HODA BADR to Male
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HODA BADR has written about Male.
Connection Strength
1.004
-
Stress, Employment Changes, and Psychological Distress Among Caregivers of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 151(6):541-548.
Score: 0.038
-
Unmet supportive care needs in patients with advanced cancer and its impact on distress. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 21; 24(1):110.
Score: 0.038
-
Multilevel barriers and supportive care preferences of metastatic breast cancer patients and their caregivers: a mixed-methods analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 11; 33(3):177.
Score: 0.037
-
Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study. Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 04; 59(1).
Score: 0.037
-
Development and validation of FinTox: A new screening tool to assess cancer-related financial toxicity. Cancer Med. 2024 Aug; 13(15):e7306.
Score: 0.036
-
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of Three Outreach Events to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Communities in Houston, Texas, 2022. Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug; 139(1_suppl):71S-80S.
Score: 0.034
-
Social Connectedness and Perceived Stress Among Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Mixed-Methods Study. Int J Behav Med. 2024 Jun; 31(3):380-392.
Score: 0.034
-
Gender Differences in Coping and Psychological Adaptation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 01 05; 20(2).
Score: 0.032
-
Predictors of COVID-19 perceived susceptibility: insights from population-based self-reported survey during lockdown in the United States. J Infect Public Health. 2022 May; 15(5):508-514.
Score: 0.031
-
Sociodemographic and Health Belief Model Factors Associated with Nonadherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies in the United States. Ann Behav Med. 2021 06 28; 55(7):677-685.
Score: 0.029
-
Individual-Level Determinants of Lifestyle Behavioral Changes during COVID-19 Lockdown in the United States: Results of an Online Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 04 20; 18(8).
Score: 0.029
-
Psychosocial and health behavioural impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on adults in the USA: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020 12 22; 10(12):e044642.
Score: 0.028
-
Lifestyle behaviors and intervention preferences of early-stage lung cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Mar; 29(3):1465-1475.
Score: 0.027
-
Emotional disclosure and cognitive processing in couples coping with head and neck cancer. J Behav Med. 2020 06; 43(3):411-425.
Score: 0.025
-
Associations between pre-, post-, and peri-operative variables and health resource use following surgery for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019 03; 90:102-108.
Score: 0.025
-
Self-management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer. 2019 04 01; 125(7):1176-1184.
Score: 0.024
-
Survivorship Challenges and Information Needs after Radiotherapy for Oral Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2017 Dec; 32(4):799-807.
Score: 0.023
-
New frontiers in couple-based interventions in cancer care: refining the prescription for spousal communication. Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb; 56(2):139-145.
Score: 0.021
-
Natural language use and couples' adjustment to head and neck cancer. Health Psychol. 2016 Oct; 35(10):1069-80.
Score: 0.021
-
Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016 Jul-Aug; 34(4):336-46.
Score: 0.021
-
Depression in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their informal caregivers. Aging Ment Health. 2017 09; 21(9):975-982.
Score: 0.020
-
The importance of actively involving partners in oncofertility discussions. Future Oncol. 2016 Jul; 12(14):1679-82.
Score: 0.020
-
Development and usability testing of a web-based self-management intervention for oral cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep; 25(5):806-21.
Score: 0.020
-
An observational study of social control, mood, and self-efficacy in couples during treatment for head and neck cancer. Psychol Health. 2015; 30(7):783-802.
Score: 0.019
-
Pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and dyadic adjustment influence patient and partner depression in metastatic breast cancer. Clin J Pain. 2014 Nov; 30(11):923-33.
Score: 0.018
-
Psychological distress in patients and caregivers over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014 Oct; 50(10):1005-11.
Score: 0.018
-
An exploratory study of the informational and psychosocial needs of patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2013 Nov; 49(11):1067-71.
Score: 0.017
-
Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec; 7(4):523-34.
Score: 0.017
-
An electronic diary study of the effects of patient avoidance and partner social constraints on patient momentary affect in metastatic breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr; 45(2):192-202.
Score: 0.016
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Aug; 22(8):1688-704.
Score: 0.016
-
Health behaviors and weight status of childhood cancer survivors and their parents: similarities and opportunities for joint interventions. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Dec; 111(12):1917-23.
Score: 0.015
-
Associations between depression, pain behaviors, and partner responses to pain in metastatic breast cancer. Pain. 2011 Nov; 152(11):2596-2604.
Score: 0.015
-
Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology. 2010 Sep; 19(9):941-54.
Score: 0.014
-
Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010 Mar; 29(2):169-80.
Score: 0.013
-
Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009 Jul; 18(7):735-46.
Score: 0.013
-
Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychol. 2008 Sep; 27(5):616-27.
Score: 0.012
-
Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer. 2008 Jun 01; 112(11 Suppl):2541-55.
Score: 0.012
-
Attachment insecurity and perceptions of housework: Associations with marital well-being. J Fam Psychol. 2008 Apr; 22(2):313-9.
Score: 0.012
-
Does talking about their relationship affect couples' marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? J Cancer Surviv. 2008 Mar; 2(1):53-64.
Score: 0.012
-
Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer. Psychooncology. 2006 Aug; 15(8):673-83.
Score: 0.010
-
Dyadic adjustment in chronic illness: does relationship talk matter? J Fam Psychol. 2005 Sep; 19(3):465-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Genome-wide association study for lung cancer in 6531 African Americans reveals new susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2025 Jul 03; 34(14):1227-1237.
Score: 0.010
-
Health locus of control beliefs and smoking among male Kuwaiti government employees. East Mediterr Health J. 2005 Jan-Mar; 11(1-2):137-45.
Score: 0.009
-
Living together-does it help or hinder the pursuit of a healthful diet, physical activity, and weight loss among cancer survivors and their chosen partners? Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 03; 32(10):700.
Score: 0.009
-
Patient-centered development of a bladder cancer survivorship care plan. Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 31; 32(6):397.
Score: 0.009
-
Nativity Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hispanics in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Aug; 26(4):632-640.
Score: 0.009
-
Rationale and Methods for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Weight Loss Intervention among Cancer Survivors and Partners: The DUET Study. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 29; 13(10).
Score: 0.007
-
Neighborhood deprivation index is associated with weight status among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Cancer Surviv. 2021 10; 15(5):767-775.
Score: 0.007
-
Gastrostomy Utilization by Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Is Partially Driven by Swallowing Function. Laryngoscope. 2020 09; 130(9):2153-2159.
Score: 0.006
-
Serum Metabolic Profiling Identified a Distinct Metabolic Signature in Bladder Cancer Smokers: A Key Metabolic Enzyme Associated with Patient Survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 04; 28(4):770-781.
Score: 0.006
-
Longitudinal associations between caregiver burden and patient and spouse distress in couples coping with lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep; 21(9):2371-9.
Score: 0.004
-
The role of blame in the psychosocial adjustment of couples coping with lung cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2012 Dec; 44(3):331-40.
Score: 0.004
-
Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10; 30(5):539-47.
Score: 0.004
-
A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. J Behav Med. 2012 Jun; 35(3):334-46.
Score: 0.004
-
Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Mar; 4(1):74-85.
Score: 0.003
-
Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation. Ann Behav Med. 2008 Oct; 36(2):129-40.
Score: 0.003
-
Moderator analyses of participants in the Active for Life after cancer trial: implications for physical activity group intervention studies. Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb; 33(1):99-104.
Score: 0.003