DAVID BATES to Medical Informatics
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Medical Informatics.
Connection Strength
8.187
-
Call for better systems and data to support artificial intelligence for pandemic response. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 01; 29(1).
Score: 0.700
-
Digital Health Equity as a Necessity in the 21st Century Cures Act Era. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16; 323(23):2381-2382.
Score: 0.629
-
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
Score: 0.562
-
Evaluation: A Qualitative Pilot Study of Novel Information Technology Infrastructure to Communicate Genetic Variant Updates. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):461-76.
Score: 0.476
-
Care coordination gaps due to lack of interoperability in the United States: a qualitative study and literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 22; 16:143.
Score: 0.472
-
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
Score: 0.440
-
A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e181-4.
Score: 0.411
-
The current capabilities of health information technology to support care transitions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1231.
Score: 0.399
-
Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
Score: 0.339
-
Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research. PLoS Med. 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000105.
Score: 0.299
-
Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009 May; 99(5):950-5.
Score: 0.289
-
The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec; 77(12):848-54.
Score: 0.276
-
Health information exchange and patient safety. J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec; 40(6 Suppl):S40-5.
Score: 0.260
-
Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety. Yearb Med Inform. 2007; 22-9.
Score: 0.248
-
Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb; 12(1):8-12.
Score: 0.213
-
Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug; 73(7-8):607-14.
Score: 0.209
-
Using information technology to improve surgical safety. Br J Surg. 2004 Aug; 91(8):939-40.
Score: 0.209
-
The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23; 2:7.
Score: 0.185
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.170
-
Late adopters of the electronic health record should move now. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):238-240.
Score: 0.151
-
Assessing the Effectiveness of Engaging Patients and Their Families in the Three-Step Fall Prevention Process Across Modalities of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Toolkit: An Implementation Science Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 01 21; 21(1):e10008.
Score: 0.143
-
Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020 03; 26(1):181-189.
Score: 0.142
-
Accelerating Innovation in Health IT. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 01; 375(9):815-7.
Score: 0.121
-
Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
Score: 0.119
-
Ten key considerations for the successful optimization of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 01; 24(1):182-187.
Score: 0.118
-
Strategies for Managing Mobile Devices for Use by Hospitalized Inpatients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015; 2015:522-31.
Score: 0.114
-
Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e9-e13.
Score: 0.096
-
The impact of medical informatics on patient satisfaction: a USA-based literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar; 82(3):141-58.
Score: 0.094
-
A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22; 183(5):E281-8.
Score: 0.083
-
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
Score: 0.078
-
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 02 01; 27(2):301-307.
Score: 0.038
-
Systems engineering and human factors support of a system of novel EHR-integrated tools to prevent harm in the hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 06 01; 26(6):553-560.
Score: 0.037
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
Score: 0.025
-
Off the hamster wheel? Qualitative evaluation of a payment-linked patient-centered medical home (PCMH) pilot. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep; 90(3):484-515.
Score: 0.023
-
The rise and fall of England's National Programme for IT. J R Soc Med. 2011 Nov; 104(11):434-5.
Score: 0.022