Connection

DAVID BATES to Medical Informatics

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Medical Informatics.
Connection Strength

8.221
  1. Call for better systems and data to support artificial intelligence for pandemic response. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 01; 29(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  2. Digital Health Equity as a Necessity in the 21st Century Cures Act Era. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16; 323(23):2381-2382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.632
  3. Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.565
  4. Evaluation: A Qualitative Pilot Study of Novel Information Technology Infrastructure to Communicate Genetic Variant Updates. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):461-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.478
  5. Care coordination gaps due to lack of interoperability in the United States: a qualitative study and literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 22; 16:143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  6. Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  7. A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e181-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.413
  8. The current capabilities of health information technology to support care transitions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.400
  9. Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.340
  10. Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research. PLoS Med. 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.300
  11. Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009 May; 99(5):950-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  12. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec; 77(12):848-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  13. Health information exchange and patient safety. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec; 40(6 Suppl):S40-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  14. Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety. Yearb Med Inform. 2007; 22-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  15. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb; 12(1):8-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  16. Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug; 73(7-8):607-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  17. Using information technology to improve surgical safety. Br J Surg. 2004 Aug; 91(8):939-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  18. The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23; 2:7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  19. Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  20. Late adopters of the electronic health record should move now. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):238-240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  21. Assessing the Effectiveness of Engaging Patients and Their Families in the Three-Step Fall Prevention Process Across Modalities of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Toolkit: An Implementation Science Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 01 21; 21(1):e10008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  22. Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020 03; 26(1):181-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  23. Accelerating Innovation in Health IT. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 01; 375(9):815-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  24. Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  25. Ten key considerations for the successful optimization of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 01; 24(1):182-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  26. Strategies for Managing Mobile Devices for Use by Hospitalized Inpatients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015; 2015:522-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  27. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e9-e13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  28. The impact of medical informatics on patient satisfaction: a USA-based literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar; 82(3):141-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  29. A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22; 183(5):E281-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  30. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  31. Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 02 01; 27(2):301-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  32. Systems engineering and human factors support of a system of novel EHR-integrated tools to prevent harm in the hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 06 01; 26(6):553-560.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  33. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  34. Off the hamster wheel? Qualitative evaluation of a payment-linked patient-centered medical home (PCMH) pilot. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep; 90(3):484-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  35. The rise and fall of England's National Programme for IT. J R Soc Med. 2011 Nov; 104(11):434-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.