Connection

DAVID BATES to Risk Management

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Risk Management.
Connection Strength

2.358
  1. Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  2. The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug; 33(8):1694-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  3. Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25; 162(21):2414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  4. E-pharmacy: improving patient care and managing risk. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 Sep-Oct; 42(5 Suppl 1):S20-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  5. Frequency, consequences and prevention of adverse drug events. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Mar; 19(1):13-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  6. Screening for adverse events. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb; 5(1):23-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  7. Asking residents about adverse events in a computer dialogue: how accurate are they? Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Apr; 24(4):197-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  8. Randomized Trial of Reducing Ambulatory Malpractice and Safety Risk: Results of the Massachusetts PROMISES Project. Med Care. 2017 08; 55(8):797-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  9. Evaluation of screening criteria for adverse events in medical patients. Med Care. 1995 May; 33(5):452-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  10. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Sep-Oct; 1(5):404-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  11. Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  12. Coded entry versus free-text and alert overrides: what you get depends on how you ask. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Nov; 79(11):792-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  13. Occurrence of adverse, often preventable, events in community hospitals involving nephrotoxic drugs or those excreted by the kidney. Kidney Int. 2009 Dec; 76(11):1192-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  14. Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: enabling action. J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 5(1):9-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  15. Adverse drug events and medication errors in psychiatry: methodological issues regarding identification and classification. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 9(1):24-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  16. Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun; 5(3):305-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct; 21(10):541-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  18. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 01; 119(5):370-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  20. Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug; 25(8):1289-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  21. Detecting alerts, notifying the physician, and offering action items: a comprehensive alerting system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996; 704-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  22. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):35-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.