DAVID BATES to Medication Errors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Medication Errors.
Connection Strength
26.829
-
Improving medication safety in both adults and children: what will it take? BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 09 19; 33(10):619-621.
Score: 0.765
-
Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety. Drug Saf. 2019 10; 42(10):1157-1165.
Score: 0.542
-
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 01; 29(1):52-59.
Score: 0.535
-
Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Drug Saf. 2019 04; 42(4):573-579.
Score: 0.524
-
The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 09 01; 25(9):1183-1188.
Score: 0.503
-
A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors. Drug Saf. 2018 06; 41(6):591-602.
Score: 0.494
-
Reduced Effectiveness of Interruptive Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts after Conversion to a Commercial Electronic Health Record. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 11; 33(11):1868-1876.
Score: 0.493
-
Determining Inappropriate Medication Alerts from "Inaccurate Warning" Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 04; 9(2):268-274.
Score: 0.491
-
Improving medication-related clinical decision support. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 02 15; 75(4):239-246.
Score: 0.484
-
Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):718-724.
Score: 0.484
-
National Rules for Drug-Drug Interactions: Are They Appropriate for Tertiary Hospitals? J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec; 31(12):1887-1896.
Score: 0.446
-
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int J Med Inform. 2017 01; 97:1-11.
Score: 0.440
-
Incidence of adverse drug events in public and private hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: the (ADESA) prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016 07 12; 6(7):e010831.
Score: 0.434
-
Evaluation of Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan; 124(1):25-34.
Score: 0.418
-
Development of an algorithm to assess appropriateness of overriding alerts for nonformulary medications in a computerized prescriber-order-entry system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Jan 01; 73(1):e34-45.
Score: 0.418
-
Evaluating the Impact of Health IT on Medication Safety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 222:195-205.
Score: 0.418
-
Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701.
Score: 0.401
-
The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):630-9.
Score: 0.400
-
Understanding the nature of medication errors in an ICU with a computerized physician order entry system. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114243.
Score: 0.389
-
Understanding physicians' behavior toward alerts about nephrotoxic medications in outpatients: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Dec 15; 15:200.
Score: 0.389
-
Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2014 Dec; 37(12):1011-20.
Score: 0.388
-
Medication errors: what is their impact? Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Aug; 89(8):1027-9.
Score: 0.379
-
The need for independent evaluations of government-led health information technology initiatives. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug; 23(8):611-3.
Score: 0.376
-
To err is human: lessons from patient safety research for transplant care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 May; 9(5):845-7.
Score: 0.372
-
Evaluation of use of electronic patient controlled analgesia pumps to improve patient safety in an academic medical center. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 201:153-9.
Score: 0.364
-
Evaluation of intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps in an academic medical center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1089-98.
Score: 0.361
-
Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e85-90.
Score: 0.347
-
Overrides of clinical decision support alerts in primary care clinics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:923.
Score: 0.340
-
Understanding responses to a renal dosing decision support system in primary care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:931.
Score: 0.340
-
Development of a web-based observational tool for detecting intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:1102.
Score: 0.340
-
Impact of vendor computerized physician order entry in community hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul; 27(7):801-7.
Score: 0.318
-
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
Score: 0.295
-
CPOE and clinical decision support in hospitals: getting the benefits: comment on "Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction". Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27; 170(17):1583-4.
Score: 0.290
-
Coded entry versus free-text and alert overrides: what you get depends on how you ask. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Nov; 79(11):792-6.
Score: 0.290
-
Medication errors recovered by emergency department pharmacists. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun; 55(6):513-21.
Score: 0.275
-
Occurrence of adverse, often preventable, events in community hospitals involving nephrotoxic drugs or those excreted by the kidney. Kidney Int. 2009 Dec; 76(11):1192-8.
Score: 0.270
-
Can surveillance systems identify and avert adverse drug events? A prospective evaluation of a commercial application. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct; 15(5):647-53.
Score: 0.248
-
Medication safety. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Mar; 35(1):37-52, viii.
Score: 0.243
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors in psychiatry: methodological issues regarding identification and classification. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 9(1):24-33.
Score: 0.240
-
Adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Sep-Oct; 7(5):383-9.
Score: 0.235
-
Preventing medication errors: a summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 15; 64(14 Suppl 9):S3-9; quiz S24-6.
Score: 0.233
-
Pediatric medication safety and the media: what does the public see? Pediatrics. 2006 Jun; 117(6):1907-14.
Score: 0.215
-
Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13; 166(5):565-71.
Score: 0.212
-
Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):837-41.
Score: 0.204
-
Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Aug; 38(4):259-61.
Score: 0.203
-
Allergy alerting and overrides for opioid analogues across two health systems. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 May 25; 32(1).
Score: 0.201
-
Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Apr; 31(4):203-10.
Score: 0.198
-
A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar; 33(3):533-40.
Score: 0.197
-
Strategies for detecting adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):492-8.
Score: 0.190
-
Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug; 73(7-8):607-14.
Score: 0.190
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug; 13(4):306-14.
Score: 0.190
-
Pediatric medication errors: what do we know? What gaps remain? Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Jan-Feb; 4(1):73-81.
Score: 0.182
-
Intravenous Medication Administration Safety with Smart Infusion Pumps in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan; 47(1):29-38.
Score: 0.180
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 23; 163(12):1409-16.
Score: 0.175
-
Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17; 348(16):1556-64.
Score: 0.173
-
Intelligent intravenous infusion pumps to improve medication administration safety. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 992.
Score: 0.170
-
Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25; 162(21):2414-20.
Score: 0.169
-
Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep; 11(3):261-5.
Score: 0.166
-
Unexpected hypoglycemia in a critically ill patient. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16; 137(2):110-6.
Score: 0.164
-
Development of a Perioperative Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Medication Errors: An Analysis of User Feedback. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 10; 12(5):984-995.
Score: 0.157
-
How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Sep; 155(9):1002-7.
Score: 0.155
-
A 40-year-old woman who noticed a medication error. JAMA. 2001 Jun 27; 285(24):3134-40.
Score: 0.153
-
Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 06 12; 28(6):1081-1087.
Score: 0.152
-
Preventable medication errors: identifying and eliminating serious drug interactions. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 Mar-Apr; 41(2):159-60.
Score: 0.150
-
Comparison of Medication Alerts from Two Commercial Applications in the USA. Drug Saf. 2021 06; 44(6):661-668.
Score: 0.149
-
Association of Display of Patient Photographs in the Electronic Health Record With Wrong-Patient Order Entry Errors. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2019652.
Score: 0.146
-
Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 09; 160(18):2741-7.
Score: 0.146
-
High-priority drug-drug interaction clinical decision support overrides in a newly implemented commercial computerized provider order-entry system: Override appropriateness and adverse drug events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 06 01; 27(6):893-900.
Score: 0.142
-
Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18; 320(7237):788-91.
Score: 0.140
-
Factors associated with workarounds in barcode-assisted medication administration in hospitals. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul; 29(13-14):2239-2250.
Score: 0.139
-
Identifying drug safety issues: from research to practice. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Feb; 12(1):69-76.
Score: 0.139
-
Medication errors and adverse drug events in a UK hospital during the optimisation of electronic prescriptions: a prospective observational study. Lancet Digit Health. 2019 12; 1(8):e403-e412.
Score: 0.136
-
Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999 Jul 21; 282(3):267-70.
Score: 0.134
-
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(4):313-21.
Score: 0.133
-
Frequency, consequences and prevention of adverse drug events. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Mar; 19(1):13-7.
Score: 0.130
-
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
Score: 0.127
-
Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21; 280(15):1311-6.
Score: 0.127
-
Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 05 01; 25(5):575-584.
Score: 0.123
-
Errors and discrepancies in the administration of intravenous infusions: a mixed methods multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 11; 27(11):892-901.
Score: 0.122
-
Association between workarounds and medication administration errors in bar-code-assisted medication administration in hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):385-392.
Score: 0.122
-
Evaluation of 'Definite' Anaphylaxis Drug Allergy Alert Overrides in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings. Drug Saf. 2018 03; 41(3):297-302.
Score: 0.121
-
High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
Score: 0.120
-
Comparison of Overridden Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in the Intensive Care Unit between a Commercial System and a Legacy System. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Aug 23; 8(3):866-879.
Score: 0.117
-
Outpatient CPOE orders discontinued due to 'erroneous entry': prospective survey of prescribers' explanations for errors. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 04; 27(4):293-298.
Score: 0.117
-
Analysis of variations in the display of drug names in computerized prescriber-order-entry systems. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Apr 01; 74(7):499-509.
Score: 0.114
-
A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):432-440.
Score: 0.113
-
Computerized prescriber order entry-related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):316-322.
Score: 0.113
-
Screening for medication errors using an outlier detection system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):281-287.
Score: 0.113
-
Evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support alert overrides in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2017 06; 39:156-161.
Score: 0.113
-
Medication errors. How common are they and what can be done to prevent them? Drug Saf. 1996 Nov; 15(5):303-10.
Score: 0.111
-
Prevention of Medication Errors in Hospitalized Patients: The Japan Adverse Drug Events Study. Drug Saf. 2016 11; 39(11):1129-1137.
Score: 0.111
-
Ambulatory Computerized Prescribing and Preventable Adverse Drug Events. J Patient Saf. 2016 06; 12(2):69-74.
Score: 0.108
-
Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 03; 6(3):e009777.
Score: 0.106
-
The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 02; 26(2):131-140.
Score: 0.106
-
The vulnerabilities of computerized physician order entry systems: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar; 23(2):311-6.
Score: 0.104
-
Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May; 25(5):315-9.
Score: 0.103
-
Provider variation in responses to warnings: do the same providers run stop signs repeatedly? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e93-8.
Score: 0.103
-
Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):29-34.
Score: 0.101
-
A safe practice standard for barcode technology. J Patient Saf. 2015 Jun; 11(2):89-99.
Score: 0.100
-
Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr; 10(4):199-205.
Score: 0.099
-
Computerised physician order entry-related medication errors: analysis of reported errors and vulnerability testing of current systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr; 24(4):264-71.
Score: 0.098
-
Clinical decision support systems. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014; 144:w14073.
Score: 0.097
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors in Japanese paediatric inpatients: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct; 23(10):830-7.
Score: 0.093
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
Score: 0.090
-
Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul; 39(7):312-8.
Score: 0.088
-
Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349.
Score: 0.083
-
Effect of a pharmacist intervention on clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 03; 157(1):1-10.
Score: 0.082
-
The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Mar; 38(3):120-6.
Score: 0.080
-
Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce 'alert fatigue' while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec; 30(12):2310-7.
Score: 0.079
-
Development and preliminary evidence for the validity of an instrument assessing implementation of human-factors principles in medication-related decision-support systems--I-MeDeSA. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec; 18 Suppl 1:i62-72.
Score: 0.078
-
Preventable adverse drug events and their causes and contributing factors: the analysis of register data. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr; 23(2):187-97.
Score: 0.074
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 06; 362(18):1698-707.
Score: 0.071
-
Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar; 3(2):212-9.
Score: 0.070
-
Adverse drug event rates in six community hospitals and the potential impact of computerized physician order entry for prevention. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan; 25(1):31-8.
Score: 0.068
-
The role of advice in medication administration errors in the pediatric ambulatory setting. J Patient Saf. 2009 Sep; 5(3):168-75.
Score: 0.067
-
What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians' prescribing behavior? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug; 16(4):531-8.
Score: 0.066
-
Risk factors in preventable adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients. J Pediatr. 2008 Feb; 152(2):225-31.
Score: 0.060
-
Medication safety messages for patients via the web portal: the MedCheck intervention. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Mar; 77(3):161-8.
Score: 0.058
-
Medication safety in a psychiatric hospital. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr; 29(2):156-62.
Score: 0.057
-
Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19; 145(6):426-34.
Score: 0.055
-
How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Feb; 32(2):73-80.
Score: 0.053
-
The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug; 33(8):1694-700.
Score: 0.051
-
Effect of bar-code technology on the incidence of medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events in a hospital pharmacy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1085.
Score: 0.049
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.044
-
Multifaceted approach to reducing preventable adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Mar 15; 60(6):582-6.
Score: 0.043
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003 Mar 05; 289(9):1107-16.
Score: 0.043
-
Effective drug-allergy checking: methodological and operational issues. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr; 36(1-2):70-9.
Score: 0.043
-
Creating an enterprise-wide allergy repository at Partners HealthCare System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 376-80.
Score: 0.042
-
Using information technology to screen for adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Dec 01; 59(23):2317-9.
Score: 0.042
-
Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct; 27(10):509-21.
Score: 0.039
-
Prevention of adverse drug events: a decade of progress in patient safety. J Clin Anesth. 2000 Dec; 12(8):600-14.
Score: 0.037
-
Comparison of a Prototype for Indications-Based Prescribing With 2 Commercial Prescribing Systems. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 03 01; 2(3):e191514.
Score: 0.033
-
Screening for adverse events. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb; 5(1):23-32.
Score: 0.032
-
Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug; 25(8):1289-97.
Score: 0.029
-
Digital Health and Patient Safety. JAMA. 2016 Apr 26; 315(16):1697-8.
Score: 0.027
-
Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 05; 274(1):35-43.
Score: 0.025
-
Task analysis of information technology-mediated medication management in outpatient care. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Sep; 80(3):415-24.
Score: 0.025
-
High Override Rate for Opioid Drug-allergy Interaction Alerts: Current Trends and Recommendations for Future. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:242-6.
Score: 0.024
-
Evaluation of medium-term consequences of implementing commercial computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support prescribing systems in two 'early adopter' hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e194-202.
Score: 0.023
-
How many medication orders are entered through free-text in EHRs?--a study on hypoglycemic agents. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012:1079-88.
Score: 0.021
-
Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):5-11.
Score: 0.013
-
Computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support in the long-term care setting: insights from the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct; 53(10):1780-9.
Score: 0.013
-
What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):830-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Improving override rates for computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1110.
Score: 0.012
-
Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec; 11(6):482-91.
Score: 0.012
-
Overcoming the barriers to the implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals: perspectives from senior management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 975.
Score: 0.011
-
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct; 21(10):541-8.
Score: 0.006
-
A new knowledge structure for drug-drug interactions. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 836-40.
Score: 0.006