Header Logo

Connection

JOSEPH MILLS to Vascular Surgical Procedures

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications JOSEPH MILLS has written about Vascular Surgical Procedures.
JOSEPH MILLS
Connection Strength
6.865
Vascular Surgical Procedures
  1. Effect of Postoperative Permissive Anemia and Cardiovascular Risk Status on Outcomes After Major General and Vascular Surgery Operative Interventions. Ann Surg. 2019 10; 270(4):602-611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.437
  2. Using the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification to identify patients most likely to benefit from revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep; 70(3):776-785.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.421
  3. Effect of postoperative anemia and baseline cardiac risk on serious adverse outcomes after major vascular interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2017 12; 66(6):1836-1843.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  4. The influence of do-not-resuscitate status on the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency vascular operations. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun; 61(6):1538-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  5. Open bypass and endovascular procedures among diabetic foot ulcer cases in the United States from 2001 to 2010. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov; 60(5):1255-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.304
  6. Invited commentary. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun; 55(6):1820.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  7. Invited commentary. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul; 54(1):167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  8. Rescuing Sisyphus: the team approach to amputation prevention. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):1S-2S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  9. Diagnosis and management of aortic mycotic aneurysms. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Jan; 44(1):5-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  10. Vascular surgery training in the United States: a half-century of evolution. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec; 48(6 Suppl):90S-97S; discussion 97S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  11. Open bypass and endoluminal therapy: complementary techniques for revascularization in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun; 24 Suppl 1:S34-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  12. A contemporary paradigm for value-based medicine in peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Dec; 82(6):2264-2273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  13. Wound care-first strategies provide superior amputation-free survival in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection clinical stages 1 and 2. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Dec; 82(6):2200-2209.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  14. Textbook outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia remain rare. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug; 82(2):536-548.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  15. Validation of the WIfI classification in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug; 82(2):549-558.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  16. Advanced Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection stage is associated with poor outcomes in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar; 81(3):720-729.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  17. Editor's Choice - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Publication Standards for Reporting Vascular Surgical Research. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Jan; 69(1):9-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  18. Appropriate care in chronic limb threatening ischemia: A review of current evidence and outcomes. Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun; 37(2):249-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  19. A Review of WIfI Clinical Staging to Predict Outcomes in Patients With Threatened Limbs. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct; 107:146-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  20. The position of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 05; 11(3):672-673.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  21. Society for Vascular Surgery appropriate use criteria for management of intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2022 07; 76(1):3-22.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  22. Society for Vascular Surgery best practice recommendations for use of social media. J Vasc Surg. 2021 12; 74(6):1783-1791.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  23. Association Between Wearable Device-Based Measures of Physical Frailty and Major Adverse Events Following Lower Extremity Revascularization. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2020161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  24. Implementing global chronic limb-threatening ischemia guidelines in clinical practice: Utility of the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification System (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2020 10; 72(4):1451-1452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  25. The "Vascular Surgery COVID-19 Collaborative" (VASCC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 09; 60(3):489-490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  26. The impact of organized multidisciplinary care on limb salvage in patients with mild to moderate WIfI ischemia grades. J Vasc Surg. 2020 06; 71(6):2081-2082.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  27. Failure on a Vascular Surgery Board-American Board of Surgery Examination does not predict cardiovascular outcomes in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2020 11; 72(5):1753-1760.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  28. Building a Global Alliance in Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Sep; 58(3):318-319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  29. Symptomatic Celiomesenteric Trunk: Variable Presentations and Outcomes in 2 Patients. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 02; 45(1):35-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  30. The application of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification to stratify amputation risk. J Vasc Surg. 2017 03; 65(3):591-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  31. Regional variation in patient selection and treatment for lower extremity vascular disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan; 65(1):108-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  32. Key Concepts in Critical Limb Ischemia: Selected Proceedings from the 2015 Vascular Interventional Advances Meeting. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan; 38:191-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  33. Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar; 61(3 Suppl):2S-41S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  34. Early quantitative evaluation of indocyanine green angiography in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013 May; 57(5):1213-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  35. The impact and outcomes of establishing an integrated interdisciplinary surgical team to care for the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Sep; 28(6):514-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  36. Comparison of initial hemodynamic response after endovascular therapy and open surgical bypass in patients with diabetes mellitus and critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug; 56(2):380-6; discussion 386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  37. Intraoperative fluorescence vascular angiography: during tibial bypass. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 01; 6(1):204-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  38. Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery (APDVS) survey of program selection, knowledge acquisition, and education provided as viewed by vascular trainees from two different training paradigms. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb; 55(2):588-97; discussion 598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  39. Critical evaluation of endovascular surgery for limb salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan; 127 Suppl 1:163S-173S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  40. Comparison of surgical operative experience of trainees and practicing vascular surgeons: a report from the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr; 53(4):1130-9; discussion 1139-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  41. Toe and flow: essential components and structure of the amputation prevention team. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):23S-27S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  42. A step-wise approach for surgical management of diabetic foot infections. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):72S-75S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  43. Role of negative pressure wound therapy in treating peripheral vascular graft infections. Vascular. 2008 Jul-Aug; 16(4):194-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  44. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun; 22(3):328-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  45. Guidelines regarding negative wound therapy (NPWT) in the diabetic foot. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Apr; 50(4B Suppl):3S-27S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  46. Editor's Choice - The Intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS Guidelines on Peripheral Artery Disease in People With Diabetes Mellitus and a Foot Ulcer. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 10; 66(4):454-483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  47. Effectiveness of revascularisation for the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  48. Building a global alliance in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2019 09; 70(3):663-664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  49. Survival trends after inferior vena cava and aortic injuries in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2018 12; 68(6):1880-1888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  50. The management of diabetic foot: A clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb; 63(2 Suppl):3S-21S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  51. Is early postoperative duplex scan surveillance of leg bypass grafts clinically important? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar; 37(3):495-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.