Header Logo

Connection

HOP S. TRAN CAO to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HOP S. TRAN CAO has written about Treatment Outcome.
HOP S. TRAN CAO
Connection Strength
0.746
Treatment Outcome
  1. A propensity score matched cost analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2024 Nov; 26(11):1379-1386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  2. Evaluating the benefit of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with multifocality or intrahepatic vascular invasion. HPB (Oxford). 2023 07; 25(7):758-765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma - does pathologic response mean better outcomes? HPB (Oxford). 2023 04; 25(4):472-480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  4. Lymphadenectomy and margin-negative resection for biliary tract cancer surgery in the United States-Differential technical performance by approach. J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep; 126(4):658-666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  5. Outcomes of Mixed Pathologic Response in Patients with Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Liver Resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug; 29(8):5156-5164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  6. Nodal downstaging as a treatment goal for node-positive pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2019 06; 165(6):1144-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  7. The role of surgery and adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive cancers of the gallbladder and intrahepatic bile ducts. Cancer. 2018 Jan 01; 124(1):74-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  8. Value of lymph node positivity in treatment planning for early stage pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2017 09; 162(3):557-567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  9. Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar; 149(3):237-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  10. Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center. Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct; 23(10):2364-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  11. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy vs single-stage major hepatectomy for bilateral colorectal liver metastases: a higher rate of microscopically positive margins is not associated with increased local recurrence after parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul; 29(7):102070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  12. Tissue and Imaging Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncology. 2025; 103(6):490-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  13. Impact of cumulative operative time on postoperative complication risk in simultaneous resections of colorectal liver metastases and primary tumors. HPB (Oxford). 2023 03; 25(3):347-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  14. Fast-track two-stage hepatectomy by concurrent portal vein embolization at first-stage hepatectomy in hybrid interventional radiology / operating suite. Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec; 39:101648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  15. Genomic Sequencing and Insight into Clinical Heterogeneity and Prognostic Pathway Genes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal?Cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 08; 233(2):272-284.e13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  16. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of a Transdiaphragmatic Approach for Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Liver and Lung Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 03; 25(3):641-649.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  17. Long-Term Assessment of Pancreatic Function After Pancreatectomy for Cystic Neoplasms. J Surg Res. 2020 03; 247:547-555.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  18. Prognostic Value of Nodal Response After Preoperative Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 02; 17(2):161-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Impact of the Treating Hospital on Care Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018 11; 68(5):1879-1889.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Hospital Minimally Invasive Surgery Utilization for Gastrointestinal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):303-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  21. Limitations of the National Cancer Data Base to Evaluate Early-Stage Anal Cancer Treatment Outcomes-Reply. JAMA Surg. 2018 07 01; 153(7):691-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. Sequential drain amylase to guide drain removal following pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018 06; 20(6):514-520.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  23. Prognostic value of neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2018 06; 226:15-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  24. Evidence-Based Management of Drains Following Pancreatic Resection: A Systematic Review. Pancreas. 2018 01; 47(1):12-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  25. Endocrine incidentalomas. Curr Probl Surg. 2016 May; 53(5):219-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  26. Therapeutic advances in pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun; 144(6):1316-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. The battle of the sexes: women win out in gastrointestinal surgery. J Surg Res. 2011 Sep; 170(1):e23-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.