Connection

JOSEPH MILLS to Diabetic Foot

This is a "connection" page, showing publications JOSEPH MILLS has written about Diabetic Foot.
Connection Strength

10.785
  1. Engaging patients and caregivers to establish priorities for the management of diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2021 04; 73(4):1388-1395.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.549
  2. The patient presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Does diabetes influence presentation, limb outcomes and survival? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.523
  3. The impact of foot infection on infrainguinal bypass outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2018 12; 68(6):1841-1847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.475
  4. The accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies used to identify peripheral artery disease among patients with diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec; 64(6):1682-1690.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.415
  5. Lower limb ischaemia in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and gangrene: recognition, anatomic patterns and revascularization strategies. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan; 32 Suppl 1:239-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  6. The Society for Vascular Surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) correlates with risk of major amputation and time to wound healing. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr; 61(4):939-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  7. Update and validation of the Society for Vascular Surgery wound, ischemia, and foot infection threatened limb classification system. Semin Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar; 27(1):16-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  8. Open bypass and endovascular procedures among diabetic foot ulcer cases in the United States from 2001 to 2010. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov; 60(5):1255-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.358
  9. Author?s response. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 103(4):344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  10. Toward a change in syntax in diabetic foot care: prevention equals remission. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr; 103(2):161-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  11. The impact and outcomes of establishing an integrated interdisciplinary surgical team to care for the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Sep; 28(6):514-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.315
  12. Clinical efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection as a curative procedure in patients with diabetes mellitus and neuropathic forefoot wounds. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012 Aug; 5(4):235-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  13. Intraoperative fluorescence vascular angiography: during tibial bypass. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 01; 6(1):204-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  14. Rescuing Sisyphus: the team approach to amputation prevention. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):1S-2S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  15. Rescuing sisyphus: the team approach to amputation prevention. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct; 100(5):315-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  16. Three-Year Recurrence in People With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Is Comparable to Cancer. Int Wound J. 2025 Aug; 22(8):e70724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  17. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2024 Nov 01; 47(11):1958-1968.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  18. Guidelines regarding negative wound therapy (NPWT) in the diabetic foot. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Apr; 50(4B Suppl):3S-27S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  19. Current Status and Principles for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the Cardiovascular Patient Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024 01 23; 149(4):e232-e253.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  20. Most individuals with diabetes-related foot ulceration do not meet dietary consensus guidelines for wound healing. Int Wound J. 2024 Mar; 21(3):e14483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  21. Editor's Choice - The Intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS Guidelines on Peripheral Artery Disease in People With Diabetes Mellitus and a Foot Ulcer. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 10; 66(4):454-483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  22. The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Nov; 78(5):1101-1131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  23. The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3686.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  24. Effectiveness of revascularisation for the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  25. Performance of non-invasive bedside vascular testing in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among people with foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  26. Definitions and criteria for diabetes-related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  27. Guidelines on the classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  28. Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: A?systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 03; 40(3):e3645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  29. Frailty in People with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb; 89:322-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  30. Effectiveness of revascularisation of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  31. Performance of prognostic markers in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among patients with foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  32. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  33. Effectiveness of bedside investigations to diagnose peripheral artery disease among people with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  34. Diabetic foot ulcer classifications: A critical review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  35. Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 03; 36 Suppl 1:e3276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  36. The importance of establishing a framework for regional and international collaboration in the management of the diabetic foot. J Vasc Surg. 2019 07; 70(1):335-336.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  37. Health Care Service and Outcomes Among an Estimated 6.7 Million Ambulatory Care Diabetic Foot Cases in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2017 07; 40(7):936-942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  38. Does Physiological Stress Slow Down Wound Healing in Patients With Diabetes? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 07; 11(4):685-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  39. The application of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification to stratify amputation risk. J Vasc Surg. 2017 03; 65(3):591-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  40. A systematic review and meta-analysis of tests to predict wound healing in diabetic foot. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb; 63(2 Suppl):29S-36S.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  41. The management of diabetic foot: A clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb; 63(2 Suppl):3S-21S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  42. A Diabetic Emergency One Million Feet Long: Disparities and Burdens of Illness among Diabetic Foot Ulcer Cases within Emergency Departments in the United States, 2006-2010. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0134914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  43. The deteriorating DFU: prioritising risk factors to avoid amputation. J Wound Care. 2015 May; 24(5 Suppl 2):31-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  44. How to do a 3-minute diabetic foot exam. J Fam Pract. 2014 Nov; 63(11):646-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  45. Foot-in-wallet disease: tripped up by "cost-saving" reductions? Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep; 37(9):e196-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  46. Split-thickness skin grafting the high-risk diabetic foot. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun; 59(6):1657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  47. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan; 59(1):220-34.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  48. Mind the gap: disparity between research funding and costs of care for diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul; 36(7):1815-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  49. Toe and flow: essential components and structure of the amputation prevention team. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):23S-27S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  50. A step-wise approach for surgical management of diabetic foot infections. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):72S-75S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  51. Toe and flow: essential components and structure of the amputation prevention team. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct; 100(5):342-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  52. A stepwise approach for surgical management of diabetic foot infections. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct; 100(5):401-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  53. An update on pharmacological interventions for diabetic foot ulcers. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Oct; 3(5):285-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  54. Letter: use of cotton cast padding instead of gauze wrap as a secondary dressing for high-risk wounds. Int Wound J. 2009 Aug; 6(4):303-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  55. Defining success in clinical trials of diabetic foot wounds: the Los Angeles DFCon consensus. Int Wound J. 2009 Jun; 6(3):211-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  56. Use of a Nanoflex powder dressing for wound management following debridement for necrotising fasciitis in the diabetic foot. Int Wound J. 2009 Apr; 6(2):133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  57. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug; 31(8):1679-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  58. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment. Endocr Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug; 14(5):576-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  59. Effectiveness of bedside investigations to diagnose peripheral artery disease among people with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3683.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  60. Novel use of insulin in continuous-instillation negative pressure wound therapy as "wound chemotherapy". J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 01; 4(4):820-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  61. Role of negative pressure wound therapy in treating peripheral vascular graft infections. Vascular. 2008 Jul-Aug; 16(4):194-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.