DAVID BATES to United Kingdom
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about United Kingdom.
Connection Strength
0.862
-
Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):8-9.
Score: 0.105
-
Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov; 20(11):959-65.
Score: 0.087
-
Comparative risk of mortality in new users of prescription opioids for noncancer pain: results from the International Pharmacosurveillance Study. Pain. 2025 May 01; 166(5):1118-1127.
Score: 0.054
-
Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e-mail contact. Int J Med Inform. 2003 Apr; 70(1):1-9.
Score: 0.048
-
Opioid prescribing among new users for non-cancer pain in the USA, Canada, UK, and Taiwan: A population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021 11; 18(11):e1003829.
Score: 0.044
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.043
-
Multinational Investigation of Fracture Risk with Antidepressant Use by Class, Drug, and Indication. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 07; 68(7):1494-1503.
Score: 0.039
-
Medication errors and adverse drug events in a UK hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions: a prospective observational study. Lancet Digit Health. 2019 12; 1(8):e403-e412.
Score: 0.038
-
Multinational comparison of new antidepressant use in older adults: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019 05 14; 9(5):e027663.
Score: 0.037
-
Errors and discrepancies in the administration of intravenous infusions: a mixed methods multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 11; 27(11):892-901.
Score: 0.034
-
High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
Score: 0.034
-
Six ways for governments to get value from health IT. Lancet. 2016 May 21; 387(10033):2074-2075.
Score: 0.030
-
Pharmacosurveillance without borders: electronic health records in different countries can be used to address important methodological issues in estimating the risk of adverse events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 09; 77:101-111.
Score: 0.030
-
Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun; 13(3):185-96.
Score: 0.029
-
Qualitative analysis of vendor discussions on the procurement of Computerised Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support systems in hospitals. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26; 5(10):e008313.
Score: 0.029
-
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
Score: 0.028
-
Preparing British Military nurses to deliver nursing care on deployment. An Afghanistan study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan; 35(1):104-12.
Score: 0.026
-
A qualitative study identifying the cost categories associated with electronic health record implementation in the UK. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e226-31.
Score: 0.026
-
Evaluation of medium-term consequences of implementing commercial computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support prescribing systems in two 'early adopter' hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e194-202.
Score: 0.025
-
A comparison of case definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan; 18 Suppl 1:S11-5.
Score: 0.025
-
Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Dec 27; 153(24):2759-65.
Score: 0.025
-
Qualitative analysis of round-table discussions on the business case and procurement challenges for hospital electronic prescribing systems. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e79394.
Score: 0.025