Connection

DANIEL DESALVO to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DANIEL DESALVO has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.490
  1. Real-World Insights Into Hypoglycemia Risk While Driving in Teens and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2025; 2025:5053872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  2. Glycemic Outcomes Persist for up to 2 Years in Very Young Children with the Omnipod? 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Jun; 26(6):383-393.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  3. Social Determinant of Health Impact on Diabetes Device Use and Clinical Outcomes in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023; 2023:4751595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  4. Transatlantic Comparison of Pediatric Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in the Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation Initiative and Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 12; 24(12):920-924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  5. Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems and Glycemic Outcomes in Children and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Evidence From a U.S.-Based Multicenter Collaborative. Diabetes Care. 2022 08 01; 45(8):e118-e119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  6. Long-term Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: One-Year Results From the SENCE Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jul; 17(4):976-987.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  7. Patient Demographics and Clinical Outcomes Among Type 1 Diabetes Patients Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Data From T1D Exchange Real-World Observational Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 03; 17(2):322-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  8. Off-label use of sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitors among adults in type 1 diabetes exchange registry. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 01; 24(1):171-173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  9. Diabetes Device Use and Glycemic Control among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. J Diabetes Res. 2018; 2018:5162162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  10. Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 11; 19(7):1271-1275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  11. Effect of lipohypertrophy on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct; 38(10):e166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep; 8(5):969-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Remote glucose monitoring in camp setting reduces the risk of prolonged nocturnal hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 01; 16(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Oct; 13(5):657-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  15. In children with premature adrenarche, bone age advancement by 2 or more years is common and generally benign. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 26(3-4):215-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. A learner-centered diabetes management curriculum: reducing resident errors on an inpatient diabetes pathway. Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov; 35(11):2188-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. Cholestasis secondary to panhypopituitarism in an infant. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Mar; 100(3):342-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  18. A multimodal physiological dataset for non-invasive blood glucose estimation. Sci Data. 2025 Nov 19; 12(1):1822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  19. Severe and Recurrent Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children and Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: Risk and Protective Factors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Oct; 27(10):801-811.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Early Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Rates of Initiation and Impact on Glycemic Outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2025 May 01; 48(5):768-775.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  21. SCI - U: Validation of an updated Self-Care Inventory for contemporary diabetes management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jun; 224:112218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring. Horm Res Paediatr. 2024; 97(6):615-635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Psychosocial outcomes with the Omnipod? 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in caregivers of very young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 12; 26(12):5569-5579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Diabetic ketoacidosis in youth with diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Sep 25; 37(9):759-763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Promoting Resilience in Stress Management for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 08 01; 7(8):e2428287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  26. Real-World Evidence of Omnipod? 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System Use in 69,902 People with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Aug; 26(8):514-525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  27. Two Years with a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System: A Single-Arm Multicenter Trial in Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 01; 26(1):11-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  28. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Provides Durable Glycemic Benefit in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: 12-Month Follow-Up Results. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023; 2023:6718115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Adolescent- and Young Adult-Reported Outcomes and Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Features: A Report from the CITY Trial. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023; 2023:6906023.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev. 2023 03 04; 44(2):254-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  31. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 12; 23(8):1390-1405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  32. Protocol for the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention: A multi-site randomized controlled trial for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 01; 124:107017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  33. Detection of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Using Noninvasive Wearable Sensors: Electrocardiograms and Accelerometry. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 03; 18(2):351-362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  34. Safety and Glycemic Outcomes With a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Arm Multicenter Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2022 08 01; 45(8):1907-1910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  35. Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy Among Young Patients With Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 09 01; 4(9):e2126126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  36. Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021 07; 44(7):1630-1640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  37. Adoption of Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 09; 23(9):642-651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  38. A Real-World Prospective Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Loop Open Source Automated Insulin Delivery System. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 05; 23(5):367-375.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  39. Inequities in Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and COVID-19: Data From 52 US Clinical Centers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 03 25; 106(4):e1755-e1762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. Diabetes Curriculum for Pediatric Endocrine Fellowship Utilizing Modified Team-Based Learning. MedEdPORTAL. 2020 08 13; 16:10948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  41. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 06 16; 323(23):2388-2396.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  42. Feature-Based Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Hypoglycemia Prediction. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 07; 15(4):842-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  43. Characteristics of adult- compared to childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020 12; 37(12):2109-2115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  44. Time spent outside of target glucose range for young children with type 1 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitor study. Diabet Med. 2020 08; 37(8):1308-1315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  45. Sources and Valence of Information Impacting Parents' Decisions to Use Diabetes Technologies in Young Children <8 Years Old with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 09; 22(9):697-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  46. "I'm essentially his pancreas": Parent perceptions of diabetes burden and opportunities to reduce burden in the care of children <8?years old with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 03; 21(2):377-383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  47. The Transatlantic HbA1c gap: differences in glycaemic control across the lifespan between people included in the US T1D Exchange Registry and those included in the German/Austrian DPV registry. Diabet Med. 2020 05; 37(5):848-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  48. Greater parental comfort with lower glucose targets in young children with Type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabet Med. 2019 11; 36(11):1508-1510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  49. Benefits and Barriers of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 09; 21(9):493-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. Medical and Psychological Considerations for Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2019 04 27; 19(6):27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. Dyslipidaemia and statin use in individuals aged 10 to <40 years in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 01; 21(1):170-172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  52. Insulin Pump Use in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Sociodemographic Factors and Parent-Reported Barriers. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 06; 19(6):363-369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  53. Nighttime is the worst time: Parental fear of hypoglycemia in young children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 02; 19(1):114-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  54. Home use of a bihormonal bionic pancreas versus insulin pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 2017 01 28; 389(10067):369-380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  55. Early Detection of Infusion Set Failure During Insulin Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 11; 10(6):1268-1276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  56. Camp for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2016 08; 16(8):68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  57. Duration of Infusion Set Survival in Lipohypertrophy Versus Nonlipohypertrophied Tissue in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 07; 18(7):429-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  58. Effect of acetaminophen on CGM glucose in an outpatient setting. Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct; 38(10):e158-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  59. Overnight glucose control with an automated, unified safety system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes at diabetes camp. Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug; 37(8):2310-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  60. Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Feb; 35(2):207-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.