DAVID BATES to Electronic Health Records
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Electronic Health Records.
Connection Strength
28.691
-
A genome-wide Association study of the Count of Codeine prescriptions. Sci Rep. 2024 10 01; 14(1):22780.
Score: 0.521
-
The Safety of Outpatient Health Care : Review of Electronic Health Records. Ann Intern Med. 2024 06; 177(6):738-748.
Score: 0.507
-
Virtual Scribes and Physician Time Spent on Electronic Health Records. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 05 01; 7(5):e2413140.
Score: 0.506
-
How Safe are Outpatient Electronic Health Records? An Evaluation of Medication-Related Decision Support using the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 10; 14(5):981-991.
Score: 0.493
-
The Electronic Inbox-Benefits, Questions, and Solutions for the Road Ahead. JAMA. 2023 11 14; 330(18):1735-1736.
Score: 0.490
-
System-Level Factors and Time Spent on Electronic Health Records by Primary Care Physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 11 01; 6(11):e2344713.
Score: 0.489
-
Electronic Health Record Transitions-How to Make Them Work. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 10; 38(Suppl 4):946-948.
Score: 0.486
-
A Multiyear Survey Evaluating Clinician Electronic Health Record Satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 08; 14(4):632-643.
Score: 0.482
-
Quality and Safety: Learning from the Past and (Re)Imagining the Future. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 12; 10(12):3141-3144.
Score: 0.459
-
Assessing hospital electronic health record vendor performance across publicly reported quality measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2101-2107.
Score: 0.422
-
Association of Hospital Public Quality Reporting With Electronic Health Record Medication Safety Performance. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 09 01; 4(9):e2125173.
Score: 0.421
-
Differences in Clinician Electronic Health Record Use Across Adult and Pediatric Primary Care Specialties. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 07 01; 4(7):e2116375.
Score: 0.416
-
Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 06 12; 28(6):1081-1087.
Score: 0.414
-
Differences in Total and After-hours Electronic Health Record Time Across Ambulatory Specialties. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 06 01; 181(6):863-865.
Score: 0.413
-
The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 01; 12(1):153-163.
Score: 0.406
-
Introduction: Improvement and Measurement in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S69-S72.
Score: 0.386
-
Getting Value From Electronic Health Records: Research Needed to Improve Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S130-S136.
Score: 0.386
-
High-priority drug-drug interaction clinical decision support overrides in a newly implemented commercial computerized provider order-entry system: Override appropriateness and adverse drug events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 06 01; 27(6):893-900.
Score: 0.386
-
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205547.
Score: 0.384
-
Technology-facilitated care coordination in rural areas: What is needed? Int J Med Inform. 2020 05; 137:104102.
Score: 0.378
-
Late adopters of the electronic health record should move now. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):238-240.
Score: 0.372
-
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 01; 29(1):52-59.
Score: 0.363
-
Potential of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient Portal for Improving Care Plan Concordance during Acute Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 05; 10(3):358-366.
Score: 0.360
-
Assessing EHR use during hospital morning rounds: A multi-faceted study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0212816.
Score: 0.353
-
Improving Electronic Health Record Usability and Safety Requires Transparency. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25; 320(24):2533-2534.
Score: 0.349
-
Closing the loop with an enhanced referral management system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 06 01; 25(6):715-721.
Score: 0.336
-
Reduced Effectiveness of Interruptive Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts after Conversion to a Commercial Electronic Health Record. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 11; 33(11):1868-1876.
Score: 0.335
-
Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 10; 8(4):1044-1053.
Score: 0.325
-
Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Get Value from Referrals. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 10; 8(4):1054-1056.
Score: 0.325
-
Using the Electronic Health Record to Understand and Minimize Overuse. JAMA. 2017 01 17; 317(3):257-258.
Score: 0.305
-
Methods for Detecting Malfunctions in Clinical Decision Support Systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:1385.
Score: 0.305
-
Awareness and Use of the After-Visit Summary Through a Patient Portal: Evaluation of Patient Characteristics and an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 13; 18(4):e77.
Score: 0.290
-
Drug allergies documented in electronic health records of a large healthcare system. Allergy. 2016 09; 71(9):1305-13.
Score: 0.289
-
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 11; 23(6):1068-1076.
Score: 0.289
-
Which Users Should Be the Focus of Mobile Personal Health Records? Analysis of User Characteristics Influencing Usage of a Tethered Mobile Personal Health Record. Telemed J E Health. 2016 05; 22(5):419-28.
Score: 0.280
-
Physician Perceptions and Beliefs about Generating and Providing a Clinical Summary of the Office Visit. Appl Clin Inform. 2015; 6(3):577-90.
Score: 0.278
-
Design of a cluster-randomized trial of electronic health record-based tools to address overweight and obesity in primary care. Clin Trials. 2015 Aug; 12(4):374-83.
Score: 0.269
-
Impact of incorporating pharmacy claims data into electronic medication reconciliation. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Feb 01; 72(3):212-7.
Score: 0.267
-
Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan; 22(1):213-22.
Score: 0.261
-
Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(3):789-801.
Score: 0.259
-
Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA. Lancet. 2014 Jul 05; 384(9937):8-9.
Score: 0.256
-
A patient-centered longitudinal care plan: vision versus reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1082-90.
Score: 0.256
-
Meaningful use and quality of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun; 174(6):997-8.
Score: 0.255
-
Evaluation of medication alerts in electronic health records for compliance with human factors principles. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e332-40.
Score: 0.253
-
A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e181-4.
Score: 0.253
-
Association of note quality and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May; 23(5):406-13.
Score: 0.246
-
Using electronic health records to address overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct; 45(4):494-500.
Score: 0.243
-
Documentation and diagnosis of overweight and obesity in electronic health records of adult primary care patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 23; 173(17):1648-52.
Score: 0.243
-
Using EHR data to predict hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a prospective study of a Bayesian Network model. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov; 82(11):1059-67.
Score: 0.240
-
Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16; 159(2):97-104.
Score: 0.240
-
High-priority drug-drug interactions for use in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct; 19(5):735-43.
Score: 0.220
-
Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results. J Biomed Inform. 2012 Oct; 45(5):950-7.
Score: 0.219
-
Use of an electronic problem list by primary care providers and specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug; 27(8):968-73.
Score: 0.218
-
Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):555-61.
Score: 0.215
-
A method and knowledge base for automated inference of patient problems from structured data in an electronic medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec; 18(6):859-67.
Score: 0.206
-
Development of a tool within the electronic medical record to facilitate medication reconciliation after hospital discharge. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 01; 18(3):309-13.
Score: 0.206
-
The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28; 171(6):568-74.
Score: 0.204
-
Leveraging electronic health records to support chronic disease management: the need for temporal data views. Inform Prim Care. 2011; 19(2):65-74.
Score: 0.201
-
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Feb; 20(2):192-202.
Score: 0.201
-
Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec; 19(12):1211-5.
Score: 0.200
-
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):91-6.
Score: 0.193
-
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr; 29(4):614-21.
Score: 0.191
-
Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25; 362(12):1066-9.
Score: 0.190
-
Changes in Clinician Time Expenditure and Visit Quantity With Adoption of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Scribes: A Multisite Study. JAMA. 2026 04 28; 335(16):1408-1417.
Score: 0.145
-
Testing and evaluation of generative large language models in electronic health record applications: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2026 Mar 01; 33(3):743-753.
Score: 0.144
-
Changes In Primary Care Physicians' Electronic Health Record Patterns After They Reduced Clinical Visit Volume. Health Aff (Millwood). 2026 Feb; 45(2):138-145.
Score: 0.143
-
Primary Care Physician Time Spent in Patient Care: An Observational Study Using Electronic Health Record Logs. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Dec; 178(12):1688-1697.
Score: 0.140
-
Development of an Algorithm for Estimating the Likelihood of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data. Am J Hematol. 2025 12; 100(12):2238-2247.
Score: 0.140
-
Performance and improvement strategies for adapting generative large language models for electronic health record applications: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2026 Jan; 205:106091.
Score: 0.139
-
Clinician Perceptions of Virtual Scribe Use: A Survey Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 04; 41(5):1229-1237.
Score: 0.138
-
Ambient Documentation Technology in Clinician Experience of Documentation Burden and Burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 01; 8(8):e2528056.
Score: 0.138
-
Frequency and preventability of adverse drug events in the outpatient setting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18; 34(8):499-506.
Score: 0.138
-
Clinician Attitudes and Perceptions of Point-of-Care Information Resources and Their Integration Into Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 26; 13:e60191.
Score: 0.136
-
Foundation model of electronic medical records for adaptive risk estimation. Gigascience. 2025 01 06; 14.
Score: 0.133
-
Enhancing early detection of cognitive decline in the elderly: a comparative study utilizing large language models in clinical notes. EBioMedicine. 2024 Nov; 109:105401.
Score: 0.131
-
Accurately identifying incident cases of venous thromboembolism in the electronic health record: Performance of a novel phenotyping algorithm. Thromb Res. 2024 11; 243:109143.
Score: 0.130
-
Factors Associated with Completeness of Sex and Gender Fields in Electronic Health Records. LGBT Health. 2025 Apr; 12(3):212-219.
Score: 0.129
-
Utilization of electronic health record sex and gender demographic fields: a metadata and mixed methods analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 04 03; 31(4):910-918.
Score: 0.126
-
Racism and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Perspectives for research and practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 04 19; 30(5):995-999.
Score: 0.118
-
Development and validation of algorithms to build an electronic health record based cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283775.
Score: 0.118
-
Learning from undercoded clinical records for automated International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 02 16; 30(3):438-446.
Score: 0.116
-
Dynamic reaction picklist for improving allergy reaction documentation: A usability study. Int J Med Inform. 2023 02; 170:104939.
Score: 0.115
-
Physician Note Composition Patterns and Time on the EHR Across Specialty Types: a National, Cross-sectional Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 04; 38(5):1119-1126.
Score: 0.115
-
Documentation dynamics: Note composition, burden, and physician efficiency. Health Serv Res. 2023 06; 58(3):674-685.
Score: 0.114
-
Electronic Health Record Legal Settlements in the US Since the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 11 04; 3(11):e223872.
Score: 0.114
-
Association Between Electronic Health Record Time and Quality of Care Metrics in Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 10 03; 5(10):e2237086.
Score: 0.113
-
Using the Electronic Health Record User Context in Clinical Decision Support Criteria. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 08; 13(4):910-915.
Score: 0.113
-
Usability of a perioperative medication-related clinical decision support software application: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 07 12; 29(8):1416-1424.
Score: 0.112
-
Assessment of Satisfaction With the Electronic Health Record Among Physicians in Physician-Owned vs Non-Physician-Owned Practices. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 04 01; 5(4):e228301.
Score: 0.110
-
Examination of Stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health Record. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144967.
Score: 0.108
-
PASCLex: A comprehensive post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) symptom lexicon derived from electronic health record clinical notes. J Biomed Inform. 2022 01; 125:103951.
Score: 0.107
-
User-centered design of a scalable, electronic health record-integrated remote symptom monitoring intervention for patients with asthma and providers in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 10 12; 28(11):2433-2444.
Score: 0.106
-
Embedding, aligning and reconstructing clinical notes to explore sepsis. BMC Res Notes. 2021 Apr 14; 14(1):136.
Score: 0.102
-
Comparison of Medication Alerts from Two Commercial Applications in the USA. Drug Saf. 2021 06; 44(6):661-668.
Score: 0.101
-
Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 02 01; 181(2):251-259.
Score: 0.101
-
Association of Display of Patient Photographs in the Electronic Health Record With Wrong-Patient Order Entry Errors. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2019652.
Score: 0.099
-
Characteristics of Patients Using Patient-Facing Application Programming Interface Technology at a US Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 10 01; 3(10):e2022408.
Score: 0.099
-
Genome-wide association analysis of opioid use disorder: A novel approach using clinical data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 12 01; 217:108276.
Score: 0.098
-
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 08 01; 27(8):1252-1258.
Score: 0.098
-
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 02 01; 27(2):301-307.
Score: 0.094
-
Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 01; 11(1):34-45.
Score: 0.094
-
Comparing Characteristics of Patients Who Connect Their iPhones to an Electronic Health Records System Versus Patients Who Connect Without Personal Devices: Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 08 22; 21(8):e14871.
Score: 0.091
-
Using Cognitive Load Theory to Improve Posthospitalization Follow-Up Visits. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 08; 10(4):610-614.
Score: 0.091
-
A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. 2019 10; 130:103938.
Score: 0.091
-
Systems engineering and human factors support of a system of novel EHR-integrated tools to prevent harm in the hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 06 01; 26(6):553-560.
Score: 0.090
-
Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 05 14; 321(18):1780-1787.
Score: 0.090
-
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 01; 7(1):103-111.
Score: 0.084
-
A value set for documenting adverse reactions in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 06 01; 25(6):661-669.
Score: 0.084
-
Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era: Are We Ignoring the Real Cause? Ann Intern Med. 2018 07 03; 169(1):50-51.
Score: 0.084
-
Improving Adoption of EHRs in Psychiatric Care. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 03; 378(18):1665-1667.
Score: 0.083
-
Physician and patient tools to improve chronic kidney disease care. Am J Manag Care. 2018 04 01; 24(4):e107-e114.
Score: 0.083
-
Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):718-724.
Score: 0.082
-
High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2018 03; 111:165-171.
Score: 0.082
-
Core Components for a Clinically Integrated mHealth App for Asthma Symptom Monitoring. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 10; 8(4):1031-1043.
Score: 0.081
-
Top ten challenges when interfacing a laboratory information system to an electronic health record: Experience at a large academic medical center. Int J Med Inform. 2017 10; 106:9-16.
Score: 0.079
-
Prevalence of food allergies and intolerances documented in electronic health records. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Dec; 140(6):1587-1591.e1.
Score: 0.078
-
Use of electronic healthcare records to identify complex patients with atrial fibrillation for targeted intervention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):339-344.
Score: 0.077
-
The Benefits and Challenges of an Interfaced Electronic Health Record and Laboratory Information System: Effects on Laboratory Processes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Mar; 141(3):410-417.
Score: 0.077
-
A Concept-Wide Association Study of Clinical Notes to Discover New Predictors of Kidney Failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 12 07; 11(12):2150-2158.
Score: 0.075
-
The Big Phish: Cyberattacks Against U.S. Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1115-8.
Score: 0.075
-
Significant Reduction in Preanalytical Errors for Nonphlebotomy Blood Draws After Implementation of a Novel Integrated Specimen Collection Module. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Oct; 146(4):456-61.
Score: 0.075
-
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int J Med Inform. 2017 01; 97:1-11.
Score: 0.075
-
Pharmacosurveillance without borders: electronic health records in different countries can be used to address important methodological issues in estimating the risk of adverse events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 09; 77:101-111.
Score: 0.073
-
Rising drug allergy alert overrides in electronic health records: an observational retrospective study of a decade of experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 05; 23(3):601-8.
Score: 0.070
-
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
Score: 0.069
-
Diabetes Screening Reminder for Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul; 126(1):109-14.
Score: 0.069
-
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
Score: 0.068
-
Increasing patient engagement: patients' responses to viewing problem lists online. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(4):930-42.
Score: 0.066
-
Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 01; 20(10):e445-52.
Score: 0.065
-
Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1123-31.
Score: 0.064
-
In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014 May 14; 311(18):1851-2.
Score: 0.063
-
Relationship between documentation method and quality of chronic disease visit notes. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(2):480-90.
Score: 0.063
-
Electronic problem list documentation of chronic kidney disease and quality of care. BMC Nephrol. 2014 May 04; 15:70.
Score: 0.063
-
Care partners and online patient portals. JAMA. 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):357-8.
Score: 0.062
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89.
Score: 0.061
-
The current capabilities of health information technology to support care transitions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:1231.
Score: 0.061
-
Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):487-91.
Score: 0.061
-
EHR adoption across China's tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional observational study. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Feb; 83(2):113-21.
Score: 0.060
-
Comparing electronic health record portals to obtain patient-entered family health history in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Dec; 28(12):1558-64.
Score: 0.059
-
Use of a web-based risk appraisal tool for assessing family history and lifestyle factors in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jun; 28(6):817-24.
Score: 0.058
-
National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May; 82(5):e149-60.
Score: 0.058
-
Active pharmacovigilance and healthcare utilization. Am J Manag Care. 2012 11 01; 18(11):e423-8.
Score: 0.057
-
Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):541-4.
Score: 0.054
-
Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):610-4.
Score: 0.054
-
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):666-71.
Score: 0.052
-
A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22; 183(5):E281-8.
Score: 0.051
-
Delayed Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Mortality Risk. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 02; 8(9):e2533928.
Score: 0.035
-
Typing Proficiency among Physicians in Internal Medicine: A Pilot Study of Speed and Performance. Appl Clin Inform. 2025 10; 16(5):1393-1400.
Score: 0.034
-
Allergy alerting and overrides for opioid analogues across two health systems. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 May 25; 32(1).
Score: 0.034
-
Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. Drug Saf. 2025 Apr; 48(4):363-374.
Score: 0.033
-
Evaluation of a Primary Care-Integrated Mobile Health Intervention to Monitor between-Visit Asthma Symptoms. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 08; 15(4):785-797.
Score: 0.033
-
Patient-Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 08; 15(4):733-742.
Score: 0.032
-
COVID-19 outbreaks surveillance through text mining applied to electronic health records. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 28; 24(1):359.
Score: 0.031
-
A deep learning approach for transgender and gender diverse patient identification in electronic health records. J Biomed Inform. 2023 11; 147:104507.
Score: 0.030
-
A multi-site randomized trial of a clinical decision support intervention to improve problem list completeness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 04 19; 30(5):899-906.
Score: 0.029
-
Post-Acute COVID-19 Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With Asthma: An Electronic Health Records-Based Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 03; 11(3):825-835.e3.
Score: 0.029
-
Heterogeneity of Drug Allergies and Reaction Lists in Two U.S. Health Care Systems' Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 05; 13(3):741-751.
Score: 0.028
-
Association between state-level malpractice environment and clinician electronic health record (EHR) time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1069-1077.
Score: 0.028
-
Multicomponent intervention to improve blood pressure management in chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 12 22; 11(12):e054065.
Score: 0.027
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.026
-
Identifying nursing documentation patterns associated with patient deterioration and recovery from deterioration in critical and acute care settings. Int J Med Inform. 2021 09; 153:104525.
Score: 0.026
-
Predicting pressure injury using nursing assessment phenotypes and machine learning methods. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 03 18; 28(4):759-765.
Score: 0.025
-
Assessing the cognitive and work load of an inpatient safety dashboard in the context of opioid management. Appl Ergon. 2020 May; 85:103047.
Score: 0.024
-
Challenges with Accuracy of Gender Fields in Identifying Transgender Patients in Electronic Health Records. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 12; 35(12):3724-3725.
Score: 0.023
-
The number needed to benefit: estimating the value of predictive analytics in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 12 01; 26(12):1655-1659.
Score: 0.023
-
Novel Approach to Inpatient Fall Risk Prediction and Its Cross-Site Validation Using Time-Variant Data. J Med Internet Res. 2019 02 19; 21(2):e11505.
Score: 0.022
-
Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era. Ann Intern Med. 2019 02 05; 170(3):216-217.
Score: 0.022
-
Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 02; 34(2):285-292.
Score: 0.021
-
Using whole genome scores to compare three clinical phenotyping methods in complex diseases. Sci Rep. 2018 07 27; 8(1):11360.
Score: 0.021
-
Implementation of a scalable, web-based, automated clinical decision support risk-prediction tool for chronic kidney disease using C-CDA and application programming interfaces. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 01; 24(6):1111-1115.
Score: 0.020
-
Increased Patient Satisfaction and a Reduction in Pre-Analytical Errors Following Implementation of an Electronic Specimen Collection Module in Outpatient Phlebotomy. Lab Med. 2017 Aug 01; 48(3):282-289.
Score: 0.020
-
Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):394-397.
Score: 0.019
-
A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Personalized Multi-Condition Risk Assessment in Primary Care. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan; 52(1):100-105.
Score: 0.019
-
Adverse events and near misses relating to information management in a hospital. Health Inf Manag. 2016 Aug; 45(2):55-63.
Score: 0.018
-
Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May; 25(5):315-9.
Score: 0.018
-
Evaluation of medium-term consequences of implementing commercial computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support prescribing systems in two 'early adopter' hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e194-202.
Score: 0.015