Connection

DAVID BATES to Data Collection

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Data Collection.
Connection Strength

2.208
  1. Evaluation of intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps in an academic medical center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1089-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  2. Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S130-S136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  3. Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Drug Saf. 2019 04; 42(4):573-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  4. Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  5. Increasing patient engagement: patients' responses to viewing problem lists online. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(4):930-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  6. Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec; 19(12):1211-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  7. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Sep; 19(9):961-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  8. Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  9. Measuring patient safety: the need for prospective detection of adverse events. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 148:3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  10. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. Do physicians take action on high risk family history information provided by patients outside of a clinic visit? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 1):13-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  12. Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec; 13(6):619-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):693-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  14. How accurate is information that patients contribute to their Electronic Health Record? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 834-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  16. Use and perceived benefits of handheld PDA clinical reference applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1099.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  17. Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  18. The role of primary care non-physician clinic staff in e-mail communication with patients. Int J Med Inform. 2004 May; 73(4):333-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  19. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17; 348(16):1556-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  20. Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  21. Physicians' perceptions toward electronic communication with patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 972.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  22. Real-time notification of laboratory data requested by users through alphanumeric pagers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun; 9(3):217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  23. Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun; 9(3):223-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  24. Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation. Cancer Med. 2021 06; 10(12):4138-4149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  25. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep; 15(9):626-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  26. Using electronic data to predict the probability of true bacteremia from positive blood cultures. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 893-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  27. User Requirements for a Chronic Kidney Disease Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Referral. Int J Med Inform. 2017 05; 101:50-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  28. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  29. Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):473-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  30. A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):666-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  31. Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan; 38(1):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  32. The cost of information technology-enabled diabetes management. Dis Manag. 2007 Jun; 10(3):115-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  33. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  34. Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. JAMA. 1997 Jul 16; 278(3):234-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  35. Representing hospital events as complex conditionals. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; 137-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.