DAVID BATES to Medical Records Systems, Computerized
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Medical Records Systems, Computerized.
Connection Strength
11.878
-
Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care. 2010 Mar; 48(3):203-9.
Score: 0.316
-
Physicians' use of key functions in electronic health records from 2005 to 2007: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug; 16(4):465-70.
Score: 0.298
-
Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009 May; 99(5):950-5.
Score: 0.296
-
Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb; 16(1):132-9.
Score: 0.288
-
A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov-Dec; 15(6):729-36.
Score: 0.285
-
Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7.
Score: 0.274
-
Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16(2):129-37.
Score: 0.272
-
Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct; 14(5):609-15.
Score: 0.263
-
An effort to improve electronic health record medication list accuracy between visits: patients' and physicians' response. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Mar; 77(3):153-60.
Score: 0.259
-
Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12; 167(5):507-12.
Score: 0.257
-
Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
Score: 0.254
-
Adverse drug event detection in a community hospital utilising computerised medication and laboratory data. Drug Saf. 2007; 30(9):817-24.
Score: 0.254
-
Do physicians take action on high risk family history information provided by patients outside of a clinic visit? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 1):13-7.
Score: 0.254
-
Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb; 14(1):110-7.
Score: 0.251
-
The electronic health record (EHR) in specialty care: a time-motion study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; 1014.
Score: 0.237
-
Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):693-700.
Score: 0.236
-
Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1180-9.
Score: 0.231
-
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(4):431-7.
Score: 0.225
-
How accurate is information that patients contribute to their Electronic Health Record? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 834-8.
Score: 0.221
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 961.
Score: 0.221
-
Impact of an Electronic Health Record on oncologists' clinic time. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1083.
Score: 0.221
-
Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1147.
Score: 0.221
-
Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88.
Score: 0.220
-
"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 08; 164(20):2223-8.
Score: 0.219
-
Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb; 12(1):8-12.
Score: 0.218
-
A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1166-70.
Score: 0.206
-
A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003 Apr 01; 114(5):397-403.
Score: 0.196
-
Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jul-Aug; 10(4):339-50.
Score: 0.196
-
Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr; 10(2):115-28.
Score: 0.195
-
Effective drug-allergy checking: methodological and operational issues. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr; 36(1-2):70-9.
Score: 0.193
-
A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb; 10(1):1-10.
Score: 0.192
-
Creating an enterprise-wide allergy repository at Partners HealthCare System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 376-80.
Score: 0.192
-
Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct; 27(10):509-21.
Score: 0.176
-
How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Sep; 155(9):1002-7.
Score: 0.175
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.174
-
Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001; 84(Pt 2):1207-11.
Score: 0.167
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 09; 160(18):2741-7.
Score: 0.165
-
A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses' time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 05 01; 27(5):798-807.
Score: 0.160
-
Asking residents about adverse events in a computer dialogue: how accurate are they? Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Apr; 24(4):197-202.
Score: 0.138
-
Towards improving the accuracy of the clinical database: allowing outpatients to review their computerized data. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998; 220-4.
Score: 0.136
-
Commentary: quality, costs, privacy and electronic medical data. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):111-2, 82.
Score: 0.131
-
The Big Phish: Cyberattacks Against U.S. Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1115-8.
Score: 0.125
-
Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):8-9.
Score: 0.107
-
A qualitative study identifying the cost categories associated with electronic health record implementation in the UK. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e226-31.
Score: 0.104
-
The rise and fall of England's National Programme for IT. J R Soc Med. 2011 Nov; 104(11):434-5.
Score: 0.089
-
Massachusetts e-Health Project increased physicians' ability to use registries, and signals progress toward better care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul; 30(7):1256-64.
Score: 0.087
-
The efficacy of computer-enabled discharge communication interventions: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May; 20(5):403-15.
Score: 0.084
-
Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25; 362(12):1066-9.
Score: 0.079
-
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):66-70.
Score: 0.078
-
Ability to generate patient registries among practices with and without electronic health records. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Aug 10; 11(3):e31.
Score: 0.076
-
The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug; 16(4):457-64.
Score: 0.074
-
Electronic health records and malpractice claims in office practice. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24; 168(21):2362-7.
Score: 0.072
-
Do electronic health records create more errors than they prevent? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1143.
Score: 0.072
-
Ability to perform registry functions among practices with and without electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1052.
Score: 0.072
-
Commentary: nursing and health information technology. Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct; 56(5):237.
Score: 0.071
-
Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb; 15(1):158-63.
Score: 0.071
-
Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12; 167(20):2233-9.
Score: 0.067
-
Do minority-serving physicians have comparable rates of use of electronic health records? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 993.
Score: 0.067
-
Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 09; 167(13):1400-5.
Score: 0.066
-
Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety. Yearb Med Inform. 2007; 22-9.
Score: 0.063
-
Adherence to black box warnings for prescription medications in outpatients. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13; 166(3):338-44.
Score: 0.060
-
Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05; 6:1.
Score: 0.059
-
Functional gaps in attaining a national health information network. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1281-9.
Score: 0.058
-
Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Aug; 62(8):903-10.
Score: 0.058
-
Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patient, physician, and practice setting characteristics. Am J Med. 2004 Dec 15; 117(12):919-24.
Score: 0.055
-
Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):482-91.
Score: 0.054
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.053
-
Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool. Int J Med Inform. 2003 Dec; 72(1-3):17-28.
Score: 0.051
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 23; 163(12):1409-16.
Score: 0.050
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.050
-
Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr; 36(1-2):80-91.
Score: 0.048
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 848.
Score: 0.048
-
Overcoming the barriers to the implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals: perspectives from senior management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 975.
Score: 0.048
-
Supporting patient care beyond the clinical encounter: three informatics innovations from partners health care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 1072.
Score: 0.048
-
End of visit: design considerations for an ambulatory order entry module. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002; 864-8.
Score: 0.045
-
Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug; 8(4):299-308.
Score: 0.043
-
Improving allergy alerting in a computerized physician order entry system. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 2-6.
Score: 0.039
-
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(4):313-21.
Score: 0.038
-
Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 05 14; 321(18):1780-1787.
Score: 0.037
-
Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 07; 1(3):e180530.
Score: 0.035
-
Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):496-506.
Score: 0.035
-
Clinical decision support: making the transition from the hospital to the community network. Healthc Inf Manage. 1997; 11(4):27-37.
Score: 0.032
-
Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Jan-Feb; 3(1):42-55.
Score: 0.030
-
How many medication orders are entered through free-text in EHRs?--a study on hypoglycemic agents. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012:1079-88.
Score: 0.024
-
Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr; 42(2):334-46.
Score: 0.018
-
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug; 15(4):424-9.
Score: 0.017
-
E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):239-44.
Score: 0.015
-
Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):5-11.
Score: 0.015
-
KnowledgeLink: impact of context-sensitive information retrieval on clinicians' information needs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):67-73.
Score: 0.015
-
Acute infections in primary care: accuracy of electronic diagnoses and electronic antibiotic prescribing. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):61-6.
Score: 0.015
-
The costs of a national health information network. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 02; 143(3):165-73.
Score: 0.014
-
Health care IT collaboration in Massachusetts: the experience of creating regional connectivity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec; 12(6):596-601.
Score: 0.014
-
Improving override rates for computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1110.
Score: 0.014
-
KnowledgeLink update: just-in-time context-sensitive information retrieval. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 902.
Score: 0.012
-
A clinical information systems strategy for a large integrated delivery network. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 438-42.
Score: 0.010
-
The Brigham integrated computing system (BICS): advanced clinical systems in an academic hospital environment. Int J Med Inform. 1999 Jun; 54(3):197-208.
Score: 0.009
-
Representing hospital events as complex conditionals. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; 137-41.
Score: 0.007