DAVID BATES to Safety Management
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID BATES has written about Safety Management.
Connection Strength
6.871
-
Understanding the Concept of Patient Safety Culture: Constitutive and Operational Definitions for Health Care Organizations. J Nurs Care Qual. 2025 Jan-Mar 01; 40(1):E8-E14.
Score: 0.874
-
Patient Safety As A Priority: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 04; 38(4):693.
Score: 0.597
-
Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep; 84(9):694-701.
Score: 0.457
-
Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9):402-10.
Score: 0.329
-
Costs of quality improvement: a survey of four acute care hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Nov; 35(11):544-50.
Score: 0.311
-
Measuring patient safety: the need for prospective detection of adverse events. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 148:3.
Score: 0.293
-
Mountains in the clouds: patient safety research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun; 17(3):156-7.
Score: 0.282
-
Preventing medication errors: a summary. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul 15; 64(14 Suppl 9):S3-9; quiz S24-6.
Score: 0.265
-
The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun; 15(3):174-8.
Score: 0.245
-
Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug; 73(7-8):607-14.
Score: 0.216
-
Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug; 13(4):306-14.
Score: 0.216
-
Improving patient safety across a large integrated health care delivery system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec; 15 Suppl 1:i31-40.
Score: 0.206
-
Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19; 348(25):2526-34.
Score: 0.200
-
Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep; 11(3):261-5.
Score: 0.189
-
Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct; 27(10):509-21.
Score: 0.177
-
How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Sep; 155(9):1002-7.
Score: 0.176
-
Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 10; 29(10):1-2.
Score: 0.160
-
Towards Analytics of the Patient and Family Perspective: A Case Study and Recommendations for Data Capture of Safety and Quality Concerns. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2017:615-624.
Score: 0.140
-
Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 09; 27(9):710-717.
Score: 0.138
-
Evaluating ambulatory practice safety: the PROMISES project administrators and practice staff surveys. Med Care. 2015 Feb; 53(2):141-52.
Score: 0.112
-
The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 2):365-8.
Score: 0.098
-
An exploration of safety climate in nursing homes. J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep; 8(3):104-24.
Score: 0.095
-
Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17; 154(10):693-6.
Score: 0.086
-
Tracing the foundations of a conceptual framework for a patient safety ontology. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec; 19(6):e56.
Score: 0.082
-
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):91-6.
Score: 0.081
-
Patient safety research: an overview of the global evidence. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb; 19(1):42-7.
Score: 0.079
-
Measures of patient safety in developing and emerging countries: a review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb; 19(1):48-54.
Score: 0.079
-
Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1475-84.
Score: 0.077
-
Global priorities for patient safety research. BMJ. 2009 May 14; 338:b1775.
Score: 0.075
-
Adverse drug event detection in a community hospital utilising computerised medication and laboratory data. Drug Saf. 2007; 30(9):817-24.
Score: 0.064
-
Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug; 15(4):289-95.
Score: 0.062
-
How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Feb; 32(2):73-80.
Score: 0.060
-
Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Apr; 31(4):203-10.
Score: 0.057
-
Multifaceted approach to reducing preventable adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Mar 15; 60(6):582-6.
Score: 0.049
-
Impact of Teamwork and Communication Training Interventions on Safety Culture and Patient Safety in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review. J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 01; 18(1):e351-e361.
Score: 0.045
-
Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May; 25(5):315-9.
Score: 0.029
-
A multidisciplinary three-phase approach to improve the clinical utility of patient safety indicators. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Apr-Jun; 24(2):62-8.
Score: 0.028
-
Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349.
Score: 0.024
-
Opportunities and challenges in creating an international centralised knowledge base for clinical decision support systems in ePrescribing. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul; 20(7):625-30.
Score: 0.022
-
The role of advice in medication administration errors in the pediatric ambulatory setting. J Patient Saf. 2009 Sep; 5(3):168-75.
Score: 0.019
-
Evaluation of the contributions of an electronic web-based reporting system: enabling action. J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar; 5(1):9-15.
Score: 0.019
-
Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan; 38(1):19-26.
Score: 0.017
-
Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19; 145(6):426-34.
Score: 0.016
-
Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05; 6:1.
Score: 0.015
-
Prevention of adverse drug events: a decade of progress in patient safety. J Clin Anesth. 2000 Dec; 12(8):600-14.
Score: 0.010