DAVID BATES to Attitude of Health Personnel
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Attitude of Health Personnel.
Connection Strength
5.547
-
The Electronic Inbox-Benefits, Questions, and Solutions for the Road Ahead. JAMA. 2023 11 14; 330(18):1735-1736.
Score: 0.611
-
Physician Perceptions and Beliefs about Generating and Providing a Clinical Summary of the Office Visit. Appl Clin Inform. 2015; 6(3):577-90.
Score: 0.347
-
Understanding physicians' behavior toward alerts about nephrotoxic medications in outpatients: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Dec 15; 15:200.
Score: 0.330
-
Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(3):789-801.
Score: 0.323
-
Disclosing medical errors: the view from the USA. Surgeon. 2014 Apr; 12(2):64-7.
Score: 0.310
-
Are we heeding the warning signs? Examining providers' overrides of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts in primary care. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e85071.
Score: 0.308
-
Discussion of "Attitude of physicians towards automatic alerting in computerized physician order entry systems". Methods Inf Med. 2013; 52(2):109-27.
Score: 0.288
-
Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr; 14(2):191-7.
Score: 0.190
-
A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(4):431-7.
Score: 0.168
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards ambulatory computerized physician order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 961.
Score: 0.165
-
Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Inform Prim Care. 2004; 12(3):129-38.
Score: 0.154
-
Association of Primary Care Physicians' Electronic Inbox Activity Patterns with Patients' Likelihood to Recommend the Physician. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jan; 39(1):150-152.
Score: 0.151
-
Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 848.
Score: 0.144
-
Physicians' perceptions toward electronic communication with patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 972.
Score: 0.144
-
Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment. Am J Med. 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44.
Score: 0.113
-
Primary Care Patients' and Providers' Perspectives about an Online Weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 08; 34(8):1503-1521.
Score: 0.112
-
Education Outcomes in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19; 378(16):1494-1508.
Score: 0.103
-
Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):710-717.
Score: 0.103
-
Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Jan-Feb; 3(1):42-55.
Score: 0.089
-
Provider variation in responses to warnings: do the same providers run stop signs repeatedly? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e93-8.
Score: 0.087
-
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):849-56.
Score: 0.084
-
Evaluating ambulatory practice safety: the PROMISES project administrators and practice staff surveys. Med Care. 2015 Feb; 53(2):141-52.
Score: 0.083
-
Clinicians' perspectives on patient satisfaction in adult congenital heart disease clinics--a dimension of health care quality whose time has come. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr; 10(2):128-36.
Score: 0.080
-
Lessons learned from implementation of computerized provider order entry in 5 community hospitals: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jun 24; 13:67.
Score: 0.074
-
An exploration of safety climate in nursing homes. J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep; 8(3):104-24.
Score: 0.070
-
Lessons from the Canadian national health information technology plan for the United States: opinions of key Canadian experts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 19(3):453-9.
Score: 0.065
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.061
-
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):66-70.
Score: 0.058
-
Ability to perform registry functions among practices with and without electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1052.
Score: 0.054
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec; 13(6):619-26.
Score: 0.046
-
Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05; 6:1.
Score: 0.044
-
Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct; 24(5):1180-9.
Score: 0.043
-
Use and perceived benefits of handheld PDA clinical reference applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; 1099.
Score: 0.041
-
Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88.
Score: 0.041
-
"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 08; 164(20):2223-8.
Score: 0.041
-
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug; 23(4):184-90.
Score: 0.040
-
A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1166-70.
Score: 0.039
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.037
-
Survey of primary care physicians and home care clinicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr; 17(4):253-61.
Score: 0.034
-
Utilizing health information technology in the treatment and management of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from international case study sites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 14; 28(7):1555-1563.
Score: 0.032
-
Using electronic data to predict the probability of true bacteremia from positive blood cultures. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 893-7.
Score: 0.029
-
Towards improving the accuracy of the clinical database: allowing outpatients to review their computerized data. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998; 220-4.
Score: 0.025
-
Top ten challenges when interfacing a laboratory information system to an electronic health record: Experience at a large academic medical center. Int J Med Inform. 2017 10; 106:9-16.
Score: 0.025
-
Exploring the roots of unintended safety threats associated with the introduction of hospital ePrescribing systems and candidate avoidance and/or mitigation strategies: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep; 26(9):722-733.
Score: 0.024
-
Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun; 13(3):185-96.
Score: 0.022
-
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct; 84(10):784-90.
Score: 0.021
-
A qualitative study identifying the cost categories associated with electronic health record implementation in the UK. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e226-31.
Score: 0.019
-
Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):473-80.
Score: 0.019
-
Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan; 38(1):19-26.
Score: 0.013
-
Do minority-serving physicians have comparable rates of use of electronic health records? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 993.
Score: 0.013
-
Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb; 13(1):5-11.
Score: 0.011
-
Improving completion of advance directives in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2004 Sep 01; 117(5):318-24.
Score: 0.010
-
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct; 21(10):541-8.
Score: 0.005