(1):25-34.
Score: 0.044
-
Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701.
Score: 0.042
-
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
Score: 0.042
-
Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):8-9.
Score: 0.040
-
A patient-centered longitudinal care plan: vision versus reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1082-90.
Score: 0.040
-
Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1123-31.
Score: 0.040
-
A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e181-4.
Score: 0.039
-
Disclosing medical errors: the view from the USA. Surgeon. 2014 Apr; 12(2):64-7.
Score: 0.039
-
Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2039-46.
Score: 0.038
-
The current capabilities of health information technology to support care transitions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1231.
Score: 0.038
-
Patient-centred healthcare, social media and the internet: the perfect storm? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar; 22(3):183-6.
Score: 0.036
-
Development of a web-based observational tool for detecting intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:1102.
Score: 0.036
-
Preoperative hyponatremia and perioperative complications. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22; 172(19):1474-81.
Score: 0.035
-
Policy initiatives for health information technology: a qualitative study of U.S. expectations and Canada's experience. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct; 81(10):713-22.
Score: 0.035
-
Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec; 19(6):980-7.
Score: 0.035
-
Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov; 20(11):959-65.
Score: 0.033
-
Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
Score: 0.032
-
Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug; 18(4):479-84.
Score: 0.032
-
Development of a tool within the electronic medical record to facilitate medication reconciliation after hospital discharge. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 01; 18(3):309-13.
Score: 0.032
-
The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28; 171(6):568-74.
Score: 0.032
-
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
Score: 0.031
-
Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec; 19(12):1211-5.
Score: 0.031
-
E-cigarettes: a rapidly growing Internet phenomenon. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 02; 153(9):607-9.
Score: 0.031
-
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
Score: 0.030
-
Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1475-84.
Score: 0.029
-
Commentary: nursing and health information technology. Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct; 56(5):237.
Score: 0.027
-
Health information exchange and patient safety. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec; 40(6 Suppl):S40-5.
Score: 0.025
-
Drug withdrawals in the United States: a systematic review of the evidence and analysis of trends. Curr Drug Saf. 2007 Sep; 2(3):177-85.
Score: 0.025
-
Preventing medication errors: a summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 15; 64(14 Suppl 9):S3-9; quiz S24-6.
Score: 0.025
-
Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
Score: 0.024
-
Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety. Yearb Med Inform. 2007; 22-9.
Score: 0.024
-
The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun; 15(3):174-8.
Score: 0.023
-
Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1180-9.
Score: 0.022
-
Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Aug; 38(4):259-61.
Score: 0.021
-
Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Apr; 31(4):203-10.
Score: 0.021
-
Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88.
Score: 0.021
-
Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb; 12(1):8-12.
Score: 0.020
-
The role of primary care non-physician clinic staff in e-mail communication with patients. Int J Med Inform. 2004 May; 73(4):333-40.
Score: 0.020
-
The National Alliance for Primary Care Informatics: development and current status. Inform Prim Care. 2004; 12(3):183-5.
Score: 0.019
-
Stimulant Drugs and Stimulant Use Disorder. Anesthesiol Clin. 2024 Mar; 42(1):103-115.
Score: 0.019
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003 Mar 05; 289(9):1107-16.
Score: 0.018
-
A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb; 10(1):1-10.
Score: 0.018
-
Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep; 11(3):261-5.
Score: 0.018
-
Testing of a Risk-Standardized Complication Rate Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM) for Total Hip and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:352-361.
Score: 0.017
-
Testing of a Risk-Standardized Major Bleeding and Venous Thromboembolism Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Elective Total Hip and/or Knee Arthroplasties. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2021:736-743.
Score: 0.017
-
Telehealth in US hospitals: State-level reimbursement policies no longer influence adoption rates. Int J Med Inform. 2021 09; 153:104540.
Score: 0.016
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.016
-
Costs of drug-related morbidity and mortality: enormous and growing rapidly. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 Mar-Apr; 41(2):156-7.
Score: 0.016
-
Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 02 01; 181(2):251-259.
Score: 0.016
-
Development and Alpha Testing of Specifications for a Prolonged Opioid Prescribing Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM). AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020; 2020:1022-1030.
Score: 0.016
-
The impact of the Internet on quality measurement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec; 19(6):104-14.
Score: 0.015
-
Prediction rules for complications in coronary bypass surgery: a comparison and methodological critique. Med Care. 2000 Aug; 38(8):820-35.
Score: 0.015
-
Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 02; 132(9):763-7.
Score: 0.015
-
The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part I. Information systems for medical transactions. MedGenMed. 2000 Feb 07; 2(1):E14.
Score: 0.015
-
Patient risk factors for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. ADE Prevention Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 22; 159(21):2553-60.
Score: 0.014
-
Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment. Am J Med. 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44.
Score: 0.014
-
Hospitalism in the USA. Lancet. 1999 Jun 05; 353(9168):1902.
Score: 0.014
-
Multinational comparison of new antidepressant use in older adults: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019 05 14; 9(5):e027663.
Score: 0.014
-
Sleep and Alertness in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019 03 07; 380(10):915-923.
Score: 0.014
-
Screening for adverse events. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb; 5(1):23-32.
Score: 0.014
-
Improving the use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 1998 Oct; 20(5):550-5.
Score: 0.013
-
Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era: Are We Ignoring the Real Cause? Ann Intern Med. 2018 07 03; 169(1):50-51.
Score: 0.013
-
Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):496-506.
Score: 0.013
-
Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
Score: 0.013
-
What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med. 1998 Apr; 104(4):361-8.
Score: 0.013
-
Education Outcomes in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19; 378(16):1494-1508.
Score: 0.013
-
Strategies for physician education in therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin Chem. 1998 Feb; 44(2):401-7.
Score: 0.013
-
High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
Score: 0.013
-
A Way Forward for Bipartisan Health Reform? Democrat and Republican State Legislator Priorities for the Goals of Health Policy. Am J Public Health. 2017 10; 107(10):1601-1603.
Score: 0.012
-
Outpatient CPOE orders discontinued due to 'erroneous entry': prospective survey of prescribers' explanations for errors. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 04; 27(4):293-298.
Score: 0.012
-
Commentary: quality, costs, privacy and electronic medical data. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):111-2, 82.
Score: 0.012
-
Prevalence of food allergies and intolerances documented in electronic health records. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1587-1591.e1.
Score: 0.012
-
Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):394-397.
Score: 0.012
-
Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
Score: 0.011
-
Ten key considerations for the successful optimization of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 01; 24(1):182-187.
Score: 0.011
-
Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun; 13(3):185-96.
Score: 0.011
-
The vulnerabilities of computerized physician order entry systems: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar; 23(2):311-6.
Score: 0.011
-
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
Score: 0.011
-
A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Computerised physician order entry-related medication errors: analysis of reported errors and vulnerability testing of current systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr; 24(4):264-71.
Score: 0.010
-
High Override Rate for Opioid Drug-allergy Interaction Alerts: Current Trends and Recommendations for Future. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:242-6.
Score: 0.010
-
Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 01; 20(10):e445-52.
Score: 0.010
-
Impact of sepsis on risk of postoperative arterial and venous thromboses: large prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Sep 08; 349:g5334.
Score: 0.010
-
Electronic problem list documentation of chronic kidney disease and quality of care. BMC Nephrol. 2014 May 04; 15:70.
Score: 0.010
-
A comparison of case definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan; 18 Suppl 1:S11-5.
Score: 0.010
-
Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994; 2(4):18-27.
Score: 0.010
-
Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Dec 27; 153(24):2759-65.
Score: 0.010
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
Score: 0.010
-
The impact of medical informatics on patient satisfaction: a USA-based literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar; 82(3):141-58.
Score: 0.009
-
National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
Score: 0.009
-
The meaningful use regulations in information technology: what do they mean for quality improvement in hospitals? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Jul; 37(7):333-6, 289.
Score: 0.008
-
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):666-71.
Score: 0.008
-
Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):693-6.
Score: 0.008
-
Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr; 18(2):187-94.
Score: 0.008
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 06; 362(18):1698-707.
Score: 0.007
-
Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
Score: 0.007
-
Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: enabling action. J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 5(1):9-15.
Score: 0.007
-
The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2008 Jun; 14(5):446-53.
Score: 0.007
-
Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 09; 167(13):1400-5.
Score: 0.006
-
Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19; 145(6):426-34.
Score: 0.006
-
E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):239-44.
Score: 0.006
-
Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05; 6:1.
Score: 0.006
-
Antibiotic treatment of children with sore throat. JAMA. 2005 Nov 09; 294(18):2315-22.
Score: 0.005
-
Functional gaps in attaining a national health information network. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1281-9.
Score: 0.005
-
The costs of a national health information network. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 02; 143(3):165-73.
Score: 0.005
-
Antivirals and antibiotics for influenza in the United States, 1995--2002. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug; 14(8):531-6.
Score: 0.005
-
Determinants of racial/ethnic differences in blood pressure management among hypertensive patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jun 22; 5(1):16.
Score: 0.005
-
The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun; Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18.
Score: 0.005
-
Determinants of JNC VI guideline adherence, intensity of drug therapy, and blood pressure control by race and ethnicity. Hypertension. 2004 Oct; 44(4):429-34.
Score: 0.005
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.005
-
Relationship of pulmonary artery catheter use to mortality and resource utilization in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec; 31(12):2734-41.
Score: 0.005
-
Severe sepsis: variation in resource and therapeutic modality use among academic centers. Crit Care. 2003 Jun; 7(3):R24-34.
Score: 0.005
-
Defining the priorities and challenges for the adoption of Information Technology in HealthCare: opinions from an expert panel. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 881.
Score: 0.004
-
Overcoming the barriers to the implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals: perspectives from senior management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 975.
Score: 0.004
-
A prospective evaluation of the CD14 and CD18 gene polymorphisms and risk of stroke. Stroke. 2002 Apr; 33(4):892-5.
Score: 0.004
-
A prospective evaluation of the heat shock protein 70 gene polymorphisms and the risk of stroke. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Apr; 87(4):622-5.
Score: 0.004
-
Costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction by provider type for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a critical review of the literature and proposed methodologic standards. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 01; 127(1):52-60.
Score: 0.003
-
The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 01; 125(1):8-18.
Score: 0.003