Header Logo

Connection

HODA BADR to Middle Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HODA BADR has written about Middle Aged.
HODA BADR
Connection Strength
1.331
Middle Aged
  1. Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers to Mental Health Support for Informal Caregivers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2026 Mar 06; 23(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  2. Stress, Employment Changes, and Psychological Distress Among Caregivers of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun 01; 151(6):541-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  3. Unmet supportive care needs in patients with advanced cancer and its impact on distress. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 21; 24(1):110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  4. Multilevel barriers and supportive care preferences of metastatic breast cancer patients and their caregivers: a mixed-methods analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 11; 33(3):177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  5. Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study. Ann Behav Med. 2025 01 04; 59(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  6. Development and validation of FinTox: A new screening tool to assess cancer-related financial toxicity. Cancer Med. 2024 Aug; 13(15):e7306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  7. Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of Three Outreach Events to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Communities in Houston, Texas, 2022. Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug; 139(1_suppl):71S-80S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  8. Social Connectedness and Perceived Stress Among Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Mixed-Methods Study. Int J Behav Med. 2024 Jun; 31(3):380-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  9. A mixed-methods study to inform development of a caregiver-specific problem list for cancer distress screening. Psychooncology. 2023 Oct; 32(10):1578-1585.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  10. Predictors of COVID-19 perceived susceptibility: insights from population-based self-reported survey during lockdown in the United States. J Infect Public Health. 2022 May; 15(5):508-514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  11. Sociodemographic and Health Belief Model Factors Associated with Nonadherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies in the United States. Ann Behav Med. 2021 06 28; 55(7):677-685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  12. Lifestyle behaviors and intervention preferences of early-stage lung cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Mar; 29(3):1465-1475.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  13. Emotional disclosure and cognitive processing in couples coping with head and neck cancer. J Behav Med. 2020 06; 43(3):411-425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  14. Associations between pre-, post-, and peri-operative variables and health resource use following surgery for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019 03; 90:102-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  15. Self-management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer. 2019 04 01; 125(7):1176-1184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  16. Outpatient Pain Medication Use: An Electronic Daily Diary Study in Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 04; 55(4):1131-1137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  17. Survivorship Challenges and Information Needs after Radiotherapy for Oral Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2017 Dec; 32(4):799-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  18. Natural language use and couples' adjustment to head and neck cancer. Health Psychol. 2016 Oct; 35(10):1069-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016 Jul-Aug; 34(4):336-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  20. Depression in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their informal caregivers. Aging Ment Health. 2017 09; 21(9):975-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  21. Development and usability testing of a web-based self-management intervention for oral cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep; 25(5):806-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  22. An observational study of social control, mood, and self-efficacy in couples during treatment for head and neck cancer. Psychol Health. 2015; 30(7):783-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  23. Pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and dyadic adjustment influence patient and partner depression in metastatic breast cancer. Clin J Pain. 2014 Nov; 30(11):923-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. Psychological distress in patients and caregivers over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014 Oct; 50(10):1005-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  25. Associations among pain, pain attitudes, and pain behaviors in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2014 Aug; 37(4):595-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  26. An exploratory study of the informational and psychosocial needs of patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2013 Nov; 49(11):1067-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. An electronic diary study of the effects of patient avoidance and partner social constraints on patient momentary affect in metastatic breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr; 45(2):192-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Aug; 22(8):1688-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  29. Sexual problems, communication patterns, and depressive symptoms in couples coping with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Apr; 22(4):814-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  30. Associations between depression, pain behaviors, and partner responses to pain in metastatic breast cancer. Pain. 2011 Nov; 152(11):2596-2604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  31. Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology. 2010 Sep; 19(9):941-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  32. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010 Mar; 29(2):169-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  33. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009 Jul; 18(7):735-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  34. Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychol. 2008 Sep; 27(5):616-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  35. Mood states associated with transitory physical symptoms among breast and ovarian cancer survivors. J Behav Med. 2006 Oct; 29(5):461-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  36. Dyadic adjustment in chronic illness: does relationship talk matter? J Fam Psychol. 2005 Sep; 19(3):465-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  37. Genome-wide association study for lung cancer in 6531 African Americans reveals new susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2025 Jul 03; 34(14):1227-1237.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  38. Living together-does it help or hinder the pursuit of a healthful diet, physical activity, and weight loss among cancer survivors and their chosen partners? Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 03; 32(10):700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  39. Patient-centered development of a bladder cancer survivorship care plan. Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 31; 32(6):397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. Nativity Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hispanics in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Aug; 26(4):632-640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  41. Rationale and Methods for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Weight Loss Intervention among Cancer Survivors and Partners: The DUET Study. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 29; 13(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  42. Gastrostomy Utilization by Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Is Partially Driven by Swallowing Function. Laryngoscope. 2020 09; 130(9):2153-2159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  43. Serum Metabolic Profiling Identified a Distinct Metabolic Signature in Bladder Cancer Smokers: A Key Metabolic Enzyme Associated with Patient Survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 04; 28(4):770-781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  44. Effects of diet and exercise on weight-related outcomes for breast cancer survivors and their adult daughters: an analysis of the DAMES trial. Support Care Cancer. 2017 08; 25(8):2559-2568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  45. Daughters and Mothers Against Breast Cancer (DAMES): main outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of weight loss in overweight mothers with breast cancer and their overweight daughters. Cancer. 2014 Aug 15; 120(16):2522-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  46. Longitudinal associations between caregiver burden and patient and spouse distress in couples coping with lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep; 21(9):2371-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  47. The role of blame in the psychosocial adjustment of couples coping with lung cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2012 Dec; 44(3):331-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  48. Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10; 30(5):539-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  49. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Mar; 4(1):74-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  50. Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation. Ann Behav Med. 2008 Oct; 36(2):129-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. Moderator analyses of participants in the Active for Life after cancer trial: implications for physical activity group intervention studies. Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb; 33(1):99-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.