DAVID BATES to Massachusetts
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Massachusetts.
Connection Strength
3.467
-
The Safety of Outpatient Health Care : Review of Electronic Health Records. Ann Intern Med. 2024 06; 177(6):738-748.
Score: 0.227
-
Enhanced primary care and impact on quality of care in Massachusetts. Am J Manag Care. 2016 05 01; 22(5):e169-74.
Score: 0.130
-
Drug allergies documented in electronic health records of a large healthcare system. Allergy. 2016 09; 71(9):1305-13.
Score: 0.129
-
The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):630-9.
Score: 0.121
-
Design of a cluster-randomized trial of electronic health record-based tools to address overweight and obesity in primary care. Clin Trials. 2015 Aug; 12(4):374-83.
Score: 0.120
-
Documentation and diagnosis of overweight and obesity in electronic health records of adult primary care patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 23; 173(17):1648-52.
Score: 0.109
-
Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16; 159(2):97-104.
Score: 0.107
-
Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul; 39(7):312-8.
Score: 0.107
-
Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e85-90.
Score: 0.105
-
Use of a web-based risk appraisal tool for assessing family history and lifestyle factors in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jun; 28(6):817-24.
Score: 0.104
-
An educational intervention to improve cost-effective care among medicine housestaff: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2012 Jun; 87(6):719-28.
Score: 0.099
-
Impact of vendor computerized physician order entry in community hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul; 27(7):801-7.
Score: 0.097
-
Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):555-61.
Score: 0.096
-
Risk of thiazide-induced hyponatremia in patients with hypertension. Am J Med. 2011 Nov; 124(11):1064-72.
Score: 0.095
-
Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care. 2010 Mar; 48(3):203-9.
Score: 0.085
-
Physicians' use of key functions in electronic health records from 2005 to 2007: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug; 16(4):465-70.
Score: 0.080
-
Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009 May; 99(5):950-5.
Score: 0.079
-
Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb; 16(1):132-9.
Score: 0.077
-
Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7.
Score: 0.073
-
Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16(2):129-37.
Score: 0.073
-
Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12; 167(5):507-12.
Score: 0.069
-
Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb; 14(1):110-7.
Score: 0.067
-
Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):693-700.
Score: 0.063
-
Patterns of Social Needs Predict Quality-of-Life and Healthcare Utilization Outcomes in Patients from a Large Hospital System. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug; 39(11):2060-2068.
Score: 0.057
-
The Internet as a vehicle to communicate health information during a public health emergency: a survey analysis involving the anthrax scare of 2001. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Mar 03; 6(1):e8.
Score: 0.056
-
A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1166-70.
Score: 0.055
-
Survey of primary care physicians and home care clinicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr; 17(4):253-61.
Score: 0.049
-
Demographic Disparity in Use of Telemedicine for Ambulatory General Surgical Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Initial Public Health Emergency and Second Phase Periods. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Feb 01; 234(2):191-202.
Score: 0.048
-
Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct; 27(10):509-21.
Score: 0.047
-
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 01; 109(2):87-94.
Score: 0.044
-
Risk factors for hospitalization, intensive care, and mortality among patients with asthma and COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 10; 146(4):808-812.
Score: 0.044
-
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(4):313-21.
Score: 0.040
-
Physician and patient tools to improve chronic kidney disease care. Am J Manag Care. 2018 04 01; 24(4):e107-e114.
Score: 0.037
-
Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 24; 157(21):2501-8.
Score: 0.036
-
Randomized Trial of Reducing Ambulatory Malpractice and Safety Risk: Results of the Massachusetts PROMISES Project. Med Care. 2017 08; 55(8):797-805.
Score: 0.035
-
Clinical decision support: making the transition from the hospital to the community network. Healthc Inf Manage. 1997; 11(4):27-37.
Score: 0.034
-
Appropriateness of antiepileptic drug level monitoring. JAMA. 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1622-6.
Score: 0.031
-
Evaluating ambulatory practice safety: the PROMISES project administrators and practice staff surveys. Med Care. 2015 Feb; 53(2):141-52.
Score: 0.030
-
Clinical Workflow Observations to Identify Opportunities for Nurse, Physicians and Patients to Share a Patient-centered Plan of Care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2014:414-23.
Score: 0.029
-
Patient-centered medical home transformation with payment reform: patient experience outcomes. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(1):26-33.
Score: 0.028
-
Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2063-8.
Score: 0.027
-
Supratherapeutic dosing of acetaminophen among hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Dec 10; 172(22):1721-8.
Score: 0.026
-
Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349.
Score: 0.025
-
An exploration of safety climate in nursing homes. J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep; 8(3):104-24.
Score: 0.025
-
Off the hamster wheel? Qualitative evaluation of a payment-linked patient-centered medical home (PCMH) pilot. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep; 90(3):484-515.
Score: 0.025
-
Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):541-4.
Score: 0.024
-
Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; 19(4):610-4.
Score: 0.024
-
Massachusetts e-Health Project increased physicians' ability to use registries, and signals progress toward better care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul; 30(7):1256-64.
Score: 0.023
-
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):66-70.
Score: 0.021
-
Ability to generate patient registries among practices with and without electronic health records. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Aug 10; 11(3):e31.
Score: 0.020
-
The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug; 16(4):457-64.
Score: 0.020
-
Do electronic health records create more errors than they prevent? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1143.
Score: 0.019
-
Ability to perform registry functions among practices with and without electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1052.
Score: 0.019
-
Effectiveness of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1183.
Score: 0.019
-
Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb; 15(1):158-63.
Score: 0.019
-
Do minority-serving physicians have comparable rates of use of electronic health records? AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 993.
Score: 0.018
-
Empowering patients to improve the quality of their care: design and implementation of a shared health maintenance module in a US integrated healthcare delivery network. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 2):1002-6.
Score: 0.017
-
Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug; 15(4):289-95.
Score: 0.017
-
E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun; 13(3):239-44.
Score: 0.016
-
Health care IT collaboration in Massachusetts: the experience of creating regional connectivity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec; 12(6):596-601.
Score: 0.015
-
A clinical information systems strategy for a large integrated delivery network. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 438-42.
Score: 0.010
-
The Brigham integrated computing system (BICS): advanced clinical systems in an academic hospital environment. Int J Med Inform. 1999 Jun; 54(3):197-208.
Score: 0.010
-
Design and development of a computer-based clinical referral system for use within a physician hospital organization. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998; 52 Pt 1:98-102.
Score: 0.009