Header Logo

Connection

MUSTAPHA DEBBOUN to Insect Repellents

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications MUSTAPHA DEBBOUN has written about Insect Repellents.
MUSTAPHA DEBBOUN
Connection Strength
6.945
Insect Repellents
  1. Evaluation of a Novel User-Friendly Arthropod Repellent Gel, Verdegen. J Med Entomol. 2021 11 09; 58(6):2479-2483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.713
  2. Laboratory and semi-field evaluations of two (transfluthrin) spatial repellent devices against Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). US Army Med Dep J. 2017 Jan-Jun; (1-17):13-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.509
  3. Fatigue from multiple host-seeking activity of Aedes albopictus and its effects on bloodfeeding behavior and deet repellency. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2014 Jun; 30(2):116-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  4. Insect repellents and associated personal protection for a reduction in human disease. Med Vet Entomol. 2013 Mar; 27(1):1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.370
  5. Field evaluation of the Off! Clip-on Mosquito Repellent (metofluthrin) against Aedes albopictus and Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern Florida. J Med Entomol. 2012 May; 49(3):652-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  6. Expert review of the evidence base for arthropod bite avoidance. J Travel Med. 2010 May-Jun; 17(3):182-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  7. Laboratory and field evaluation of SS220 and deet against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Jun; 25(2):174-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  8. Isolongifolenone: a novel sesquiterpene repellent of ticks and mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 2009 Jan; 46(1):100-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.292
  9. Chemical defense against blood-feeding arthropods by disruption of biting behavior. US Army Med Dep J. 2008 Apr-Jun; 4-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  10. Biting deterrent activity of a deet analog, two DEPA analogs, and SS220 applied topically to human volunteers compared with deet against three species of blood-feeding flies. J Med Entomol. 2006 Nov; 43(6):1248-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  11. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi. J Med Entomol. 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  12. Repellents and the military: our first line of defense. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Dec; 21(4 Suppl):4-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  13. Field-user acceptability of new camouflage face paint formulations in the Republic of Korea. Mil Med. 2005 Oct; 170(10):831-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  14. Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks. Med Vet Entomol. 2005 Mar; 19(1):101-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  15. A new in vitro bioassay system for discovery of novel human-use mosquito repellents. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Mar; 21(1):64-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  16. In vitro repellency of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide and N,N-diethylphenylacetamide analogs against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2004 May; 41(3):430-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  17. Comparative activity of deet and AI3-37220 repellents against the ticks Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) in laboratory bioassays. J Med Entomol. 2004 Mar; 41(2):249-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  18. Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog: comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi. J Med Entomol. 2003 May; 40(3):293-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  19. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia. J Med Entomol. 2002 May; 39(3):541-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  20. Stereochemical effects in an insect repellent. J Med Entomol. 2001 Nov; 38(6):809-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  21. Field evaluation of deet and a piperidine repellent against Aedes communis (Diptera: Culicidae) and Simulium venustum (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. J Med Entomol. 2000 Nov; 37(6):919-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  22. Characterisation of actions of p-menthane-3,8-diol repellent formulations against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020 09 01; 114(9):687-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  23. A new module for quantitative evaluation of repellent efficacy using human subjects. J Med Entomol. 2000 Jan; 37(1):177-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  24. Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999 Sep; 15(3):342-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  25. Four simple stimuli that induce host-seeking and blood-feeding behaviors in two mosquito species, with a clue to DEET's mode of action. J Vector Ecol. 2013 Jun; 38(1):143-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  26. Twelve-hour duration testing of cream formulations of three repellents against Amblyomma americanum. Med Vet Entomol. 2008 Jun; 22(2):144-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  27. Feeding deterrent effects of catnip oil components compared with two synthetic amides against Aedes aegypti. J Med Entomol. 2005 Jul; 42(4):643-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  28. Development of an in vitro method for the evaluation of candidate repellents against Leptotrombidium (Acari: Trombiculidae) chiggers. J Med Entomol. 2003 Jan; 40(1):64-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  29. The effect of sunscreen on the efficacy of insect repellent: a clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Aug; 43(2 Pt 1):219-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  30. Laboratory and field trials of four repellents with Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1994 Jan; 31(1):17-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.