DAVID BATES to Decision Support Systems, Clinical
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Decision Support Systems, Clinical.
Connection Strength
19.207
-
A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator. Drug Saf. 2024 Dec; 47(12):1235-1243.
Score: 0.785
-
Using the Electronic Health Record User Context in Clinical Decision Support Criteria. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 08; 13(4):910-915.
Score: 0.694
-
Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 06 12; 28(6):1081-1087.
Score: 0.635
-
Comparison of Medication Alerts from Two Commercial Applications in the USA. Drug Saf. 2021 06; 44(6):661-668.
Score: 0.622
-
Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2025889.
Score: 0.608
-
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 08 01; 27(8):1252-1258.
Score: 0.598
-
Reporting and Implementing Interventions Involving Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S137-S144.
Score: 0.591
-
Medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in inpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):476-481.
Score: 0.511
-
Improving medication-related clinical decision support. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 02 15; 75(4):239-246.
Score: 0.504
-
Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):718-724.
Score: 0.504
-
Evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2017 06; 39:156-161.
Score: 0.471
-
Methods for Detecting Malfunctions in Clinical Decision Support Systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:1385.
Score: 0.466
-
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int J Med Inform. 2017 01; 97:1-11.
Score: 0.458
-
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 11; 23(6):1068-1076.
Score: 0.442
-
Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701.
Score: 0.417
-
The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):630-9.
Score: 0.416
-
Understanding physicians' behavior toward alerts about nephrotoxic medications in outpatients: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Dec 15; 15:200.
Score: 0.405
-
Evaluation of a Korean version of a tool for assessing the incorporation of human factors into a medication-related decision support system: the I-MeDeSA. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(2):571-88.
Score: 0.391
-
Evaluation of medication alerts in electronic health records for compliance with human factors principles. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e332-40.
Score: 0.387
-
Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):487-91.
Score: 0.374
-
Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul; 39(7):312-8.
Score: 0.366
-
Overrides of clinical decision support alerts in primary care clinics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:923.
Score: 0.353
-
Understanding responses to a renal dosing decision support system in primary care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:931.
Score: 0.353
-
Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec; 19(6):980-7.
Score: 0.340
-
High-priority drug-drug interactions for use in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct; 19(5):735-43.
Score: 0.337
-
Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results. J Biomed Inform. 2012 Oct; 45(5):950-7.
Score: 0.336
-
Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):555-61.
Score: 0.330
-
Development and preliminary evidence for the validity of an instrument assessing implementation of human-factors principles in medication-related decision-support systems--I-MeDeSA. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec; 18 Suppl 1:i62-72.
Score: 0.323
-
Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug; 18(4):479-84.
Score: 0.315
-
Commentary: nursing and health information technology. Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct; 56(5):237.
Score: 0.262
-
Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr; 23(4):429-41.
Score: 0.254
-
Assessment of education and computerized decision support interventions for improving transfusion practice. Transfusion. 2007 Feb; 47(2):228-39.
Score: 0.235
-
Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Aug; 38(4):259-61.
Score: 0.211
-
A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar; 33(3):533-40.
Score: 0.205
-
Clinical Decision Support for Hypertension Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 01; 184(5):484-492.
Score: 0.194
-
Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec; 10(6):523-30.
Score: 0.184
-
Refining Clinical Phenotypes to Improve Clinical Decision Support and Reduce Alert Fatigue: A Feasibility Study. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 05; 14(3):528-537.
Score: 0.183
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 23; 163(12):1409-16.
Score: 0.183
-
Multicomponent intervention to improve blood pressure management in chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 12 22; 11(12):e054065.
Score: 0.165
-
How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Sep; 155(9):1002-7.
Score: 0.161
-
Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug; 8(4):299-308.
Score: 0.159
-
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
Score: 0.147
-
Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Drug Saf. 2019 04; 42(4):573-579.
Score: 0.136
-
The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 09 01; 25(9):1183-1188.
Score: 0.131
-
Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):496-506.
Score: 0.128
-
Evaluation of 'Definite' Anaphylaxis Drug Allergy Alert Overrides in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings. Drug Saf. 2018 03; 41(3):297-302.
Score: 0.126
-
Implementation of a scalable, web-based, automated clinical decision support risk-prediction tool for chronic kidney disease using C-CDA and application programming interfaces. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 01; 24(6):1111-1115.
Score: 0.124
-
Screening for medication errors using an outlier detection system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):281-287.
Score: 0.118
-
User Requirements for a Chronic Kidney Disease Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Referral. Int J Med Inform. 2017 05; 101:50-57.
Score: 0.117
-
Clinical decision support: making the transition from the hospital to the community network. Healthc Inf Manage. 1997; 11(4):27-37.
Score: 0.117
-
Development of an algorithm to assess appropriateness of overriding alerts for nonformulary medications in a computerized prescriber-order-entry system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Jan 01; 73(1):e34-45.
Score: 0.109
-
Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May; 25(5):315-9.
Score: 0.107
-
Qualitative analysis of vendor discussions on the procurement of Computerised Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support systems in hospitals. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26; 5(10):e008313.
Score: 0.107
-
Provider variation in responses to warnings: do the same providers run stop signs repeatedly? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e93-8.
Score: 0.107
-
The evolution of the market for commercial computerized physician order entry and computerized decision support systems for prescribing. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar; 23(2):349-55.
Score: 0.106
-
High Override Rate for Opioid Drug-allergy Interaction Alerts: Current Trends and Recommendations for Future. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:242-6.
Score: 0.101
-
Clinical decision support systems. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014; 144:w14073.
Score: 0.101
-
Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 01; 20(10):e445-52.
Score: 0.100
-
Evaluation of medium-term consequences of implementing commercial computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support prescribing systems in two 'early adopter' hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e194-202.
Score: 0.095
-
Using EHR data to predict hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a prospective study of a Bayesian Network model. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov; 82(11):1059-67.
Score: 0.092
-
Computerised decision support systems for healthcare professionals: an interpretative review. Inform Prim Care. 2012; 20(2):115-28.
Score: 0.082
-
Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce 'alert fatigue' while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec; 30(12):2310-7.
Score: 0.082
-
Opportunities and challenges in creating an international centralised knowledge base for clinical decision support systems in ePrescribing. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul; 20(7):625-30.
Score: 0.079
-
Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr; 18(2):187-94.
Score: 0.077
-
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
Score: 0.077
-
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
Score: 0.073
-
Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr; 42(2):334-46.
Score: 0.066
-
Adverse drug event detection in a community hospital utilising computerised medication and laboratory data. Drug Saf. 2007; 30(9):817-24.
Score: 0.058
-
Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):261-6.
Score: 0.055
-
Acute infections in primary care: accuracy of electronic diagnoses and electronic antibiotic prescribing. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):61-6.
Score: 0.054
-
Computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support in the long-term care setting: insights from the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct; 53(10):1780-9.
Score: 0.053
-
A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility trial results. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 11; 24(1):301.
Score: 0.050
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.046
-
Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep; 11(3):261-5.
Score: 0.043
-
Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation. Cancer Med. 2021 06; 10(12):4138-4149.
Score: 0.039
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 09; 160(18):2741-7.
Score: 0.038
-
Improving allergy alerting in a computerized physician order entry system. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 2-6.
Score: 0.036
-
Using information systems to improve practice. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Dec 11; 129(49):1913-9.
Score: 0.036
-
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(4):313-21.
Score: 0.035
-
Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21; 280(15):1311-6.
Score: 0.033
-
Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):575-584.
Score: 0.032
-
An informatics research agenda to support patient and family empowerment and engagement in care and recovery during and after hospitalization. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 02 01; 25(2):206-209.
Score: 0.031
-
High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
Score: 0.031
-
The frequency of inappropriate nonformulary medication alert overrides in the inpatient setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 09; 23(5):924-33.
Score: 0.028
-
A Single-Center Multidisciplinary Initiative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates: Quality and Financial Implications. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Jul-Sep; 34(3):218-24.
Score: 0.026
-
How many medication orders are entered through free-text in EHRs?--a study on hypoglycemic agents. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012:1079-88.
Score: 0.022
-
Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):482-91.
Score: 0.012
-
Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr; 36(1-2):80-91.
Score: 0.011