DAVID BATES to Medical Errors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Medical Errors.
Connection Strength
7.246
-
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2023 01 12; 388(2):142-153.
Score: 0.698
-
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
Score: 0.522
-
Disclosing medical errors: the view from the USA. Surgeon. 2014 Apr; 12(2):64-7.
Score: 0.375
-
The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct; 22(10):809-15.
Score: 0.366
-
Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1475-84.
Score: 0.276
-
The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun; 15(3):174-8.
Score: 0.221
-
The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug; 33(8):1694-700.
Score: 0.208
-
Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Nov 13; 387:e080480.
Score: 0.198
-
Improving patient safety across a large integrated health care delivery system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec; 15 Suppl 1:i31-40.
Score: 0.185
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.180
-
Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jul-Aug; 10(4):339-50.
Score: 0.177
-
Policy and the future of adverse event detection using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr; 10(2):226-8.
Score: 0.176
-
The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 04; 138(3):161-7.
Score: 0.175
-
Comparison of a Voluntary Safety Reporting System to a Global Trigger Tool for Identifying Adverse Events in an Oncology Population. J Patient Saf. 2022 09 01; 18(6):611-616.
Score: 0.169
-
What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA. 2002 Jul 24-31; 288(4):501-7.
Score: 0.168
-
Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 23; 9(1):77-88.
Score: 0.158
-
Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug; 8(4):299-308.
Score: 0.157
-
Error in medicine: what have we learned? Minn Med. 2000 Jul; 83(7):18-23.
Score: 0.146
-
Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 02; 132(9):763-7.
Score: 0.145
-
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
Score: 0.145
-
Design of a safety dashboard for patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 04; 103(4):741-747.
Score: 0.140
-
A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. 2019 10; 130:103938.
Score: 0.137
-
Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 05 14; 321(18):1780-1787.
Score: 0.135
-
Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 07; 1(3):e180530.
Score: 0.128
-
Adverse events and near misses relating to information management in a hospital. Health Inf Manag. 2016 Aug; 45(2):55-63.
Score: 0.109
-
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 11; 23(6):1068-1076.
Score: 0.109
-
How safe is primary care? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 07; 25(7):544-53.
Score: 0.107
-
Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi exercise. PLoS Med. 2013 Nov; 10(11):e1001554.
Score: 0.093
-
National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
Score: 0.087
-
Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):610-4.
Score: 0.081
-
Prevalence of adverse events in the hospitals of five Latin American countries: results of the 'Iberoamerican Study of Adverse Events' (IBEAS). BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec; 20(12):1043-51.
Score: 0.078
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.074
-
Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jun; 133(6):870-7.
Score: 0.073
-
Risks of complications by attending physicians after performing nighttime procedures. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14; 302(14):1565-72.
Score: 0.070
-
Do electronic health records create more errors than they prevent? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1143.
Score: 0.065
-
Commentary: nursing and health information technology. Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct; 56(5):237.
Score: 0.064
-
Mountains in the clouds: patient safety research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun; 17(3):156-7.
Score: 0.063
-
The costs and savings associated with prevention of adverse events by critical care nurses. J Crit Care. 2009 Sep; 24(3):471.e1-7.
Score: 0.063
-
Do medical inpatients who report poor service quality experience more adverse events and medical errors? Med Care. 2008 Feb; 46(2):224-8.
Score: 0.062
-
Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug; 15(4):289-95.
Score: 0.056
-
Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting. Cancer. 2005 Dec 01; 104(11):2477-83.
Score: 0.053
-
Patient-reported service quality on a medicine unit. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Apr; 18(2):95-101.
Score: 0.053
-
What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):830-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld PDA clinical reference applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1099.
Score: 0.050
-
Effect of reducing interns' work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 28; 351(18):1838-48.
Score: 0.049
-
Organization and representation of patient safety data: current status and issues around generalizability and scalability. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):468-78.
Score: 0.049
-
Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr; 10(2):115-28.
Score: 0.044
-
Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr; 36(1-2):80-91.
Score: 0.044
-
Evaluating the Impact of Radio Frequency Identification Retained Surgical Instruments Tracking on Patient Safety: Literature Review. J Patient Saf. 2021 08 01; 17(5):e462-e468.
Score: 0.039
-
Incorporating medication indications into the prescribing process. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 06 01; 75(11):774-783.
Score: 0.031
-
Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):710-717.
Score: 0.031
-
Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2063-8.
Score: 0.023
-
Tracing the foundations of a conceptual framework for a patient safety ontology. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec; 19(6):e56.
Score: 0.018
-
The relationship between perceived practice quality and quality improvement activities and physician practice dissatisfaction, professional isolation, and work-life stress. Med Care. 2009 Aug; 47(8):924-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: enabling action. J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 5(1):9-15.
Score: 0.017
-
Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):261-6.
Score: 0.014
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.012
-
Preventable medical injuries in older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 09; 160(18):2717-28.
Score: 0.009