TRABER GIARDINA to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications TRABER GIARDINA has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.352
-
Partnership as a Pathway to Diagnostic Excellence: The Challenges and Successes of Implementing the Safer Dx Learning Lab. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 12; 50(12):834-841.
Score: 0.026
-
Advancing Diagnostic Equity Through Clinician Engagement, Community Partnerships, and Connected Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 04; 38(5):1293-1295.
Score: 0.023
-
Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care Organizations. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(15):3965-3972.
Score: 0.023
-
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1091-1100.
Score: 0.022
-
Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. J Patient Saf. 2022 12 01; 18(8):770-778.
Score: 0.022
-
Use of patient complaints to identify diagnosis-related safety concerns: a mixed-method evaluation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):996-1001.
Score: 0.021
-
Health Care Provider Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Harm. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 05; 46(5):282-290.
Score: 0.019
-
Learning From Patients' Experiences Related To Diagnostic Errors Is Essential For Progress In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1821-1827.
Score: 0.018
-
Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
Score: 0.017
-
Social Workers' Perceived Barriers to and Sources of Support for Integrating Clients' Religion and Spirituality in Practice. Soc Work. 2017 10 01; 62(4):323-332.
Score: 0.016
-
Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other. Healthc (Amst). 2017 Sep; 5(3):81-85.
Score: 0.015
-
Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun; 98(6):788-96.
Score: 0.014
-
Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
Score: 0.012
-
A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2440269.
Score: 0.007
-
Diagnostic error in mental health: a review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19; 33(10):663-672.
Score: 0.007
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
Score: 0.007
-
Patient generated research priorities to improve diagnostic safety: A systematic prioritization exercise. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 05; 110:107650.
Score: 0.006
-
Technology-Based Closed-Loop Tracking for Improving Communication and Follow-up of Pathology Results. J Patient Saf. 2022 01 01; 18(1):e262-e266.
Score: 0.005
-
An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):570-575.
Score: 0.005
-
Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: Current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 11; 104(11):2606-2615.
Score: 0.005
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
Score: 0.005
-
Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 26; 8(3):340-346.
Score: 0.005
-
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 01 30; 22(1):e14679.
Score: 0.005
-
Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
Score: 0.005
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.005
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
Score: 0.005
-
Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record-enabled primary care. Health Informatics J. 2019 12; 25(4):1549-1562.
Score: 0.004
-
Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 01; 30(1):2-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
Score: 0.004
-
Emergency physicians' views of direct notification of laboratory and radiology results to patients using the Internet: a multisite survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 04; 17(3):e60.
Score: 0.003
-
Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
Score: 0.003
-
Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
Score: 0.003
-
Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
Score: 0.003
-
Rethinking resident supervision to improve safety: from hierarchical to interprofessional models. J Hosp Med. 2011 Oct; 6(8):445-52.
Score: 0.003
-
Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
Score: 0.003